| Subject: | Re: Non-arbitrary mathematics |
|---|---|
| From: | Peter Niessen |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:42:16 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
Am Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:55:43 +0200 schrieb Eckard Blumschein: > Writing "infinity + any finite number = infinity", I would like to > express that the original and perhaps most reasonable meaning of > infinite denotes the _quality_ to be not subject to possible enlargement > and also not to exhaustion. My dear Eckard Du machst dich weltweit zum Narren! -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Peter Nießen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Non-arbitrary mathematics, Eckard Blumschein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Non-arbitrary mathematics, LauLuna |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |