| Subject: | Re: Every set can be ... ordered? |
|---|---|
| From: | "MoeBlee" |
| Date: | 26 Aug 2006 13:23:24 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.logic |
Rupert wrote:
> Also, {<x,x>|x in X} is always a partial
> ordering on X, so the result really is trivial.
Yep, I thought of that last night.So I was eager to get to a computer
today to post that the partial ordering question is, hopefully, the
dumbest question I'll ever have asked.
MoeBlee
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How big is infinity?, Jack Campin - bogus address |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert |
| Next by Thread: | Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |