| Subject: | Re: Explicit choice functions on subsets of R |
|---|---|
| From: | |
| Date: | 5 Oct 2006 08:15:03 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
Rupert wrote: > There is no definable well-ordering of the reals. That's certainly true. It is consistent with ZFC that there is a definable well-ordering of the universe (and thus also of the reals), though. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logic-Philosophicus |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about first-order arithmetic, aatu . koskensilta |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about first-order arithmetic, aatu . koskensilta |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Explicit choice functions on subsets of R, Rupert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Explicit choice functions on subsets of R, Ross A. Finlayson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |