| Subject: | Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x? |
|---|---|
| From: | "MoeBlee" |
| Date: | 29 Aug 2006 15:51:25 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
MoeBlee wrote: > How do we show there is a surjection from S to T without the axiom of > choice? Strike that question now. Menzel showed how to do it. > I don't see how to show PS\T not= 0 without again using the axiom of > choice. I figure it this way: Strike that. I figured out how to do it. So I have two proofs, Ullrich's and Rupert's that both answer my question. Thanks to everyone for their help. MoeBlee |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Rupert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Chris Menzel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, David C . Ullrich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |