sci.logic (date)
July 30, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 17:48
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 17:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:05
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Jesse Alama, 16:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 16:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 16:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:17
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 16:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 16:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:08
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 16:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 14:59
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 14:56
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 14:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 14:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 14:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 14:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jim Burns, 14:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 14:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 14:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:55
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 13:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 13:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 13:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 13:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 13:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 13:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 13:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jim Burns, 13:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 13:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 13:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 12:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 12:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:23
- Re: "Friendly Premises", timm, 11:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 11:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 11:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 11:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:00
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 10:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:35
- Re: "eventually" and "sometimes" in Temporal logic, Paul Holbach, 10:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:23
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 10:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 09:37
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 09:09
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Ross A. Finlayson, 08:50
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Herman Jurjus, 08:49
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Torkel Franzen, 07:14
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Acme Diagnostics, 06:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 05:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 03:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 02:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 01:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 01:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 00:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 00:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 00:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 00:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 00:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 00:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 00:08
July 29, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:38
- Re: "Friendly Premises", Dan Christensen, 23:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 23:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 23:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 23:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 22:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 22:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 21:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 21:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 21:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 21:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 21:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 20:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 20:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 19:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 19:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 19:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 18:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 18:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 18:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 18:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 18:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 18:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 17:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 17:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 17:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 17:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 16:58
- "Friendly Premises", geraldrm, 16:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 16:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 16:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 15:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 14:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 14:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 14:21
- Philosophy Discussion Board, Philo Discussion, 14:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 13:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 13:47
- Re: Cardinals for Tony, malbrain, 13:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 13:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 13:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 13:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 11:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Richard Henry, 10:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 10:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 09:03
- Re: "eventually" and "sometimes" in Temporal logic, George Dance, 08:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 08:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 08:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 07:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 06:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 05:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 05:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 05:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:08
- "eventually" and "sometimes" in Temporal logic, yuyang08, 05:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 04:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 04:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 04:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 04:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 04:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 04:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 04:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 04:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 04:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 03:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 03:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 03:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 03:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 03:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 03:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 02:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 02:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 02:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ron Sperber, 00:09
July 28, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 21:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 21:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 21:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 21:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 18:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 18:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 18:13
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 18:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 17:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 17:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 16:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 16:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 16:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 16:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 15:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 15:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 15:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 15:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 15:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 15:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 15:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 14:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 14:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han . deBruijn, 14:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 14:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 13:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:42
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 13:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 12:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 12:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 12:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 12:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 11:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 11:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 11:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 11:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 10:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:08
