| Subject: | Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE |
|---|---|
| From: | "Paul Holbach" |
| Date: | 31 Oct 2006 06:11:56 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
> Roberto Vescarelli wrote: > My aim is to improve a logic grounded on the distinction beetwen being and > existence (Meinong, Russell [Princ. of Math. par. 427]) and the findings of > contemporary free logics (Lambert, etc.). So I want to search a logic free > of existential presuppositions. What you must do first is render a distinction between being and existence /intelligible/. #PH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Owen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Paul Holbach |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Jesse F. Hughes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: BEING AND EXISTENCE, Paul Holbach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |