sci.logic (thread)

Simple way to multiply big numbers (video), Xadai, 2006/11/30
- Re: Simple way to multiply big numbers (video), Jan Burse, 2006/11/30
Deep Thoughts # 28. The Meaning of Truth (Finally!), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
- Re: Deep Thoughts # 28. The Meaning of Truth (Finally!), Windows User, 2006/11/30
  - Re: Deep Thoughts # 28. The Meaning of Truth (Finally!), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
description logic - axiomatic set theory, S.L., 2006/11/29
- Re: description logic - axiomatic set theory, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/29
Logical Implication and Equivalence, Mad_man_on_a_MissIon, 2006/11/28
- Re: Logical Implication and Equivalence, herbzet, 2006/11/28
fourier transformation and distributions, gilraen, 2006/11/26
- Re: fourier transformation and distributions, David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/27
- Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Frederick Williams, 2006/11/28
Q: equality elemination, Nils, 2006/11/26
- Re: Q: equality elemination, William Elliot, 2006/11/26
Finite/infinite models, lacrimosalundin, 2006/11/26
- Re: Finite/infinite models, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/26
  - Re: Finite/infinite models, lacrimosalundin, 2006/11/27
compactness theorem confusion, Snis Pilbor, 2006/11/25
- Re: compactness theorem confusion, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/26
- Re: compactness theorem confusion, David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/26
- Re: compactness theorem confusion, tohentoon, 2006/11/28
Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", jerry kraus, 2006/11/25
- Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", John Jones, 2006/11/26
- Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", LauLuna, 2006/11/28
- Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", LauLuna, 2006/11/28
  - Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", jerry kraus, 2006/11/28
axioms of mathematical logic, itaj, 2006/11/24
- Re: axioms of mathematical logic, smn, 2006/11/24
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, John Jones, 2006/11/26
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, tohentoon, 2006/11/28
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, itaj, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, tohentoon, 2006/11/29
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
- Re: axioms of mathematical logic, David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/26
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, John Jones, 2006/11/26
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Frederick Williams, 2006/11/26
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, John Jones, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/26
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/26
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/27
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/27
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, itaj, 2006/11/28
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, MoeBlee, 2006/11/28
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
- Re: axioms of mathematical logic, John Jones, 2006/11/26
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
- Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
  - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, MoeBlee, 2006/11/30
    - Re: axioms of mathematical logic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
      
      Re: axioms of mathematical logic, MoeBlee, 2006/11/30
Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Contingent Things, tg, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Ray Eston Smith Jr, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, Wanker, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Wanker, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Wanker, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Citizen Bob, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things - Fallacies of Composition & Division, Immortalist, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things - Fallacies of Composition & Division, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, chazwin, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
    - Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Contingent Things, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, Bill Snyder, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Contingent Things, Brian Fletcher, 2006/11/24
- Re: Contingent Things, George Dance, 2006/11/25
Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Immortalist, 2006/11/22
- Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., calee, 2006/11/22
  - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Immortalist, 2006/11/22
    - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., calee, 2006/11/22
    - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Lucifer, 2006/11/22
    - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Smiler, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Immortalist, 2006/11/24
  - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Therion Ware, 2006/11/22
    - Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Don't sweat the petty things & don't pet the sweaty things., Therion Ware, 2006/11/23
Possibility of the Empty World, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/22
- Re: Possibility of the Empty World, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/22
- Re: Possibility of the Empty World, William Elliot, 2006/11/22
- Re: Possibility of the Empty World, Roberto Vescarelli, 2006/11/23
Block-Shifting Puzzle, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/21
How to enumerate this subset of the assignment functions for a formula?, malsburg, 2006/11/21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/20
A less than familiar mathematics?, John Jones, 2006/11/19
Stone, Bronze & Iron - The Three Age System (helped store things in the museum & by chance fit the historical reality), Immortalist, 2006/11/19
Neural Networks and Formal Systems, LauLuna, 2006/11/19
- Re: Neural Networks and Formal Systems, abo, 2006/11/19
Re: Please Explain: How Is 5?F ***NOT*** Three Times Warmer Than 15?F????, Reef Fish, 2006/11/19
Shoenfield 5.2e, mmweiss, 2006/11/18
- Re: Shoenfield 5.2e, James Dolan, 2006/11/19
  - Re: Shoenfield 5.2e, george, 2006/11/20
    - Re: Shoenfield 5.2e, mmweiss, 2006/11/21
SIPTA Newsletter Announcement - New issue, Alessandro Antonucci, 2006/11/18
Existence : A Chinese Perspective, jerry kraus, 2006/11/17
Our Heavenly Father on 11-22-05 at 12:47 P.M., cattheon, 2006/11/16
If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/15
- Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/16
  - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/16
- Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/16
- Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/16
  - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/16
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/25
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/17
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Confutus, 2006/11/19
  - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/16
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Daryl McCullough, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Keith Ramsay, 2006/11/26
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Daryl McCullough, 2006/11/28
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/24
    - Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, lugita15, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, lugita15, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, lugita15, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, lugita15, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/29
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, lugita15, 2006/11/29
      
      Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Newberry, 2006/11/29
- Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, Frederick Williams, 2006/11/18
- Re: If (P & ~P) -> Q is not derivable then Goedel's formula is not derivable, george, 2006/11/18
$$ logic wars $ einstein cantor godel wobble $$, galathaea, 2006/11/15
- Re: $$ logic wars $ einstein cantor godel wobble $$, Driftintones@xxxxxxx, 2006/11/15
Property of recursive set, Atreides, 2006/11/15
Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh?, People Person, 2006/11/15
- Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh?, ANTICHRIST EXPOSED!!!, 2006/11/21
- Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh?, Freedom Loving Bushite Destroyer, 2006/11/30
Re: Silly Question, Prisoner at War, 2006/11/15
- Re: Silly Question, galathaea, 2006/11/15
Post hoc, ergo illius causa, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/14
- Re: Post hoc, ergo illius causa, Ed Cryer, 2006/11/15
IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, LauLuna, 2006/11/14
- Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/15
  - Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
    - Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, abo, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/18
- Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/15
  - Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/15
  - Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
    - Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, LauLuna, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, LauLuna, 2006/11/16
PCI,PMI,WOP?, HGL, 2006/11/13
- Re: PCI,PMI,WOP?, William Elliot, 2006/11/13
Queue, John Jones, 2006/11/12
- Re: Queue, mixi . mo, 2006/11/14
Goedel's formula made simple, Newberry, 2006/11/11
- Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/12
- Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/12
  - Re: Goedel's formula made simple, Newberry, 2006/11/12
    - Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, Newberry, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Goedel's formula made simple, lugita15, 2006/11/14
MOMENTARIAN "New" Google Beta Group, Nick, 2006/11/11
Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, george, 2006/11/11
- Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, Peter Olcott, 2006/11/11
- Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, Edward Green, 2006/11/11
  - Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, Peter Olcott, 2006/11/11
    - Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/12
    - Re: Is the Halting Problem merely an ill-formed question?, george, 2006/11/12
A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/11
- Re: A few questions about formal systems, Rupert, 2006/11/11
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/11
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Rupert, 2006/11/12
- Re: A few questions about formal systems, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/11
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/11
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/12
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/14
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/11
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/11
- Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/12
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/12
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, abo, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, abo, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, abo, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, Newberry, 2006/11/14
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/13
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, MoeBlee, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: A few questions about formal systems, MoeBlee, 2006/11/14
    - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/13
- Re: A few questions about formal systems, abo, 2006/11/14
  - Re: A few questions about formal systems, lugita15, 2006/11/14
context free grammars and ambiguity, Per Freem, 2006/11/11
- Re: context free grammars and ambiguity, William Elliot, 2006/11/11
Re: Bias against unintelligent people, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/11/10
What's this idea called., Edward Green, 2006/11/10
- Re: What's this idea called., galathaea, 2006/11/10
  - Re: What's this idea called., Edward Green, 2006/11/11
    - Re: What's this idea called., galathaea, 2006/11/11
    - Re: What's this idea called., George Dance, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: What's this idea called., Edward Green, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: What's this idea called., George Dance, 2006/11/13
  - Re: What's this idea called., TruthSlave, 2006/11/11
    - Re: What's this idea called., galathaea, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: What's this idea called., TruthSlave, 2006/11/12
  - Re: What's this idea called., Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/11/11
    - Re: What's this idea called., Edward Green, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: What's this idea called., Pouya D. Tafti, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: What's this idea called., Edward Green, 2006/11/12
- Re: What's this idea called., Jan Burse, 2006/11/11
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, george, 2006/11/09
- Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Keith Ramsay, 2006/11/26
Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/09
- Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
  - Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/10
    - Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Peter_Smith, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/13
    - Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Peter_Smith, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Peter_Smith, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Peter_Smith, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/14
  - Re: Request for Reference/Link to example of defining a theory/logic., Scott, 2006/11/13
Prove that function is not primitive recursive., Atreides, 2006/11/09
- Prove that function is not primitive recursive., Atreides, 2006/11/09
  - Re: Prove that function is not primitive recursive., Atreides, 2006/11/10
Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/08
- Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/09
  - Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/09
    - Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, MoeBlee, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Heinz Mau, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/10
  - Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/09
    - Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David R Tribble, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Heinz Mau, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/23
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/27
      
      Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, abo, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, abo, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Off topic Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/29
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David R Tribble, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jan Burse, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David R Tribble, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Tonico, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jan Burse, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jan Burse, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jan Burse, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David Marcus, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Infinity Again, Jan Burse, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Infinity Again, David R Tribble, 2006/11/17
- Re: Infinity Again, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/10
  - Re: Infinity Again, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/11/10
- Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 2006/11/08
Problem Solving Textbook, cjkogan111, 2006/11/07
- Re: Problem Solving Textbook, Ken Pledger, 2006/11/07
  - Re: Problem Solving Textbook, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/07
problems-solutions, S.L., 2006/11/07
- Re: problems-solutions, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
Real mathematics vs FOL, biubo, 2006/11/07
- Re: Real mathematics vs FOL, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/07
  - Re: Real mathematics vs FOL, biubo, 2006/11/08
    - Re: Real mathematics vs FOL, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Real mathematics vs FOL, biubo, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Real mathematics vs FOL, Mark Tarver, 2006/11/09
Bring an arbitrary square boolean matrix to the target matrix (developing fittness test - help please), Eric D., 2006/11/07
- Re: Bring an arbitrary square boolean matrix to the target matrix (developing fittness test - help please), tomek, 2006/11/07
  - Re: Bring an arbitrary square boolean matrix to the target matrix (developing fittness test - help please), Eric D., 2006/11/07
<no subject>, HGL, 2006/11/06
- Re: <no subject>, William Elliot, 2006/11/07
- Re: <no subject>, Nicholas Sherlock, 2006/11/07
- Re: <no subject>, Noehl, 2006/11/07
  - Re: <no subject>, William Elliot, 2006/11/07
    - Re: <no subject>, Noehl, 2006/11/13
- Re: <no subject>, George Dance, 2006/11/07
Generalized PMI proof, HGL, 2006/11/06
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL THE IGNORANT MASSES ?!!!!!, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, 2006/11/06
johnreed take 1A - Modified October 18, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 2006/11/06
CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
- Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Jan Burse, 2006/11/06
  - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
  - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/07
- Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), george, 2006/11/11
  - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/13
    - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), george, 2006/11/13
- Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Peter_Smith, 2006/11/11
  - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/13
    - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Chip Eastham, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), george, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Chip Eastham, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/20
  - Re: CBL (The system your professor doesn't want you to see.), george, 2006/11/13
Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
- Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/06
  - Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
    - Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/10
- Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
  - Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, lugita15, 2006/11/06
    - Re: Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
Re: Petersen's magical argument, George Dance, 2006/11/05
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, physicsajay, 2006/11/04
- Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, jonathan, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Nick, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, jonathan, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, jonathan, 2006/11/06
    - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, physicsajay, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Igor, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, einnew, 2006/11/06
    - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
- Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Proginoskes, 2006/11/05
  - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, physicsajay, 2006/11/05
- Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, karandash2000, 2006/11/05
  - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
    - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, karandash2000, 2006/11/05
- Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
  - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
    - Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Bob Kolker, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, tom, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, tom, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Hero, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Nick, 2006/11/08
General Arithmetic, abo, 2006/11/04
- Re: General Arithmetic, george, 2006/11/04
- Re: General Arithmetic, george, 2006/11/05
  - Re: General Arithmetic, george, 2006/11/11
Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, physicsajay, 2006/11/04
- Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck, physicsajay, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein�?Ts E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck, Sorcerer, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einsteinâ?Ts E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Sorcerer, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Sorcerer, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Sorcerer, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Art Deco, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/11/04
- Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, clujdej, 2006/11/05
  - Re: Einstein's E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ?, AJAY SHARMA, 2006/11/05
texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/03
- Re: texts for minimal logic, Mark Tarver, 2006/11/04
- Re: texts for minimal logic, galathaea, 2006/11/04
  - Re: texts for minimal logic, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/05
    - Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/05
    - Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/08
- Re: texts for minimal logic, mordov, 2006/11/08
  - Re: texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/24
    - Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, Jan Burse, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: texts for minimal logic, translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/27
Intuitionistic troubles..., translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/03
- Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., Mark Tarver, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/08
- Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., Jan Burse, 2006/11/04
- Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., galathaea, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., galathaea, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Intuitionistic troubles..., translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/08
Absolutely undecidable statements, Rupert, 2006/11/03
- Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Pierre Asselin, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Rupert, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Pierre Asselin, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Robert E. Beaudoin, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Pierre Asselin, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/05
- Re: Absolutely undecidable statements, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/07
Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Sir Frederick, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Sir Frederick, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, George Dance, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Sphere, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, George Dance, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, 99, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Sphere, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, 1Z, 2006/11/04
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, mikegordge, 2006/11/03
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, William Elliot, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, William Elliot, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, donstockbauer, 2006/11/04
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Tron, 2006/11/04
  - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/04
    - Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Tron, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Immortalist, 2006/11/05
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, nosugarintea, 2006/11/04
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Tobbs, 2006/11/04
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, knucmo, 2006/11/05
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, knucmo, 2006/11/05
- Re: Philosophical problems are false problems: they are due to linguistic misunderstandings, Robert Cohen, 2006/11/05
Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/03
- Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/03
- Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
  - Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Mitch, 2006/11/06
    - Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/08
- Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
  - Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/11/08
    - Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/11/09
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/09
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/09
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/22
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/21
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Alan Smaill, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Program Synthesis and formallization?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/10
Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill, 2006/11/03
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
  - Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill, 2006/11/06
    - Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill, 2006/11/27
      
      Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/30
Henkin models, Rupert, 2006/11/03
- Re: Henkin models, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/03
  - Re: Henkin models, Rupert, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Henkin models, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Henkin models, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/03
- Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/03
  - Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/03
    - Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/10
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Rupert, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Henrik, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/16
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/16
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/16
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Henrik, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Henrik, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, Henrik, 2006/11/17
      
      Re: The Gordian knot, John Jones, 2006/11/17
- SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
  - Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
    - Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', John Jones, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: SING UP everyone! ~ 'Oold man ribber, dat oold man ribber ~ he jus' keep a-rollin' aloonngg!', The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/11/13
fallacy of (denying hypothesis)/(affirming conclusion), gaya . patel, 2006/11/03
- Re: fallacy of (denying hypothesis)/(affirming conclusion), translogi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/11/03
- Re: fallacy of (denying hypothesis)/(affirming conclusion), George Dance, 2006/11/05
Re: We, as Scientists must show tolerance to opposite views, Phil Carmody, 2006/11/02
call anywhere free and talk usefull topiks, singh . xx . pawan, 2006/11/02
to Record Human Dreams, jaggusid, 2006/11/02
Simple Question regarding Simply Typed Lambda Calculus, Debajit Adhikary, 2006/11/02
- Re: Simple Question regarding Simply Typed Lambda Calculus, William Elliot, 2006/11/02
- Re: Simple Question regarding Simply Typed Lambda Calculus, Jan Burse, 2006/11/02
every formula is a logical consequence of its univeral closure., speechweb, 2006/11/01
- Re: every formula is a logical consequence of its univeral closure., herbzet, 2006/11/01
incompleteness and inconsistency, Per Freem, 2006/11/01
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/01
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/01
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/01
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/14
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/07
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, george, 2006/11/04
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/01
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/01
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/02
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, george, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, george, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Peter_Smith, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/15
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/16
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/18
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/19
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/20
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Nam Nguyen, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, lugita15, 2006/11/30
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/16
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/03
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Per Freem, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/04
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Newberry, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Newberry, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Rupert, 2006/11/06
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/03
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, MoeBlee, 2006/11/03
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Per Freem, 2006/11/04
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
  - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, abo, 2006/11/05
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
    - Re: incompleteness and inconsistency, george, 2006/11/07
      
      Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, Rupert, 2006/11/24
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, Rupert, 2006/11/26
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, Rupert, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/25
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, Rupert, 2006/11/26
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, george, 2006/11/28
      
      Re: Is FLT in the language of PA?, Rupert, 2006/11/28
Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/01
- Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/01
  - Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/03
    - Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/06
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/07
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/08
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/11
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/12
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, lugita15, 2006/11/13
      
      Re: Question about Quine's New Foundations, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/11/14
Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein’s E=mc2, physicsajay, 2006/11/01
- Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einstein’s E=mc2, physicsajay, 2006/11/03
Flavor of linear logic corresponding to symmetric monoidal categories with duals?, metaweta, 2006/10/31
Re: Why Has None of Computer Science been Formalized?, Brian, 2006/10/31
- Re: Why Has None of Computer Science been Formalized?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/11/06
Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Paul Holbach, 2006/10/31
- Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/11/01
- Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Nam Nguyen, 2006/10/31
  - Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Paul Holbach, 2006/11/01
- Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/01
  - Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/11/01
[FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger, 2006/10/31
Re: On Ultrafinitism, Rupert, 2006/10/31
- Re: On Ultrafinitism, MoeBlee, 2006/11/02
  - Re: On Ultrafinitism, Rupert, 2006/11/02
    - Re: On Ultrafinitism, MoeBlee, 2006/11/02
- Re: On Ultrafinitism, Eckard Blumschein, 2006/11/01
- Re: On Ultrafinitism, R. Srinivasan, 2006/11/03
- Re: On Ultrafinitism, Keith Ramsay, 2006/11/10
Axioms & quantification, bluelabel, 2006/10/31
- Re: Axioms & quantification, Frederick Williams, 2006/10/31
  - Re: Axioms & quantification, bluelabel, 2006/11/01
    - Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, bluelabel, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, bluelabel, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/02
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, Frederick Williams, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/03
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, Frederick Williams, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/04
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, Chris Menzel, 2006/11/05
      
      Re: Axioms & quantification, MoeBlee, 2006/11/06
Re: The L3 Revolution, William Elliot, 2006/10/31
- Re: The L3 Revolution, Confutus, 2006/10/31
  - Re: The L3 Revolution, William Elliot, 2006/11/01
- Re: The L3 Revolution, Confutus, 2006/11/01
- Re: The L3 Revolution, Confutus, 2006/11/15
  - Re: The L3 Revolution, galathaea, 2006/11/16
    - Re: The L3 Revolution, Confutus, 2006/11/17
Smallest relation satisfying the following..., frob, 2006/10/31
- Re: Smallest relation satisfying the following..., Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/01
- Re: Smallest relation satisfying the following..., David C . Ullrich, 2006/11/01
- Re: Smallest relation satisfying the following..., Frederick Williams, 2006/11/01
Re: how to define Thm in PRA, Peter_Smith, 2006/10/31
- Re: how to define Thm in PRA, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/01
  - Re: how to define Thm in PRA, Daryl McCullough, 2006/11/01
- Re: how to define Thm in PRA, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/11/01