- Re: Cardinals for Tony, torkel, 10:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 10:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 09:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 09:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 09:19
- Re: Cardinals for Tony, William Elliot, 08:36
- Re: Weird problem, torkel, 08:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 07:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:06
- Weird problem, Bill Taylor, 07:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 06:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 03:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 03:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 03:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 01:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 01:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 01:12
- Re: Logic in Schools, torkel, 00:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 00:19
July 27, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 23:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 22:56
- Cardinals for Tony, Daryl McCullough, 22:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 22:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 22:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 22:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 22:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 21:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 21:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 20:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:39
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Snis Pilbor, 19:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 18:49
- Quantifiers for Tony Orlow, Daryl McCullough, 17:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 14:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 13:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 13:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 13:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 13:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 13:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 13:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 12:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 12:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 11:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 11:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 11:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 10:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 09:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 09:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Email me at CS not Boole, 08:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 08:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 07:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 07:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 07:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 07:18
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 07:15
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 07:03
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 06:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Herman Jurjus, 06:11
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 06:09
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, examachine, 06:08
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 05:53
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 05:52
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 05:28
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 05:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 05:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 03:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, albstorz, 03:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 03:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 01:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 00:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 00:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 00:00
July 26, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 23:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 23:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 23:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jim Burns, 23:39
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 23:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 23:22
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 23:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 22:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 22:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 21:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 20:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 19:14
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, H. Enderton, 19:02
- Re: Weird problem, H. Enderton, 18:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, James Burns, 18:53
- Re: primitive recursive, H. Enderton, 18:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 18:27
- Re: Logic in Schools, torkel, 18:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 17:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Email me at CS not Boole, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, markwh04, 17:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 17:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 16:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 16:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 16:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Lee Rudolph, 15:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 15:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 14:39
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 14:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 14:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 13:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 13:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 13:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 13:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 12:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 12:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Herman Jurjus, 12:43
- Re: a non-godelian system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:32
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Herman Jurjus, 12:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 10:30
- predicate logic encoding of Post's Correspondence Problem, yarden . katz, 09:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 08:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 08:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 08:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 08:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 08:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 07:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 07:46
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 07:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 07:44
- Re: a non-godelian system, Jym, 07:37
- Re: a non-godelian system, Patricia Shanahan, 07:01
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 06:48
- Re: Logic in Schools, torkel, 06:45
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 06:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 06:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 06:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 06:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 05:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 05:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 05:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 05:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 04:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 04:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 04:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 04:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 04:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 03:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 03:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 03:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 02:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 01:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 01:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 01:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 00:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 00:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 00:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 00:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:17
July 25, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:51
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Snis Pilbor, 23:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 23:46
- free adult website passwordsa at our message boards / forums, truplayaqwikpass, 23:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 23:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 22:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 22:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 21:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 21:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Poker Joker, 21:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 21:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 21:28
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Pierre Asselin, 20:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 19:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 18:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 17:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 17:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 17:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 17:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han . deBruijn, 17:03
- Re: a non-godelian system, Jym, 16:44
- Re: a non-godelian system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Alan Morgan, 16:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), georgie, 15:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 15:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 15:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 15:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 14:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:45
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Snis Pilbor, 13:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Alan Smaill, 12:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 12:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 12:31
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:12
- Re: Logic in Schools, torkel, 11:54
- Re: Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, george, 11:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 11:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:39
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Randy Poe, 10:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 10:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:09
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 10:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 09:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 09:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 09:19
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 08:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 08:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 08:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 08:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 08:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 07:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 07:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 06:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:38
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, George Dance, 06:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 06:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 05:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 04:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 04:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 04:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 03:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Gerry Myerson, 03:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Timothy Little, 03:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 03:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 02:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 02:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 02:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 02:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 01:06
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 00:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 00:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, MoeBlee, 00:41
- Re: a non-godelian system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:11
July 24, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:54
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 23:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Russell Easterly, 23:42
- Re: a non-godelian system, Proginoskes, 23:37
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 23:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 23:23
- Re: Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Pierre Asselin, 23:02
- Re: a non-godelian system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:58
- Re: a non-godelian system, |-|erc, 22:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 22:29
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 22:01
- Best ways to Godel number the recursives?, Snis Pilbor, 20:43
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 19:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:06
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:46
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Torkel Franzen, 17:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 16:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 16:08
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 15:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 15:05
- Re: Deduction problem in first order logic, torkel, 14:53
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 13:56
- Re: Deduction problem in first order logic, THE SWARM MASTER, 13:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:37
- Re: Honorary truth?, Owen, 10:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David C . Ullrich, 09:03
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 08:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:52
- Re: Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, David C . Ullrich, 08:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Kolker, 08:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 07:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, , 06:43
- Spread, and Flow, Forensics, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:20
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, |-|erc, 05:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 03:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 00:19
July 23, 2005
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Jim Spriggs, 22:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 22:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 22:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 21:41
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 21:39
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 21:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 21:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 21:09
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 21:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 20:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, cbrown, 20:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 19:54
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Timothy Little, 19:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 19:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 19:10
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, dtheobald, 19:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 18:43
- Re: Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, david petry, 18:35
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 18:26
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han . deBruijn, 18:01
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han . deBruijn, 17:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han . deBruijn, 17:50
- Re: primitive recursive, Barb Knox, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 16:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 15:59
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 13:30
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 11:00
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 09:17
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 01:39
July 22, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 23:44
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 22:51
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 21:58
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, Tron, 20:33
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:13
- Re: Deduction problem in first order logic, THE SWARM MASTER, 17:52
- Re: Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, Jim Spriggs, 17:45
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, George Dance, 15:53
- Re: Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:35
- Re: Weird problem, Jim Spriggs, 15:28
- Re: Weird problem, torkel, 15:02
- Re: Weird problem, Babylonian, 14:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Alan Morgan, 13:04
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jesse Alama, 12:47
- Re: Honorary truth?, Dunk, 12:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 11:46
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 11:37
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 11:00
- Anti-Cantorians and the Applicability of Logic, Daryl McCullough, 10:54
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, torkel, 10:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 10:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 10:34
- Re: Weird problem, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 10:28
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 10:26
- Re: Weird problem, Peter Webb, 10:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 09:56
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Robert Low, 09:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 09:46
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, gsax, 09:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 09:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David C . Ullrich, 09:10
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 09:08
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David C . Ullrich, 09:04
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, David C . Ullrich, 08:38
- Weird problem, n3wb1e, 08:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Martin Shobe, 08:10
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 06:50
- Re: Deduction problem in first order logic, torkel, 06:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 05:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 05:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 04:16
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 04:12
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 03:59
- primitive recursive, Bill Taylor, 02:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chan-Ho Suh, 02:18
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, Helene . Boucher, 01:30
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, gsax, 01:20
- Re: a simple question regarding irony, Helene . Boucher, 01:11
- a simple question regarding irony, gsax, 01:06
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 00:57
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 00:48
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 00:27
July 21, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 23:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 23:14
