Re: Question about Set Theory

["MoeBlee"]

MoeBlee wrote:
> Anyway, set theory
> serves the purpose of axiomatizing ordinary mathematics. It's an
> incomplete theory (if consistent), but still serves as an
> axiomatization.

P.S. Even though set theory is incomplete, it is a FORMAL theory that
is rich enough to at least be capable of "expressing" the mathematical
propositions of concern in ordinary mathematics, even though there are
propositions that set theory can express but can prove neither the
proposition nor its denial.

MoeBlee