sci.logic (thread)

Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh?, Top Cop, 2005/09/25
- Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh?, Top Cop, 2005/09/25
Cubic SAT solvers, Shel L., 2005/09/24
Re: :: semantic realisation in constructivism ::, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/24
- Re: :: semantic realisation in constructivism ::, galathaea, 2005/09/24
What does "Infinity" really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/09/23
Moore's account of Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/23
- Re: Moore's account of Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/23
  - Re: Moore's account of Skolem's Paradox, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/24
- Re: Moore's account of Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/23
Moore on Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/23
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/24
  - Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/24
  - Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox, William of Ockham, 2005/09/24
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/24
Topology of proof, Tom, 2005/09/22
- Re: Topology of proof, galathaea, 2005/09/22
  - Re: Topology of proof, galathaea, 2005/09/23
  - Re: Topology of proof, Tom, 2005/09/23
Goedel's undecidable G, LordBeotian, 2005/09/21
- Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/21
  - Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Kazimierz Kurz, 2005/09/24
    - Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/24
      
      Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/24
      
      Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/24
    - Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/24
    - Re: Goedel's undecidable G, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/24
Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Timothy, 2005/09/20
Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Lantern, 2005/09/19
- Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Jeremy Boden, 2005/09/19
  - Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Lantern, 2005/09/20
    - Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Jeremy Boden, 2005/09/20
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Ron Peterson, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Jeremy Boden, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Les Cargill, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Lantern, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, William F Hummel, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: math formula that measures how much and when our government can go in debt Re: quiz question for graduate students of math, Lantern, 2005/09/22
Language semantics is metalanguage syntax?, andrewspencers, 2005/09/14
- Re: Language semantics is metalanguage syntax?, Barb Knox, 2005/09/14
Russell, the set, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/14
- Re: Russell, the set, Owen, 2005/09/14
Would you accept this arithmetic thesis?, Nam Nguyen, 2005/09/14
- Re: Would you accept this arithmetic thesis?, Barb Knox, 2005/09/14
a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/12
- Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/12
  - Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
- Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/12
  - Re: a simple derivation, Robert Low, 2005/09/13
  - Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
- Re: a simple derivation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/13
  - Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: a simple derivation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/13
    - Re: a simple derivation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: a simple derivation, fractal97, 2005/09/14
- Re: a simple derivation, George Dance, 2005/09/14
Weyl's quote on set theory, david petry, 2005/09/12
- Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 2005/09/12
  - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Owen, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Dik T. Winter, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, |-|erc, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Dik T. Winter, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Bill Dubuque, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Herman Rubin, 2005/09/14
- Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/13
  - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Timothy Murphy, 2005/09/13
    - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
    - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/13
  - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, david petry, 2005/09/13
    - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, david petry, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, |-|erc, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Han de Bruijn, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Herman Rubin, 2005/09/14
    - Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, Han de Bruijn, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, David Kastrup, 2005/09/14
- Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, |-|erc, 2005/09/13
- Re: Weyl's quote on set theory, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/09/14
Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/10
- Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, Proginoskes, 2005/09/11
  - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, Dik T. Winter, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, Proginoskes, 2005/09/13
- Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, G. A. Edgar, 2005/09/11
  - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, G. A. Edgar, 2005/09/12
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/13
- Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, Bill Dubuque, 2005/09/11
  - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, Dik T. Winter, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Prove unique factorization without using negative integers?, MoeBlee, 2005/09/13
Non-standard models of ZF, LordBeotian, 2005/09/10
- Re: Non-standard models of ZF, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/10
Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 2005/09/09
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, , 2005/09/09
  - Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/09
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/09
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/09
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/09
    - Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Barb Knox, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, david petry, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/12
    - Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, george, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/12
Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/08
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/08
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William Elliot, 2005/09/09
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', david petry, 2005/09/10
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/09
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/09
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', george, 2005/09/09
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/09
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/10
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/10
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/11
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/10
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/14
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', MoeBlee, 2005/09/19
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/19
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/20
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/20
      
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/21
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', George Dance, 2005/09/20
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/11
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', george, 2005/09/10
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', david petry, 2005/09/10
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/10
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/11
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Robert Low, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Chris Menzel, 2005/09/13
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', george, 2005/09/13
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', george, 2005/09/18
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/14
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/22
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', William of Ockham, 2005/09/21
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/22
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/22
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/22
      
      Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C. Ullrich, 2005/09/22
- Skolem's 'Paradox', Bill Taylor, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/09
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/20
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/21
    - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/21
- Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/22
  - Re: Skolem's 'Paradox', Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/22
Re: LaTeX (not just) for Logicians, Chris Menzel, 2005/09/08
Axoimatic Proof Help, mitch, 2005/09/07
- Re: Axoimatic Proof Help, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/07
  - Re: Axoimatic Proof Help, mitch, 2005/09/08
- Re: Axiomatic Proof Help, G . Frege, 2005/09/07
  - Re: Axiomatic Proof Help, mitch, 2005/09/08
  - Re: Axiomatic Proof Help, George Dance, 2005/09/09
    - Re: Axiomatic Proof Help, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/09
A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/07
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation, adamgolding, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, adamgolding, 2005/09/09
      
      Message not available
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, adamgolding, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, adamgolding, 2005/09/13
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/14
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Owen, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Owen, 2005/09/08
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, G . Frege, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Lee Rudolph, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Owen, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/08
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Robert Low, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Peter_Smith, 2005/09/08
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Chris Menzel, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, G . Frege, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, G . Frege, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/08
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Robert Low, 2005/09/07
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Robert Low, 2005/09/08
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, futurist, 2005/09/07
- A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, futurist, 2005/09/08
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/08
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, futurist, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, George Dance, 2005/09/09
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, futurist, 2005/09/08
    - Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/08
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation - A More Systematic Approach, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/08
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/08
  - Re: A Brief Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/09
A Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/07
- Re: A Note on Notation, George Dance, 2005/09/07
Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/07
- Re: Basic Axioms, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
  - Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/10
- Re: Basic Axioms, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/07
  - Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/07
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Basic Axioms, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/10
- Re: Basic Axioms, george, 2005/09/07
  - Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/08
    - Re: Basic Axioms, Acme Diagnostics, 2005/09/08
    - Re: Basic Axioms, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/09
  - Re: Basic Axioms, George Dance, 2005/09/11
- Re: Basic Axioms, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/09
Re: :: inaccessibility via barb ::, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/07
Re: There can be no objective justification for our beliefs., Peter_Smith, 2005/09/07
Re: "These statements are false", George Dance, 2005/09/06
unconventional A and E, Allan Adler, 2005/09/05
- Re: unconventional A and E, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/05
- Re: unconventional A and E, Jeffrey Ketland, 2005/09/07
A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, Newbie, 2005/09/05
- Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/05
- Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, George Dance, 2005/09/05
  - Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/07
- Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, William Elliot, 2005/09/05
  - Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, George Dance, 2005/09/06
- Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q, Barb Knox, 2005/09/05
*# algebraic constructivism #*, galathaea, 2005/09/04
- Re: *# algebraic constructivism #*, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/04
Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page, george, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Aatu Koskensilta, 2005/09/05
  - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/05
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, george, 2005/09/07
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Robert Low, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Jim Spriggs, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, george, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Robert Low, 2005/09/04
    - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/06
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Darko Aleksic, 2005/09/06
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/07
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/07
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/07
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, jirka, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, slaterbh, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, slaterbh, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Anti-diagonalist page, William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
    - Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/04
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page, slaterbh, 2005/09/04
provably unprovable?, gsax, 2005/09/03
- Re: provably unprovable?, Robert Low, 2005/09/03
- Re: provably unprovable?, george, 2005/09/03
  - Re: provably unprovable?, gsax, 2005/09/04
    - Re: provably unprovable?, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/04
- Re: provably unprovable?, Michael De, 2005/09/04
  - Re: provably unprovable?, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/05
    - Re: provably unprovable?, Michael De, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: provably unprovable?, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/08
Visit 'We the Thinking', nathanhawking, 2005/09/03
- Visit 'We the Thinking', nathanhawking, 2005/09/03
Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), JBL, 2005/09/02
- Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Peter_Smith, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Owen, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Robert J. Kolker, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Owen, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Robert J. Kolker, 2005/09/02
      
      cancelling postings Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Robert Low, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Owen, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), George Dance, 2005/09/06
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Owen, 2005/09/06
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), George Dance, 2005/09/06
  - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Robert J. Kolker, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), William Elliot, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), Peter_Smith, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), William Elliot, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), George Dance, 2005/09/06
- Re: Proof of p ^ !q |- !(p v q), William Elliot, 2005/09/02
A new definition to "Truth" !, caesarjbsquitti, 2005/09/01
Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/01
- Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Proginoskes, 2005/09/01
- Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/01
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Chris Menzel, 2005/09/01
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Michael Gray, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2005/09/06
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/04
    - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Jesse F. Hughes, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), David Kastrup, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Jesse F. Hughes, 2005/09/04
- Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Robert Low, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Robert Low, 2005/09/04
- Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Jesse F. Hughes, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Lee Rudolph, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Michael Gray, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), Jesse F. Hughes, 2005/09/03
- Message not available
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), William of Ockham, 2005/09/02
- Message not available
  - Re: Mathematical creationism (re-post), david petry, 2005/09/03
Cantor's Diagonal Argument, William of Ockham, 2005/09/01
- Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Peter Webb, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, William of Ockham, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/05
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ken Quirici, 2005/09/08
    - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ken Quirici, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ken Quirici, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ken Quirici, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/11
- Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/09/02
- Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, Colin, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, William of Ockham, 2005/09/02
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, george, 2005/09/03
- Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, george, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, William of Ockham, 2005/09/03
    - Re: Cantor's Diagonal Argument, george, 2005/09/03
Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, adamgolding, 2005/09/01
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/01
  - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, futurist, 2005/09/05
    - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, futurist, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/06
      
      Message not available
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/06
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, adamgolding, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/08
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, adamgolding, 2005/09/01
  - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Chris Menzel, 2005/09/01
    - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Chris Menzel, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, futurist, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Chris Menzel, 2005/09/05
    - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, futurist, 2005/09/05
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, adamgolding, 2005/09/01
  - reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/02
    - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/04
      
      Message not available
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/04
    - Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, futurist, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 2005/09/05
Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Bill Taylor, 2005/09/01
- Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/01
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/01
    - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Robert Low, 2005/09/06
      
      Message not available
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Robert Low, 2005/09/07
- Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/01
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Lee Rudolph, 2005/09/01
- Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/01
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/02
    - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/07
- Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, david petry, 2005/09/01
- Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Neil W Rickert, 2005/09/03
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/05
    - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Herman Jurjus, 2005/09/05
- Message not available
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/07
- Message not available
  - Re: Humanistic mathematics: response to David Petry, Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/07
All students either go to a party or work, but not both - predicate logic?, David, 2005/08/31
- Re: All students either go to a party or work, but not both - predicate logic?, William Elliot, 2005/08/31
- Re: All students either go to a party or work, but not both - predicate logic?, poopdeville, 2005/08/31
  - Re: All students either go to a party or work, but not both - predicate logic?, David, 2005/08/31
- Re: All students either go to a party or work, but not both - predicate logic?, George Dance, 2005/09/01
[FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger, 2005/08/31
Re: Non-standard models of PA, george, 2005/08/31
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, george, 2005/08/31
  - Re: Non-standard models of PA, Torkel Franzen, 2005/08/31
    - Re: Non-standard models of PA, george, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: Non-standard models of PA, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/04
      
      Re: Non-standard models of PA, george, 2005/09/04
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/02
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/03
Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Alan Smaill, 2005/08/31
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/05
Re: ?? truth as provability ??, galathaea, 2005/08/31
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??, Torkel Franzen, 2005/08/31
  - Re: ?? truth as provability ??, galathaea, 2005/09/01
    - Re: ?? truth as provability ??, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: ?? truth as provability ??, galathaea, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: ?? truth as provability ??, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: ?? truth as provability ??, galathaea, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: ?? truth as provability ??, Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/02
Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/08/31
- Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/04
  - Re: Existence and presupposition, G . Frege, 2005/09/04
    - Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/07
- Re: Existence and presupposition, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/04
  - Re: Existence and presupposition, G . Frege, 2005/09/04
- Re: Existence and presupposition, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/04
  - Re: Existence and presupposition, G . Frege, 2005/09/04
    - Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/09
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/11
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/12
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/13
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/07
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, William of Ockham, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, Paul Holbach, 2005/09/08
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/10
      
      Re: Existence and presupposition, george, 2005/09/10
Re: .999... = 1, Ken Quirici, 2005/08/31
- Re: .999... = 1, MoeBlee, 2005/08/31
The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/08/30
- Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Colin, 2005/09/01
  - Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/01
    - Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Chris Menzel, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Chris Menzel, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Lee Rudolph, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Chris Menzel, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Torkel Franzen, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), David C . Ullrich, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Acme Diagnostics, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Chris Menzel, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), 1Z, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), 1Z, 2005/09/05
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Ken Quirici, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Ken Quirici, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Ken Quirici, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Ken Quirici, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), Ken Quirici, 2005/09/03
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), 1Z, 2005/09/02
- Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), berry, 2005/09/02
  - Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
    - Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), 1Z, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), 1Z, 2005/09/05
    - Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), berry, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: The logic troubles of Alan Sokal and Richard Dawkins (the "Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/09/02
Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Barb Knox, 2005/08/30
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 2005/08/31
  - Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Torkel Franzen, 2005/08/31
    - Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 2005/09/01
  - Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Barb Knox, 2005/08/31
    - Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 2005/09/01
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, george, 2005/08/31
  - Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 2005/09/03
Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 2005/08/30
- Re: Constructive Math query., LordBeotian, 2005/08/31
  - Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 2005/09/01
    - Re: Constructive Math query., LordBeotian, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: Constructive Math query., Barb Knox, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 2005/09/01
      
      Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 2005/09/02
      
      Re: Constructive Math query., Keith Ramsay, 2005/09/02
- Constructive Math query., Bill Taylor, 2005/08/31
  - Constructive Math query., William Elliot, 2005/08/31
  - Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 2005/08/31
Re: Nonfirstorderizability, george, 2005/08/30
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, William of Ockham, 2005/08/31
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, George Dance, 2005/09/05
  - Re: Nonfirstorderizability, george, 2005/09/05
    - Re: Nonfirstorderizability, George Dance, 2005/09/06