sci.logic (date)
August 30, 2005
- ?? truth as provability ??, galathaea, 15:45
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, William of Ockham, 15:31
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, William of Ockham, 15:24
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., berry, 15:06
- Re: Ping Herbert B. Enderton, Jim Spriggs, 13:58
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, H. Enderton, 13:50
- Re: Ping Herbert B. Enderton, H. Enderton, 13:45
- Ping Herbert B. Enderton, Jim Spriggs, 13:08
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Jim Spriggs, 12:07
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 09:49
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 09:42
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 09:36
- Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 08:10
- Re: .999... = 1, mtx014, 07:44
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 07:19
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 07:14
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 07:08
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., MoeBlee, 03:55
- Re: .999... = 1, MoeBlee, 03:13
- Re: .999... = 1, Robert Low, 03:11
- Re: .999... = 1, MoeBlee, 02:38
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Torkel Franzen, 01:26
- Re: .999... = 1, MoeBlee, 01:21
- Non-standard models of PA, Bill Taylor, 00:59
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., Torkel Franzen, 00:08
August 29, 2005
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 21:33
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Chris Menzel, 19:32
- Re: .999... = 1, Jim Spriggs, 19:31
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Barb Knox, 18:53
- Re: .999... = 1, Robert Low, 18:48
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, H. Enderton, 18:46
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 18:19
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 18:12
- Re: .999... = 1, David C . Ullrich, 18:11
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Jim Spriggs, 17:25
- Re: An instance of Russell's paradox?, Douglas Eagleson, 16:04
- Re: .999... = 1, Robert Low, 16:03
- Re: .999... = 1, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:42
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., MoeBlee, 15:17
- An instance of Russell's paradox?, A.T., 14:46
- Re: .999... = 1, Hero . van . Jindelt, 14:46
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., Torkel Franzen, 14:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, William of Ockham, 14:26
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, LordBeotian, 14:23
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., MoeBlee, 14:22
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Daryl McCullough, 14:11
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, H. Enderton, 13:58
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., Torkel Franzen, 13:58
- Re: Vague question on mixed quantifiers., H. Enderton, 13:55
- Re: Non-standard models of PA, Torkel Franzen, 13:26
August 28, 2005
- Re: Shoenfield, george, 17:23
- Re: Shoenfield, george, 17:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 17:14
- Re: Constructive Math query., Pierre Asselin, 17:13
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, george, 17:10
- Re: Toward a resolution of Goldbach Conjecture., george, 17:03
- Re: Toward a resolution of Goldbach Conjecture., george, 16:56
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, adamgolding, 16:56
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, William of Ockham, 13:52
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, Ken Quirici, 12:27
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum,, Ken Quirici, 12:12
- introducing, tag22, 11:03
- Re: Constructive Math query., Lee Rudolph, 07:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, William of Ockham, 04:06
- Re: Constructive Math query., Keith Ramsay, 00:31
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 00:22
August 27, 2005
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum, William Elliot, 23:47
- Re: Toward a resolution of Goldbach Conjecture., Nam Nguyen, 19:08
- Toward a resolution of Goldbach Conjecture., Nam Nguyen, 19:05
- Re: Constructive Math query., Pierre Asselin, 18:46
- traditional name for gensler's syllogism? what about nand, etc?, adamgolding, 16:00
- St. Alphonsus Liguori on 3-29-96, gueillan, 15:10
- Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 10:28
- Re: Shoenfield, Torkel Franzen, 07:42
- Re: Shoenfield, Anonymous, 07:17
- Re: What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?, Keith Ramsay, 04:12
- Re: Shoenfield, Torkel Franzen, 03:20
- Constructive Math query., Bill Taylor, 01:23
August 26, 2005
- Re: Shoenfield, george, 21:18
- Re: What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?, george, 21:04
- Re: Shoenfield, H. Enderton, 18:50
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:32
- Re: Shoenfield, Torkel Franzen, 14:04
- Re: Shoenfield, george, 14:01
- Re: Shoenfield, george, 13:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 13:44
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:05
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:46
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Patrick, 10:39
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:45
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:36
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:35
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:27
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:25
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:15
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:13
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:08
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 08:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", David C . Ullrich, 08:20
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 08:12
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 08:00
- Re: Shoenfield, Torkel Franzen, 07:37
- GRAVITY MECHANICS, ACE, 07:20
- Shoenfield, Anonymous, 06:43
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 04:53
August 25, 2005
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:50
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:10
- Re: completeness and soundness, Hung Nguyen, 21:56
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, William Elliot, 21:30
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, Jim Spriggs, 20:41
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, Jim Spriggs, 16:57
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 16:00
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 15:27
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 15:11
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, Corey White, 13:36
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 12:43
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 11:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:27
- Re: completeness and soundness, Nam Nguyen, 09:13
- Re: completeness and soundness, David C . Ullrich, 07:49
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 06:57
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:31
- completeness and soundness, Hung Nguyen, 04:21
- Fuzzy Arithmetic, William Elliot, 04:16
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 04:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 02:31
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 01:18
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, Corey White, 00:49
- posting 20050824, gino_k, 00:28
August 24, 2005
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, William Elliot, 21:31
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, Pierre Asselin, 20:35
- posting 20050824, joe_d625, 19:03
- Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 18:16
- Re: completeness and soundness, Colin, 16:17
- Re: a new game for the world to play-- Crossword Priority Puzzles, a_plutonium, 16:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:53
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 15:52
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 15:44
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 15:39
- Re: completeness and soundness, Jim Spriggs, 14:21
- Re: completeness and soundness, Chris Menzel, 14:06
- Re: completeness and soundness, Torkel Franzen, 13:55
- Re: completeness and soundness, William Elliot, 13:52
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 12:42
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 12:42
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 12:05
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:33
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:30
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:29
- Re: Constructive Math query., Daryl McCullough, 09:10
- Re: "Friendly Premises", David C . Ullrich, 08:11
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 08:07
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 07:00
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:52
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:46
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:40
- Re: "Friendly Premises", poopdeville, 05:21
- Re: Fuzzy Arithmetic, William Elliot, 03:26
- Fuzzy Arithmetic, CoreyWhite, 02:26
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 00:06
August 23, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 19:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 19:29
- Re: Branching quantifiers., george, 18:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:28
- Re: "Friendly Premises", ram, 17:01
- Re: "Friendly Premises", ram, 17:00
- Re: Constructive Math query., Jim Spriggs, 16:46
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 16:09
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 16:03
- Re: Yo, Tory Christman, Barbara Schwarz, 13:49
- Re: Yo, Tory Christman, Barbara Schwarz, 13:11
- Re: "Friendly Premises", David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 02:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 02:47
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 00:39
August 22, 2005
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 22:53
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 22:32
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 19:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 18:01
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 15:44
- Re: a new game for the world to play-- Crossword Priority Puzzles, a_plutonium, 14:00
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:40
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 13:12
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:08
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 08:39
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 07:04
- Re: Constructive Math query., Keith Ramsay, 05:42
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:20
- Re: 'Life's simple, religion makes it complicated', Sir Frederick, 04:31
- Re: 'Life's simple, religion makes it complicated', William Elliot, 03:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 02:46
- 'Life's simple, religion makes it complicated', gunajaring, 01:19
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 00:39
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 00:11
August 21, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 23:32
- Constructive Math query., Bill Taylor, 23:15
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 21:58
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 21:18
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Bob LeChevalier, 20:57
- Re: Constructive Math query., Keith Ramsay, 19:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 18:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 18:42
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, george, 18:16
- Re: What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?, george, 18:00
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 17:26
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 17:11
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 15:01
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, George Dance, 14:58
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 14:41
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 11:35
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:42
- Re: Constructive Math query., Torkel Franzen, 10:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 08:21
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Acme Diagnostics, 06:44
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 05:21
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 01:19
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Gray Shockley, 00:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 00:08
August 20, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:45
- Re: Constructive Math query., david petry, 18:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, A Nony Mouse, 13:49
- a new game for the world to play-- Crossword Priority Puzzles, a_plutonium, 13:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 12:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 11:13
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jesse Alama, 11:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 09:58
- The penis is way too delicate for masturbation, dgr140, 07:51
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Acme Diagnostics, 00:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 00:28
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 00:28
August 19, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 19:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 18:28
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jesse Alama, 18:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, A Nony Mouse, 17:50
- Re: Question about arithmetical hierarchy notation, Jim Spriggs, 17:07
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 16:47
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Acme Diagnostics, 16:23
- Re: Question about arithmetical hierarchy notation, H. Enderton, 16:04
- Re: Unbounded minimization, H. Enderton, 15:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:06
- Unbounded minimization, Snis Pilbor, 12:50
- Question about arithmetical hierarchy notation, Snis Pilbor, 12:43
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, mimus, 12:30
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, George Dance, 12:01
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, George Dance, 11:45
- Re: Sham "Educational Reform" in the United States, Cary Kittrell, 11:09
August 12, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 11:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 11:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 11:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 02:10
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 00:36
August 11, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 23:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 20:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 20:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 20:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 18:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 18:26
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 18:20
- Is this book any good?, Robert Low, 18:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 18:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 17:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 17:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 16:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 14:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 13:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 12:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 12:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 12:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 10:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 08:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 08:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 07:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 07:48
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 07:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 07:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 02:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 01:11
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 00:55
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 00:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 00:30
August 10, 2005
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Keith Ramsay, 22:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 20:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 19:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 18:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 18:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 18:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 17:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 17:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 16:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Alan Morgan, 16:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 16:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 16:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 16:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 15:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 15:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 15:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 15:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 14:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 14:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 14:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 14:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:14
- Job Opportunity: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Chief Scientist, angnoelnelson, 14:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jiri Lebl, 14:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 12:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 11:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 09:39
- Tony Orlow's Quantifier Dyslexia, Daryl McCullough, 07:04
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 05:12
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 05:03
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 04:30
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 04:14
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 04:00
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 02:13
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Keith Ramsay, 00:51
August 09, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 23:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 23:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:46
- re: Worlds Top Scientists Ponder.., Acme Diagnostics, 22:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 20:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 19:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 18:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 17:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Alan Morgan, 16:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 16:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 16:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 16:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 15:40
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 15:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 15:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 15:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 14:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eddie Cantor, 14:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:31
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 14:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 14:08
- Tony's Contradiction of the Day, Daryl McCullough, 14:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 13:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 13:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 13:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 12:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 12:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 12:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 12:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 12:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 12:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 12:01
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 11:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:58
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 11:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 11:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 11:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 11:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 11:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 09:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 08:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 07:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 07:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 07:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 06:41
- Re: Introduction to Lambek-Calculus, Stephen Harris, 05:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 04:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:16
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 01:33
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 01:14
August 08, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:36
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 20:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:18
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 18:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 17:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 17:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 17:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 17:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 17:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 17:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 17:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 17:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 16:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 16:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eddie Cantor, 16:46
- Re: Introduction to Lambek-Calculus, emjotde, 16:12
- Re: Introduction to Lambek-Calculus, r.e.s., 16:05
- Re: Introduction to Lambek-Calculus, r.e.s., 15:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 15:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ken Quirici, 15:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 14:55
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Eddie Cantor, 14:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eddie Cantor, 14:38
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 14:29
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Eddie Cantor, 14:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:22
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Eddie Cantor, 14:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 14:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, aeo6, 14:05
- Introduction to Lambek-Calculus, emjotde, 13:45
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Chris Menzel, 13:09
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Ken Quirici, 10:10
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 07:26
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 07:21
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, George Dance, 06:44
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 06:29
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Chris Menzel, 04:00
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 03:46
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 03:41
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 03:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 03:27
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 03:22
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 03:12
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 02:59
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 02:44
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Chris Menzel, 02:38
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 02:22
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 02:20
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 02:15
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 01:31
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 01:19
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 01:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:01
August 07, 2005
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 22:27
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Keith Ramsay, 21:46
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 20:31
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Keith Ramsay, 20:04
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 18:50
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 18:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:13
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 16:16
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 14:57
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Eddie Cantor, 14:30
- Re: Weird problem, Lee Rudolph, 14:00
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 09:17
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 07:01
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 06:07
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 05:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eddie Cantor, 05:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eddie Cantor, 05:39
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Keith Ramsay, 04:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:49
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:46
- Re: Nonfirstorderizability, Torkel Franzen, 02:08
- Nonfirstorderizability, Michael De, 01:12
- Re: Weird problem, Torkel Franzen, 01:10
August 06, 2005
- Re: Weird problem, Keith Ramsay, 23:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 21:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 20:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 20:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jim Burns, 19:37
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Daryl McCullough, 14:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 14:42
- Re: Selling a soul online?, Keith Ramsay, 13:53
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 13:26
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Herman Jurjus, 11:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:48
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:31
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:21
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 11:00
- Re: Polish foundations?, Jim Spriggs, 10:10
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 04:49
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 04:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David McAnally, 02:02
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 01:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David McAnally, 01:09
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 00:44
August 05, 2005
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:35
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:31
- Re: Polish foundations?, Paul Holbach, 21:32
- Re: Polish foundations?, Paul Holbach, 21:27
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Lee Rudolph, 19:59
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 19:23
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 18:02
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 18:02
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:27
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:09
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 16:06
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 16:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:02
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 15:54
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 15:51
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Torkel Franzen, 15:50
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:47
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:44
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 15:36
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 15:35
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 15:31
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:29
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:20
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Torkel Franzen, 14:47
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 14:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:32
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Torkel Franzen, 13:57
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 13:56
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 13:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:48
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 13:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 13:30
- Re: Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Torkel Franzen, 13:16
- Kook's logic unfalsifiability device: "Ambiguity of language", Acme Diagnostics, 13:13
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 13:02
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:00
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 12:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 12:57
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 12:17
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert Low, 12:10
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:55
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Daryl McCullough, 11:32
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:33
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 09:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 07:41
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 07:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, RickO, 06:36
- August caption competition, dav01, 03:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 01:24
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), denis feldmann, 00:11
August 04, 2005
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:18
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Ross A. Finlayson, 23:06
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), cbrown, 22:38
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Timothy Little, 21:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:25
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Pierre Asselin, 20:32
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 20:10
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Chris Menzel, 19:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 18:16
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 17:34
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 16:22
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:15
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), H. Enderton, 16:11
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), denis feldmann, 16:09
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 16:06
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), cbrown, 15:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:51
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 15:32
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 15:24
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:36
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jim Spriggs, 14:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Seaman, 13:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 13:44
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), David Bernier, 13:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David McAnally, 12:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 12:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Seaman, 12:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, RickO, 12:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 11:59
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 11:53
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert Low, 11:48
- Re: "Friendly Premises", H. J. Sander Bruggink, 11:35
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:19
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Chris Menzel, 11:08
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 10:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 10:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 10:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 10:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 09:57
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 09:20
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert Low, 09:20
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 09:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Seaman, 09:14
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), denis feldmann, 08:57
- Re: "Friendly Premises", H. J. Sander Bruggink, 05:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 05:31
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Timothy Little, 04:52
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 04:47
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 04:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 04:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 04:14
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert Low, 03:55
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 03:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:47
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 03:44
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 03:28
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), quasi, 03:20
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), David McAnally, 03:02
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), denis feldmann, 03:01
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:23
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), denis feldmann, 02:01
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 01:45
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 01:22
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Gerry Myerson, 00:57
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:56
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 00:55
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:45
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 00:32
August 03, 2005
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 23:51
- Re: "Friendly Premises", dchris, 23:45
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), cbrown, 23:42
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 23:09
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 22:51
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:35
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert E. Beaudoin, 22:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 20:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:41
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 19:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 19:11
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 18:37
- Re: well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Robert Low, 18:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 18:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:01
- well- versus regular ordering of R (was, a crank thread), Lee Rudolph, 17:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:48
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jim Spriggs, 16:05
- Re: Polish foundations?, Jim Spriggs, 14:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 12:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:52
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:50
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:45
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 11:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 11:26
- Re: Polish foundations?, Jeffrey Ketland, 11:26
- Re: "Friendly Premises", H. J. Sander Bruggink, 11:22
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 10:54
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:32
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 10:24
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 10:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 10:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 09:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:53
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 09:51
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:43
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 09:36
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:26
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 09:19
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:06
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 09:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 07:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 07:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 07:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 06:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 06:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 05:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 05:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 04:58
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 04:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 03:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 02:27
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 01:10
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 00:36
August 02, 2005
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 23:47
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 23:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 23:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 23:05
- Re: Selling a soul online?, William Elliot, 22:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ken Quirici, 21:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ken Quirici, 21:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 18:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 16:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 15:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 15:34
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 15:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 14:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 14:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 14:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:27
- Polish foundations?, Jim Spriggs, 14:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 13:53
- Selling a soul online?, Vitiare, 13:37
- Selling a soul online?, vitiare, 13:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 11:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), sradhakr, 11:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, poespam-trap, 10:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 10:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 07:44
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 07:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 07:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 06:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 06:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 06:22
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, timm, 06:21
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, |-|erc, 05:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 04:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 04:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 01:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 01:20
- Re: How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 01:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:56
- How would we formalize this concept?, Nam Nguyen, 00:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 00:41
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 00:15
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 00:10
August 01, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 23:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:15
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 22:59
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 22:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 21:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 21:02
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 20:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 20:30
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 20:22
- Re: "Friendly Premises", George Dance, 20:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), george, 19:41
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Martin Shobe, 18:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 18:26
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 17:23
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 17:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 17:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 15:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 15:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:12
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 15:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 14:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 14:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 13:59
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:38
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 13:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 11:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 10:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:06
- Re: OT: Anyone here watch Ripley's Believe it or not?, Joe, 09:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 07:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 07:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 03:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 03:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:03
- Re: Weird problem, Torkel Franzen, 02:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:24
- Re: "Friendly Premises", dchris, 01:09
July 31, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 22:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 21:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 20:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jim Burns, 20:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:50
- Re: Weird problem, Keith Ramsay, 20:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Lee Rudolph, 18:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 18:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 18:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 17:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 17:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:25
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Martin Shobe, 16:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:30
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 16:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 15:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 15:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: Cardinals for Tony, Tony, 15:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 14:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 14:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 12:52
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Martin Shobe, 10:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:41
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 10:25
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jim Spriggs, 10:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jim Spriggs, 10:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Rainer Rosenthal, 10:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 09:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 09:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 09:38
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 09:18
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 09:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 08:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 08:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", timm, 08:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 05:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 05:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:58
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 02:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 00:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 00:28
July 30, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 23:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 22:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 22:43
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jesse Alama, 22:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 22:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 21:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 21:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 20:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 20:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 20:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 18:02
Privacy Policy