|
|
On 30 Aug 2006 23:25:34 -0700, imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Virgil wrote:
>> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:35:05 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >In article <0knbf2pgrqbgnd0767qelqjfkau8ustnic@xxxxxxx>,
>> > > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:56:35 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >In article <31h9f2lhb5im2pt9gargnhfmnuv132rkbn@xxxxxxx>,
>> > >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:52:56 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >> >> On 28 Aug 2006 15:09:26 -0700, "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > >> >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >Definitions are not subject to "proof".
>
>Gosh. Snip.
>
>> What does Zick find ambiguous in "Let 'squircle' mean " a square
>> circle' "?
>> The only word in it of more than one syllable is "squircle".
>
>"Circle" seems to have two syllables to me.
Now, now, Brian, it's not polite to tease the animals. After all
there's a reason they're animals.
~v~~
|
|