|
|
In article <27qdnV4q8_Z78mvZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Your Logic Tutor" <ylt...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Sean" <relaxing@earth> wrote
>
> > I reject your rules.
>
> Rules are for ball games and such.
Logic has rules, and those, like Septic, who ignore them when they are
inconvenient, are illogical.
>This is not about rules, this is about
> the principles of valid argument
The statements of those "principles" are rules to be followed by those,
unlike Septic, who wish to make valid arguments.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/
Or does Septic wish claim that valid argument is without rules?
|
|