Question about Set Theory

sci.logic

Question about Set Theory

from [vfilipch]

Subject:	Question about Set Theory
From:	"vfilipch"
Date:	3 Aug 2006 09:14:41 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.logic

I would like to hear a opinion of prfessionals (because I am not one)
on the following question:

Is it possible to apply Set Theory for an elment which I would like to
define as an "unobserved object"? In other words, for an element for
which there is no way to know ANY properties.

Thanks in advance.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Question about Set Theory, vfilipch <= Re: Question about Set Theory, Rupert Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb Re: Question about Set Theory, Patricia Shanahan Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb

Previous by Date:	Re: A curiousity, wit
Next by Date:	Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
Previous by Thread:	(Tit_for_Tat) The Prisoner's Dilemma Explained & Iterated, Immortalist
Next by Thread:	Re: Question about Set Theory, Rupert
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]