| Subject: | Re: Self-Refrential 2 |
|---|---|
| From: | "George Dance" |
| Date: | 5 Oct 2006 13:03:36 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic, sci.math, sci.philosophy.tech |
Peter_Smith wrote: > Khodaeifar wrote: > > > For example "This is a sentence" is not a sentence since it is equivalent to > > .....is a sentence) is a sentence) is a sentence) whit no beginning. > > No. Given that the context makes it clear that the demonstrative "this" > in > > This is a sentence > > is pointing to that sentence I've just displayed -- imagine, here I am, > pointing to the sentence on the screen --- then that is true so long as > > "This is a sentence" is a sentence > > is true (since what "this" is pointing to is the sentence which we've > now given a quotation-name for). And that second displayed sentence is > plainly true. Oh? Why is "'This is a sentence' is a sentence." 'plainly true'? Since Khodeifar does not think it's 'plainly true', don't you think you owe him some reason for saying that? > So the first one is. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question), Alan Smaill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Modal Logic, Confutus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Self-Refrential (2), Peter_Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Self-Refrential (2), George Dance |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |