sci.logic (thread)

Scott on CH in 2nd order set theory, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/30
- Re: Scott on CH in 2nd order set theory, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/30
  - Re: Scott on CH in 2nd order set theory, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/30
Connectivity of a graph in FO, un student, 2006/06/29
- Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, William Elliot, 2006/06/29
  - Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, un student, 2006/06/29
    - Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, un student, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, William Elliot, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, un student, 2006/06/30
    - Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, William Elliot, 2006/06/30
- Re: Connectivity of a graph in FO, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/30
sequence sum, karthik, 2006/06/28
- Re: sequence sum, David W . Cantrell, 2006/06/28
Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/27
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Peter Webb, 2006/06/27
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, david petry, 2006/06/27
    - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, david petry, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/28
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/28
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Peter Webb, 2006/06/28
    - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, abo, 2006/06/28
    - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, abo, 2006/06/28
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/28
    - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Patrick, 2006/06/29
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/28
    - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Peter Webb, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Rupert, 2006/06/29
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Peter Niessen, 2006/06/28
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, Ralf Bader, 2006/06/28
- Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, William of Ockham, 2006/06/29
  - Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, William of Ockham, 2006/06/29
REFUTATION OF CT-THESIS FROM CLASSICAL LOGIC, LauLuna, 2006/06/27
IN ENGLISCH:A table of Mechanics. Schema:, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/06/26
IN SWEDISCH:Mekanikens indelning. Schema:, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/06/26
Re: <=> same as <-> ?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/26
Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, darwinist, 2006/06/26
- Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, Brian Fletcher, 2006/06/26
  - Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, donstockbauer, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, Brian Fletcher, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, A N Niel, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, Brian Fletcher, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, Roger Johansson, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, darwinist, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, darwinist, 2006/06/26
- Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, Immortalist, 2006/06/27
  - Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, darwinist, 2006/06/29
- Re: Why Computer Science is the Best Science for a Scientist, tohentoon, 2006/06/29
Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/25
- Re: Potential Things, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/26
  - Re: Potential Things, abo, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, abo, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
      
      Thinking about the context, George Dance, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
  - "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), George Dance, 2006/06/26
    - Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Frederick Williams, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", abo, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Frederick Williams, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", abo, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Frederick Williams, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", george, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing", George Dance, 2006/06/29
    - Re: "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), George Dance, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), MoeBlee, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: "Torkel Bashing" (was: Potential Things), George Dance, 2006/06/29
  - Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Potential Things, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
- Re: Potential Things, george, 2006/06/26
  - Re: Potential Things, george, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
  - Re: Potential Things, George Dance, 2006/06/26
The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, a_plutonium, 2006/06/25
- WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Roger Coppock, 2006/06/25
  - Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, a_plutonium, 2006/06/25
    - Sociopath News Just for "Archimedes Plutonium" -- Special Treat: Murder-Suicides, Psychopaths News Service, 2006/06/25
    - Re: Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Jik Bombo, 2006/06/25
      
      Psycho News Just for Jik Bombo : Today's Special: Murder-Suicides Violent Crimes, Psychopaths News Service, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Roger Coppock, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Jik Bombo, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Eric Swanson, 2006/06/25
    - Re: Roger Coppock debunks Global Cooling Re: WARNING! CRACKPOT ALERT!, Lloyd Parker, 2006/06/26
- Aluminum Sequin to match the cool summer of 1992; Pinatuba Re: The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, a_plutonium, 2006/06/26
- Re: The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/26
  - Re: The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, a_plutonium, 2006/06/26
    - Re: The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: The World's 4 top priority problems as of 2006 and what to do about them, a_plutonium, 2006/06/27
Japan, by sending ships to North Korea, is acting like a primitive M.A.D. Fleet and doing the correct thing, a_plutonium, 2006/06/25
- The UN needs a regime change SWAT team department Re: Japan, by sending ships to North Korea, is acting like a primitive M.A.D. Fleet and doing the correct thing, a_plutonium, 2006/06/25
  - Re: The UN needs a regime change SWAT team department Re: Japan, by sending ships to North Korea, is acting like a primitive M.A.D. Fleet and doing the correct thing, a_plutonium, 2006/06/25
Re: the "Robotic Mule".........incredible Robotic achievement, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
- Re: the "Robotic Mule".........incredible Robotic achievement, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
  - Re: the "Robotic Mule".........incredible Robotic achievement, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
- Re: the "Robotic Mule".........incredible Robotic achievement, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
What's wrong with this argument in ZF?, mmweiss, 2006/06/24
- Re: What's wrong with this argument in ZF?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/24
  - Re: What's wrong with this argument in ZF?, mmweiss, 2006/06/24
    - Re: What's wrong with this argument in ZF?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/25
- Re: What's wrong with this argument in ZF?, Rupert, 2006/06/26
Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [11], Conbra, 2006/06/23
CHRIST ARRESTED FOLLOWING DIVINE JOURNEY, HOLY MISSION, Raymond Karczewski, 2006/06/23
- Message not available
  - Re: CHRIST ARRESTED FOLLOWING DIVINE JOURNEY, HOLY MISSION, Zapanaz, 2006/06/24
- Re: CHRIST ARRESTED FOLLOWING DIVINE JOURNEY, HOLY MISSION, Kevin Cunningham, 2006/06/24
post's correspondence problem, yarden . katz, 2006/06/22
- Re: post's correspondence problem, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/23
When does p imply q?, herbzet, 2006/06/22
- Re: When does p imply q?, Newberry, 2006/06/22
  - Re: When does p imply q?, herbzet, 2006/06/23
    - Re: When does p imply q?, Newberry, 2006/06/23
- Re: When does p imply q?, herbzet, 2006/06/23
  - Re: When does p imply q?, herbzet, 2006/06/24
- Re: When does p imply q?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/24
Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [9], Conbra, 2006/06/21
A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/21
- Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, William Elliot, 2006/06/21
  - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/06/21
    - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, William Elliot, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, William Elliot, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, William Elliot, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, William Elliot, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
- Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, user13, 2006/06/22
  - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/23
    - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Pastor Kutchie, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/24
- Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
  - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/24
    - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Jan Burse, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Jan Burse, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/26
- Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
  - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
    - Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: A definition of 'two' (2) please?, John Jones, 2006/06/25
A universal introduction rule, Litania, 2006/06/21
- Re: A universal introduction rule, William Elliot, 2006/06/21
  - Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania, 2006/06/22
    - Re: A universal introduction rule, William Elliot, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania, 2006/06/22
  - Re: A universal introduction rule, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/22
- Re: A universal introduction rule, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/22
  - Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania, 2006/06/22
    - Re: A universal introduction rule, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/23
- Re: A universal introduction rule, tohentoon, 2006/06/23
  - Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania, 2006/06/24
Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [8], Conbra, 2006/06/20
- Re: Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [8], William Elliot, 2006/06/20
  - Re: Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [8], makc . the . great, 2006/06/21
Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Joe Cool, 2006/06/20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Peter Niessen, 2006/06/23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 2006/06/29
  - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, MoeBlee, 2006/06/29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 2006/06/29
  - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 2006/06/29
    - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 2006/06/30
  - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 2006/06/29
    - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 2006/06/30
  - Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Peter Niessen, 2006/06/30
Alexander Zinovjev, makc . the . great, 2006/06/20
partial orders, Per Freem, 2006/06/19
- Re: partial orders, William Elliot, 2006/06/19
- Re: partial orders, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/20
  - Re: partial orders, William Elliot, 2006/06/20
  - Re: partial orders, Per Freem, 2006/06/20
    - Re: partial orders, Arturo Magidin, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: partial orders, Per Freem, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: partial orders, Arturo Magidin, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: partial orders, William Elliot, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: partial orders, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/21
    - Re: partial orders, Arturo Magidin, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: partial orders, William Elliot, 2006/06/20
- Re: partial orders, tohentoon, 2006/06/20
Intensional Boolean Logic, Newberry, 2006/06/19
Re: Sentential logic +, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/18
- Re: Sentential logic +, Owen, 2006/06/21
  - Re: Sentential logic +, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/21
    - Re: Sentential logic +, Owen, 2006/06/21
I n f i n i t i < ! >, INFINITI, 2006/06/18
Frege: Reason's nearest kin, ludolphine, 2006/06/17
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, William of Ockham, 2006/06/17
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Peter_Smith, 2006/06/17
  - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, John Jones, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Barb Knox, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Owen, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Owen, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/26
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/26
    - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, abo, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, abo, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/23
    - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, george, 2006/06/20
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/17
  - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/17
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/17
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, David, 2006/06/17
  - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/17
    - Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/17
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/18
- Re: Frege: Reason's nearest kin, George Dance, 2006/06/24
Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Conbra, 2006/06/16
- Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, William Elliot, 2006/06/17
  - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Conbra, 2006/06/17
    - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, William Elliot, 2006/06/17
- Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/17
  - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Conbra, 2006/06/17
    - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Conbra, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Jan Burse, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Solving equation on Concept Algebra--Answer One a Question, Conbra, 2006/06/19
AN INCOMPATIBILITY OF STRONG AI, LauLuna, 2006/06/16
- Re: AN INCOMPATIBILITY OF STRONG AI, LauLuna, 2006/06/21
decidable, bargiax, 2006/06/16
- Re: decidable, MoeBlee, 2006/06/16
  - Re: decidable, bargiax, 2006/06/16
    - Re: decidable, MoeBlee, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: decidable, bargiax, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: decidable, MoeBlee, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: decidable, bargiax, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: decidable, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: decidable, bargiax, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: decidable, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
FO vs. FO(TC), un student, 2006/06/16
- Re: FO vs. FO(TC), Achim Blumensath, 2006/06/20
- Re: FO vs. FO(TC), Jan Burse, 2006/06/20
  - Re: FO vs. FO(TC), Jan Burse, 2006/06/20
Re: Take A Break..Making $20,000.00 using E-Gold (100% legal), lycquan, 2006/06/16
"Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
- Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Jeffrey Ketland, 2006/06/15
  - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/16
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/16
- Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
  - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/16
- Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/15
  - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/16
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/16
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/16
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/16
  - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/16
    - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Question, 2006/06/28
      
      Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/29
  - Re: "Theorem" in Mendelson ?, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/16
Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/15
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Lee, 2006/06/15
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/15
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Bryan Olson, 2006/06/15
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/16
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Sean, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, extropy1, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Sean, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Bryan Olson, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, extropy1, 2006/06/17
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/15
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/16
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, extropy1, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/17
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Mark Donovan, 2006/06/15
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/15
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/16
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Michael Gray, 2006/06/15
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Immortalist, 2006/06/16
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, John Jones, 2006/06/16
    - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Robert Cohen, 2006/06/16
- Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, Kaniishka, 2006/06/16
  - Re: Reincarnation - Scars & Birthmarks, Proof or Fallacy, extropy1, 2006/06/17
4. Land mammal-whale transition, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/06/14
Mathematics greatest ontological blunder, John Jones, 2006/06/14
- Re: Mathematics greatest ontological blunder, Pastor Kutchie, 2006/06/22
  - Re: Mathematics greatest ontological blunder, John Jones, 2006/06/23
- Re: Mathematics greatest ontological blunder, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
Re: completeness of predicate calculus, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/14
Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [2], Conbra, 2006/06/13
- Re: Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [2], Jan Burse, 2006/06/16
Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [1], Conbra, 2006/06/12
- Re: Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [1], William Elliot, 2006/06/13
  - Re: Back Reasoning from partial Syllogism [1], Conbra, 2006/06/13
LCC'06 submissions deadline extended to June 15, royer, 2006/06/12
Re: Problems with proof (propositional calculus), Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/12
OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/06/12
H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/12
- Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/13
  - Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/13
    - Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: H. Enderton's proof that theory of natural numbers with successor admits elimination of quantifiers, recordmymind, 2006/06/16
Sixteenth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/11
Universal Generalization, Newberry, 2006/06/11
- Re: Universal Generalization, Owen, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Universal Generalization, Newberry, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Universal Generalization, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
- Re: Universal Generalization, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Universal Generalization, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
Re: Why?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
- Re: Why?, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/12
about law of excluded middle, Per Freem, 2006/06/11
- Re: about law of excluded middle, William Elliot, 2006/06/11
- Re: about law of excluded middle, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
- Re: about law of excluded middle, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/11
  - Re: about law of excluded middle, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
Atomic Formulas, Atomic Sentences, Atomic Theories, and Atomic Structures, Blake Manner, 2006/06/10
- Re: Atomic Formulas, Atomic Sentences, Atomic Theories, and Atomic Structures, John Jones, 2006/06/13
  - Re: Atomic Formulas, Atomic Sentences, Atomic Theories, and Atomic Structures, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/13
Advantages of mathematical 'finitism', John Jones, 2006/06/10
Fifteenth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/10
Derivation Problem, Logic Noob, 2006/06/10
- Re: Derivation Problem, Conbra, 2006/06/10
- Re: Derivation Problem, Jeffrey Ketland, 2006/06/10
  - Re: Derivation Problem, Logic Noob, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Derivation Problem, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Derivation Problem, Logic Noob, 2006/06/11
Fourteenth new law from the premises of syllogism is as follows, Conbra, 2006/06/09
Proposition, jonthn, 2006/06/09
A constructivist approach to Sets, John Jones, 2006/06/09
Re: Die Liste aller natürlichen Zahlen existiert NICHT, albstorz, 2006/06/09
Qualia and Numerals, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/09
- Re: Qualia and Numerals, Stephen Harris, 2006/06/09
  - Re: Qualia and Numerals, Kevin Karn, 2006/06/11
- Re: Qualia and Numerals, Stephen Harris, 2006/06/10
A constructivist review of Number, John Jones, 2006/06/08
- Re: A constructivist review of Number, William Elliot, 2006/06/09
  - Re: A constructivist review of Number, John Jones, 2006/06/10
Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/08
- Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Patrick, 2006/06/08
  - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/09
- Re: Philosophical question about empty set, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/09
  - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Paul Holbach, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Russell Easterly, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/12
- Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
  - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Scott, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
    - Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Philosophical question about empty set, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
- Re: Philosophical question about empty set, george, 2006/06/09
Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, John Jones, 2006/06/07
- Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, John Jones, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, John Jones, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/12
- Re: Fun Things about Largest Numbers!, Jan Burse, 2006/06/11
CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Raymond Karczewski, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Rev. James Slaughter, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Kyle, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, sav, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, prairie . squidman, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Preacher Man SODDI, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, MissSouth, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Barb Knox, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Mgr Dry Martini, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Rev. James Slaughter, 2006/06/07
      
      Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, ghugle, 2006/06/07
      
      Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Marconus, 2006/06/08
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Zapanaz, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Razna, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Rev. Lee Austin, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Zapanaz, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, xtians-r-stupid@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Capt. Zeston Norelco, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Roy. Just Roy., 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!! <-- what utter bullshit. And WTF is this doing posted to rec.music.beatles, anyway?, Phoenix Psaltery, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Greg Preston, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, sav, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, scooter, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, just john, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, just john, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Rev. ErRoR, 2006/06/07
  - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, just john, 2006/06/07
    - Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Kyle, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Preacher Man SODDI, 2006/06/07
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, 104, 2006/06/20
Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/06
- Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/07
  - Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/07
    - Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Jan Burse, 2006/06/07
      
      Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Jan Burse, 2006/06/07
    - Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Frederick Williams, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: Eleventh new law from the premises of syllogism, Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/09
adding default rules to a theory in default logic, Per Freem, 2006/06/06
- Re: adding default rules to a theory in default logic, Jan Burse, 2006/06/06
  - Re: adding default rules to a theory in default logic, Per Freem, 2006/06/07
    - Re: adding default rules to a theory in default logic, Jan Burse, 2006/06/07
Re: Tenth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/05
- Re: Tenth new law from the premises of syllogism, Jan Burse, 2006/06/05
A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Conbra, 2006/06/05
- Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Jan Burse, 2006/06/05
  - Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Jan Burse, 2006/06/05
- Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Jan Burse, 2006/06/05
  - Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Conbra, 2006/06/08
    - Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Conbra, 2006/06/09
      
      Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Jan Burse, 2006/06/09
  - Re: A Revolution of Logic Reasoning--A Method of Law Free Reasoning, Conbra, 2006/06/10
Model Theory and Combinatorics and Crytography??, Blake Manner, 2006/06/05
- Re: Model Theory and Combinatorics and Crytography??, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/06
  - Re: Model Theory and Combinatorics and Crytography??, Blake Manner, 2006/06/14
resolution refutation problem, Tommy Str�mhaug, 2006/06/05
- Re: resolution refutation problem, William Elliot, 2006/06/06
  - Re: resolution refutation problem, Tommy Str�mhaug, 2006/06/06
    - Re: resolution refutation problem, William Elliot, 2006/06/07
      
      Re: resolution refutation problem, David Kinny, 2006/06/07
- Re: resolution refutation problem, David Kinny, 2006/06/06
  - Re: resolution refutation problem, Tommy Str�mhaug, 2006/06/07
    - Re: resolution refutation problem, David Kinny, 2006/06/07
Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/05
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Owen, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/30
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/29
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, georgedance04, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      East meets West, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, cbrown, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, galathaea, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/12
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/19
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/26
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/12
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Robert Low, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Chris Menzel, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Timothy Murphy, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, david petry, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, abo, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, abo, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/14
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Nam Nguyen, 2006/06/11
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/12
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/12
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Timothy Murphy, 2006/06/12
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/17
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franz�n is dead, Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/22
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, George Dance, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, examachine, 2006/06/13
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/13
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, examachine, 2006/06/27
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, examachine, 2006/06/27
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, examachine, 2006/06/27
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
    - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, george, 2006/06/20
  - Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, R. Srinivasan, 2006/06/21
What are the values of 2-valued logic?, Owen, 2006/06/04
- Re: What are the values of 2-valued logic?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
Ninth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/06/03
- Re: Ninth new law from the premises of syllogism, Barb Knox, 2006/06/03
Mathematical objects and Discernment, John Jones, 2006/06/03
- Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, LauLuna, 2006/06/03
  - Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, John Jones, 2006/06/03
    - Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, Charlie, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, John Jones, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, LauLuna, 2006/06/04
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, LauLuna, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment, John Jones, 2006/06/06
Re: omega consistency, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/03
- Re: omega consistency, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/03
Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Blake Manner, 2006/06/03
- Re: Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/03
  - Re: Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Blake Manner, 2006/06/13
    - Re: Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Blake Manner, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Infinitely Many Complete 1-Types, Blake Manner, 2006/06/14
Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (Dennett), Immortalist, 2006/06/02
- Re: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (Dennett), Sir Frederick, 2006/06/05
defying physics;please explain, hunnma, 2006/06/02
- Re: defying physics;please explain, Pooh Bear, 2006/06/02
- Re: defying physics;please explain, Allan Matthews, 2006/06/02
- Re: defying physics;please explain, Matt Giwer, 2006/06/02
  - Re: defying physics;please explain, Denis Loubet, 2006/06/03
- Re: defying physics;please explain, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/06/02
  - Re: defying physics;please explain, hunnma, 2006/06/03
    - Re: defying physics;please explain, george, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: defying physics;please explain, Hatunen, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: defying physics;please explain, tgdenning, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: defying physics;please explain, hunnma, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: defying physics;please explain, R.H. Allen, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: defying physics;please explain, barryh46au, 2006/06/15
The Drinkers' Paradox, BuddhaThu, 2006/06/02
- Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Immortalist, 2006/06/02
  - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Bret Cahill, 2006/06/02
  - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, george, 2006/06/02
  - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, george, 2006/06/02
- Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, oneblackline, 2006/06/02
  - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, BuddhaThu, 2006/06/03
    - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, BuddhaThu, 2006/06/03
    - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Immortalist, 2006/06/03
    - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, george, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, BuddhaThu, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Edward Grefenstette, 2006/06/05
    - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, BuddhaThu, 2006/06/05
- Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, roastfreesteel, 2006/06/04
  - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Roger Johansson, 2006/06/04
    - Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, mikegordge, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, Roger Johansson, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: The Drinkers' Paradox, mikegordge, 2006/06/05
Assistance required, nijerian, 2006/06/02
- Re: Assistance required, William Elliot, 2006/06/02
- Re: Assistance required, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
Our Heavenly Father on 9-14-05 at 11:17 A.M., norttene, 2006/06/02
Is Goedel's formula true?, Newberry, 2006/06/02
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/02
  - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Newberry, 2006/06/02
    - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/02
    - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/02
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/02
  - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Newberry, 2006/06/03
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/06/02
  - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/02
    - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/06/02
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/02
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, george, 2006/06/02
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, John Jones, 2006/06/03
- Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, John Jones, 2006/06/03
  - Re: Is Goedel's formula true?, george, 2006/06/03
Validity of formulas with a certain prefix, mordov, 2006/06/01
- Re: Validity of formulas with a certain prefix, William Elliot, 2006/06/02
- Re: Validity of formulas with a certain prefix, Pietro, 2006/06/02
  - Re: Validity of formulas with a certain prefix, Michael De, 2006/06/02
    - Re: Validity of formulas with a certain prefix, Pietro, 2006/06/03
Finitely Many Complete Types, blakman211, 2006/06/01
- Re: Finitely Many Complete Types, blakman211, 2006/06/01
Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/05/31
- Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/01
  - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
    - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/25
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Jan Burse, 2006/06/12
- Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/05/31
  - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/01
- Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/05/31
  - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/01
    - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
- Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/05/31
  - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/01
    - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/26
- Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/05/31
  - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/01
    - Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/18
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
      
      Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem, Charlie-Boo, 2006/06/24
[FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger, 2006/05/31
Fifth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/05/31
- Re: Fifth new law from the premises of syllogism, William Elliot, 2006/05/31
Two questions on First order Model Theory, blakman211, 2006/05/31
- Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/01
  - Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Achim Blumensath, 2006/06/01
    - Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Achim Blumensath, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/02
    - Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, blakman211, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Bertie Reed, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Achim Blumensath, 2006/06/02
  - Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, blakman211, 2006/06/01
    - Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Two questions on First order Model Theory, Blake Manner, 2006/06/02
Fourth new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/05/30
- Re: Fourth new law from the premises of syllogism, William Elliot, 2006/05/30
Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/05/30
- Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism, William Elliot, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism, Conbra, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism, William Elliot, 2006/05/31
Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra, george, 2006/05/30
- Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra, george, 2006/06/02
Re: Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!, Mohamed Al-Dabbagh, 2006/05/30
- Re: Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!, William Elliot, 2006/05/30
Re: Is this right? (New model from old...), David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
- Re: Is this right? (New model from old...), Jeffrey Ketland, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Is this right? (New model from old...), David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/05/30
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/06/05
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Russell Easterly, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Russell Easterly, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/04
      
      Message not available
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/06/07
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/06/08
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/06/10
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], georgie, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], david petry, 2006/05/30
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Barb Knox, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/05/31
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/31
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Pietro, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Patricia Shanahan, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
      
      Message not available
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Newberry, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/11
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why?, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Jack Campin - bogus address, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/20
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Why?, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/12
      
      Re: Why?, MoeBlee, 2006/06/13
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/05/31
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/13
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Chris Menzel, 2006/06/16
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/19
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/21
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/06/23
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], apoorv, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/15
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/06/14
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/05/31
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/05/31
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], William of Ockham, 2006/06/01
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], george, 2006/05/31
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/05
  - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Pietro, 2006/06/05
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Daryl McCullough, 2006/06/06
      
      Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/06/06
    - Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?], MoeBlee, 2006/06/12
Re: Vagueness Again, tjb, 2006/05/30
- Re: Vagueness Again, John Jones, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Vagueness Again, tjb, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Vagueness Again, John Jones, 2006/05/30
- Re: Vagueness Again, tjb, 2006/05/30
- Re: Vagueness Again, William Elliot, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Vagueness Again, tjb, 2006/05/31
    - Re: Vagueness Again, William Elliot, 2006/05/31
Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, tjb, 2006/05/30
- Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, John Jones, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, tjb, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, Paul Holbach, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, John Jones, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, William Elliot, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, John Jones, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, William Elliot, 2006/05/31
- Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2006/06/01
- Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, tjb, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Vague or Ambiguous?, John Jones, 2006/05/30
Re: FO logic without equality, Li Yi, 2006/05/30
- Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
- Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
  - Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
  - Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
  - Re: FO logic without equality, Alan Smaill, 2006/05/30
    - Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/02
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Keith Ramsay, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/04
      
      Message not available
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/05
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/06
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/06
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/07
    - Re: FO logic without equality, Li Yi, 2006/05/31
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Alan Smaill, 2006/06/01
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/02
  - Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
  - Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/05/30
    - Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/03
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, Jan Burse, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/04
- Re: FO logic without equality, David C . Ullrich, 2006/06/03
Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, LauLuna, 2006/05/30
- Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, abo, 2006/05/30
- Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/30
- Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/30
- Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, Daryl McCullough, 2006/05/30
  - Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, LauLuna, 2006/06/04
    - Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, LauLuna, 2006/06/04
      
      Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE, LauLuna, 2006/06/05