- Re: primitive recursive, Jesse Alama, 22:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 22:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 21:15
- Re: primitive recursive, Barb Knox, 20:53
- primitive recursive, n3wb1e, 20:26
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, quasi, 18:47
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 17:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 17:19
- Deduction problem in first order logic, THE SWARM MASTER, 17:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 15:21
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:18
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 15:17
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:15
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, malbrain, 15:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 14:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 14:47
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 14:38
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 14:35
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 14:27
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 14:11
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 13:36
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:34
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 13:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 13:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 12:55
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chris Menzel, 12:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 11:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 11:49
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 10:02
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 09:52
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 09:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, georgie, 08:53
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 08:27
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, David C . Ullrich, 08:10
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:59
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:52
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Han de Bruijn, 07:44
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dik T. Winter, 07:38
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 07:13
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 07:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 05:58
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Keith Ramsay, 03:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Chan-Ho Suh, 02:20
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, David Kastrup, 01:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Proginoskes, 01:35
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, MoeBlee, 01:32
- Re: Honorary truth?, MoeBlee, 01:01
- Re: Honorary truth?, MoeBlee, 00:57
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, imaginatorium, 00:08
July 20, 2005
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Dave Rusin, 22:21
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 20:34
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 20:26
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 20:18
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:09
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 19:40
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:31
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 19:29
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 19:05
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse Alama, 19:05
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:23
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:49
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 17:29
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:21
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, Dunk, 16:50
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, george, 16:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, stephen, 16:32
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 16:28
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Daryl McCullough, 16:14
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 16:07
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 16:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:04
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, torkel, 16:02
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, G . Frege, 16:01
- Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, david petry, 15:47
- Re: Honorary truth?, Dunk, 14:42
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 14:18
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Babylonian, 14:02
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, georgie, 13:56
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Chris Menzel, 12:51
- Re: Basis for Lambda Functions, Chris Menzel, 11:55
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 10:17
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, George Dance, 09:49
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 08:38
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 08:33
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, David C . Ullrich, 08:09
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, David C . Ullrich, 08:04
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, David C . Ullrich, 07:57
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 07:05
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Keith Ramsay, 05:22
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, torkel, 05:00
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:02
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:58
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, sradhakr, 03:28
- Re: Questions for Uncountability Deniers, William Elliot, 03:13
- Re: Basis for Lambda Functions, William Elliot, 03:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), sradhakr, 02:28
- Questions for Uncountability Deniers, MoeBlee, 02:14
- Basis for Lambda Functions, Bill Taylor, 01:18
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Babylonian, 00:42
July 19, 2005
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 22:46
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Keith Ramsay, 20:35
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 17:56
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, george, 14:45
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, george, 14:24
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, george, 13:55
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, george, 13:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), george, 13:39
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 11:36
- Re: Being and Nothing, Andrew, 09:22
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 09:09
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Owen, 07:53
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Achim Blumensath, 03:47
- Re: Being and Nothing, William Elliot, 03:14
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Robert Low, 03:05
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 01:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 01:21
July 18, 2005
- Re: Honorary truth?, MoeBlee, 23:24
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 22:58
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jesse Alama, 22:28
- Re: Honorary truth?, Dunk, 20:34
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 20:13
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, dtheobald, 19:22
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Chris Menzel, 19:14
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:36
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Robert Low, 18:32
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:28
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 18:26
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 18:11
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 18:03
- Re: Honorary truth?, MoeBlee, 17:39
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 16:52
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Chris Menzel, 13:25
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Owen, 13:16
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 13:02
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 12:56
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Chris Menzel, 12:48
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Robert Low, 12:42
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Babylonian, 11:21
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 10:13
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 09:33
- Re: Being and Nothing, Andrew, 09:27
- Honorary truth?, Dunk, 07:55
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 07:33
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Barb Knox, 05:49
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 03:00
- Re: Completeness, Jesse Alama, 01:08
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 01:03
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jesse Alama, 00:40
July 17, 2005
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 22:22
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:03
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 20:18
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 20:15
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Keith Ramsay, 18:31
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Chris Menzel, 18:07
- Re: Claims, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:20
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, examachine, 10:23
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, dtheobald, 10:15
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Jim Spriggs, 09:17
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, David C . Ullrich, 09:11
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, David C . Ullrich, 09:09
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 07:19
- Re: Completeness, torkel, 03:14
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 02:14
July 16, 2005
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 23:55
