| Subject: | Re: Posts that should never be responded to ... |
|---|---|
| From: | "Randy Poe" |
| Date: | 21 Oct 2006 15:07:27 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic, sci.math |
schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Peter Webb wrote:
> > ... because the chance of anybody being convinced they are wrong is zero:
> >
> > "Disproof of Cantor"
> > "Solution to the halting problem"
> > "0/0="
> > "0^0="
> > "0.999 <> 1"
> > "Elementary proof of FLT"
> > "EINSTEIN"
> > "James Harris"
> >
> >
> > Any others?
>
> How about
>
> "WTC 7 freefall implies controlled demolition",
Yes, you're right. That definitely should be on the ignore list.
- Randy
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Charlie-Boo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Axiomatization of Ordinal Arithmetic, lugita15 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Posts that should never be responded to ..., schoenfeld . one |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Posts that should never be responded to ..., drmwecker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |