|
|
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:57 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>In article <of7cf25rnh8r1t8m2ejvbe9njv84cuf6e5@xxxxxxx>,
> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:48 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <6anbf2149b0ek0um9ei2f64anpj7sfffmn@xxxxxxx>,
>> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> >> In other words a crank by any other name.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The aphorism, "It takes one to know one" would seem to apply here.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And you know 'em all.
>> >> >
>> >> >I have not claimed to know any , but Zick has.
>> >>
>> >> No, no, I've merely claimed that you know them all.
>> >
>> >Which you could not know without being one yourself.
>>
>> Is that true, false, or just a definition?
>>
> Zick's ignorance reveals itself again.
Why? It's just a simple question. Perhaps though not to simpletons.
~v~~
|
|