|
|
In article <of7cf25rnh8r1t8m2ejvbe9njv84cuf6e5@xxxxxxx>,
Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:48 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >In article <6anbf2149b0ek0um9ei2f64anpj7sfffmn@xxxxxxx>,
> > Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >> >> In other words a crank by any other name.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The aphorism, "It takes one to know one" would seem to apply here.
> >> >>
> >> >> And you know 'em all.
> >> >
> >> >I have not claimed to know any , but Zick has.
> >>
> >> No, no, I've merely claimed that you know them all.
> >
> >Which you could not know without being one yourself.
>
> Is that true, false, or just a definition?
>
Zick's ignorance reveals itself again.
|
|