|
|
vfilipch ha scritto:
> Is it possible to apply Set Theory for an elment which I would like to
> define as an "unobserved object"? In other words, for an element for
> which there is no way to know ANY properties.
Anything that exists has the property of existing.
Anything that that does not exist has the property of non-existing.
An object has the property of a persistence and distinguishability.
An element has the property of belonging to something.
Anything you can think up has the property that you can think it up.
Anything void of any property is beyond the grasp of human mind.
|
|