|
|
In article <1157005534.118632.225770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Virgil wrote:
> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:35:05 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >In article <0knbf2pgrqbgnd0767qelqjfkau8ustnic@xxxxxxx>,
> > > > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:56:35 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >In article <31h9f2lhb5im2pt9gargnhfmnuv132rkbn@xxxxxxx>,
> > > >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:52:56 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> On 28 Aug 2006 15:09:26 -0700, "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Definitions are not subject to "proof".
>
> Gosh. Snip.
>
> > What does Zick find ambiguous in "Let 'squircle' mean " a square
> > circle' "?
> > The only word in it of more than one syllable is "squircle".
>
> "Circle" seems to have two syllables to me.
>
> Brian Chandler
> http://imaginatorium.org
I'll allow for one and a half.
|
|