|
|
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
> Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear
> Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing
> about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
> 100 Years Of E=mc2.
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
> An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum.
> What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ?
> www.cern.ch
> Part I
> In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced
> yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear
> Reactors.
>
> Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my
> replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN.
> So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely
> unscientific.
> So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at
> CERN?
> It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it.
> So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of
> shame.
> ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques
> Blaising ( pasted below).
>
> Subject: RE: Is Dr Inpain at CERN
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200
> From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" <Jean-Jacques.Blaising@xxxxxxx> Add to
> Address Book Add Mobile Alert
>
> To: "ajay sharma" <physicsajay@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" <Jean-Jacques.Blaising@xxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Mrs Sharma,
> Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not
> registered at CERN as a scientific associate.
> Regards,
> Jean-Jacques Blaising
>
>
> That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity.
> So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU.
> You have cheated the scientific community.
>
>
> Part II
> You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add.
> However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for
> information.
> You have posted some links
> Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity.
> Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions.
> My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW.
>
> I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it
> originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com
>
> See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS..
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/b9b8f35cbe55f50f/277b3f49b8974b7a#277b3f49b8974b7a
> It has nothing to do with my work.
> gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf">http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf
> This link is without Name and Place.
> 100s times I asked rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx ( see numerous posts ,
> sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address
> in it.
> But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his
> name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder
> brother.
> So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to
> this
> Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end
> result is the same.
> It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not
> calculated.
> Further
> www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=macactupapi">http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=macactupapi
>
>
> This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e.
> application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to
> read 11th class book.
> Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half.
> However this author has promised me long back that author will
> contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept.
>
> Part III
>
> MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS.
> Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct
> Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays
> giving the facts e.g.
> What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ?
> What are conditions under which it is derived?
> Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
> How to generalize it under all conditions?
> What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation?
> How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905
> paper
> How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
> What are the correct interpretations?
> I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
> If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
> interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
> There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the
> references are given below for the purpose.
>
> Part IV
> References.
>
> References of Einstein’s work
> .
> A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
> . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
> UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
> Weblink is
> Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/">http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
>
> PartII
> References of Ajay Sharma’s work
>
> My work is available at
> A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
> ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
> www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf">http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
>
> For details
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
>
> International Conferences
> It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
> world
> --------------------------------------few of them
> 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
> Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
> August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
>
> 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
> (
> Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
>
> 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
>
> 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
> University of Warwick , ENGLAND
>
> 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
> ENGLAND
>
> 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
> Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
> (2003) 585.
> 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
> Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
> plus more
> --------------------------------------
> Journals
> This paper
> ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
> is published in journal
> Physics Essays , CANADA
> www.physicsessays.com
> The paper
> The past ,present and future of E=mc2
> will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
> USA.
> In parts it is published in various others journals.
> ----------------------
> Book 100 Years of E=mc2
> For details
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
> Ajay Sharma Email physicsajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1st October
> 2006
|
|