sci.logic
[Top] [All Lists]

Why so many overlapping terminologies

Subject: Why so many overlapping terminologies
From: "Terry Padden"
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:25:19 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Superficially it seems that we have at least 5 distinct terminologies 
covering the same fundamental concepts. They are (I think, but I may have 
them mixed up)

In Logic                                Conjunction   &  Disjunction
In Set Theory                        Intersection   &   Union
In Boolean Algebra                  AND   &   OR
In Lattice Theory                     Meet   &   Join
In Arithmetic                          HCF   &   LCM

Obviously the axiomatics of the different contexts will provide different 
interpretations and applicability  -  but are the different vocabularies all 
really necessary or useful - or just confusing ?

Probably I am missing something obvious and/or significant.  Perhaps someone 
could point out significanly different concepts covered by the respective 
vocabularies; or significant advantages of multiple vocabularies for one lot 
of concepts.

Otherwise, once again, I can only conclude that Maths (in which for this 
post I include Logic) is in its Tower of Babel phase. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy