| Subject: | Re: Proof of finite axiomatizability |
|---|---|
| From: | David C. Ullrich |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2006 04:33:34 -0500 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
On 25 Oct 2006 21:10:52 -0700, "Atreides" <gpekhimenko@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>F is a set of sentences: { A_1, A_2, ...} s.t. {A_1 .. A_i} |/= A_i+1 (
>A_i+1 is not a logical consequence of previous A_i's). How to prove
>that F is NOT finite axiomatizable?
Why do you think that follows? There are very simple counterexamples.
>Any ideas or hints?
>Can we do something like this - get every finite T, add it's elements
>to F and suppose that this property still holds?
************************
David C. Ullrich
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The Modified Halting Problem, Take ??? ., R. Srinivasan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The Modified Halting Problem, Take ??? ., R. Srinivasan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proof of finite axiomatizability, Aatu Koskensilta |
| Next by Thread: | On Ultrafinitism, Bill Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |