|
|
Virgil wrote:
> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:35:05 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >In article <0knbf2pgrqbgnd0767qelqjfkau8ustnic@xxxxxxx>,
> > > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:56:35 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >In article <31h9f2lhb5im2pt9gargnhfmnuv132rkbn@xxxxxxx>,
> > >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:52:56 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> >> On 28 Aug 2006 15:09:26 -0700, "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >Lester Zick wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> >Definitions are not subject to "proof".
Gosh. Snip.
> What does Zick find ambiguous in "Let 'squircle' mean " a square
> circle' "?
> The only word in it of more than one syllable is "squircle".
"Circle" seems to have two syllables to me.
Brian Chandler
http://imaginatorium.org
|
|