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 23:49
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 23:17
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 23:14
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, dtheobald, 22:35
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 22:26
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 22:17
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Keith Ramsay, 21:44
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 21:40
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Max Weiss, 21:08
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Jim Spriggs, 20:28
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 20:12
- Re: Claims, Uncle Al, 19:56
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 19:42
- Re: Logic in Schools, Jim Spriggs, 18:59
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Jim Spriggs, 18:53
- Re: Completeness, n3wb1e, 18:28
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), George Dance, 16:29
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Babylonian, 16:16
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Helene . Boucher, 16:10
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, David C . Ullrich, 15:42
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), David C . Ullrich, 15:37
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 15:10
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 14:51
- Re: Logic in Schools, PureAI, 14:48
- Re: Claims, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:46
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 14:28
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 14:25
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, George Dance, 14:24
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, George Dance, 14:19
- Re: Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Keith Ramsay, 14:07
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 13:42
- Re: Claims, Uncle Al, 13:30
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Jim Spriggs, 13:10
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Peter Webb, 13:07
- Who believes/believed that set theory is/was inconsistent?, Jim Spriggs, 12:57
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Jim Spriggs, 12:50
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 12:32
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, George Dance, 12:32
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:06
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, erite423, 11:13
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Peter Webb, 11:10
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Owen, 09:48
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 09:43
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Michael De, 09:40
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Jim Spriggs, 09:37
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Michael De, 09:35
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Peter Webb, 08:40
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 08:21
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), David C . Ullrich, 07:40
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, erite423, 07:24
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, William Elliot, 07:02
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 05:40
- Being and Nothing, William Elliot, 05:36
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 05:34
- Re: Claims, William Elliot, 05:24
- Re: Claims, john_ramsden, 05:19
- Re: Claims, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:54
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 04:49
- Re: Claims, William Elliot, 04:33
- Claims, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:09
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 03:28
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 02:49
- Re: which is more fundamental?, Acme Diagnostics, 02:21
- Re: which is more fundamental?, gsax, 01:24
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Martin Shobe, 00:56
July 15, 2005
- Re: Logic in Schools, Jim Spriggs, 21:53
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Chris Menzel, 21:37
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Douglas Theobald, 20:36
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, erite423, 19:43
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Douglas Theobald, 19:20
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, William Elliot, 19:13
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Jim Spriggs, 18:17
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Jim Spriggs, 18:04
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Jim Spriggs, 17:56
- Re: What isn't a tautology?, Douglas Theobald, 16:32
- What isn't a tautology?, Dunk, 15:27
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Babylonian, 12:17
- Logic in Schools, George Dance, 11:09
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 09:15
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 08:47
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Peter Webb, 08:40
- Re: which is more fundamental?, Peter Webb, 08:29
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, William Elliot, 07:52
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 06:28
July 14, 2005
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Michael De, 23:30
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), William Elliot, 22:13
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Reinhold Friedrich Burger, 21:57
- re: which is more fundamental?, Acme Diagnostics, 19:16
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Neil W Rickert, 19:08
- Re: Is it a paradox? (fwd), Tron, 18:51
- Re: which is more fundamental?, Jim Spriggs, 18:23
- Re: which is more fundamental?, William Elliot, 17:24
- Re: which is more fundamental?, Colin, 16:26
- Is it a paradox? (fwd), Reinhold Friedrich Burger, 16:21
- Re: Is this theorem really in S?, n3wb1e, 13:24
- Re: Is this theorem really in S?, torkel, 13:15
- Re: Is this theorem really in S?, H. Enderton, 13:12
- Re: Logic in Schools, torkel, 13:08
- Re: Is this theorem really in S?, Chris Menzel, 13:02
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:25
- Is this theorem really in S?, n3wb1e, 12:15
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 09:24
- Re: which is more fundamental?, William Elliot, 09:07
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, William Elliot, 09:03
- Re: which is more fundamental?, Babylonian, 08:53
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 07:24
- Penrose's impossible object in 4D, gsax, 06:55
- which is more fundamental?, gsax, 06:52
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Achim Blumensath, 06:29
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 06:18
- Re: Completeness, Thomas Käufl, 05:46
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, William Elliot, 03:17
July 13, 2005
- Re: Completeness, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:37
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 17:46
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Babylonian, 16:51
- Re: Logic in Schools, Keith Ramsay, 15:33
- Re: Completeness, Jim Spriggs, 14:33
- Re: Completeness, Jim Spriggs, 14:29
- Re: Completeness, Chris Menzel, 14:13
- Re: Completeness, H. Enderton, 14:06
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Babylonian, 10:08
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, THE SWARM MASTER, 09:27
- Re: Completeness, Peter Webb, 09:21
- Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?, Tom, 07:59
- Re: Completeness, David C . Ullrich, 06:52
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Achim Blumensath, 03:50
- Re: Completeness, Thomas Käufl, 03:48
- Re: Completeness, torkel, 02:11
- Re: Completeness, Michael De, 00:54
- Re: Completeness, Michael De, 00:48
July 12, 2005
- Re: Completeness, torkel, 23:01
- Re: Completeness, William Elliot, 21:38
- Completeness, n3wb1e, 21:02
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Max Weiss, 20:30
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Daryl McCullough, 16:49
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 16:22
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, H. Enderton, 15:37
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, THE SWARM MASTER, 13:17
- Re: Is there a name for this argument?, Del, 13:05
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, David C . Ullrich, 08:08
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, David C . Ullrich, 08:05
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, David C . Ullrich, 08:00
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 01:15
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, Michael De, 00:52
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, george, 00:16
July 11, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 23:30
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Jim Spriggs, 22:16
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Chris Menzel, 22:11
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, Michael De, 21:07
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, THE SWARM MASTER, 20:28
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, Michael De, 19:58
- Re: Is there a name for this argument?, DanielSan, 19:49
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, Michael De, 19:11
- Re: von Neumann universe, H. Enderton, 18:46
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, H. Enderton, 18:42
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, Michael De, 18:27
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Robert Low, 16:02
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:49
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:41
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Robert Low, 15:40
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:39
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:36
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 15:19
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 13:38
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Chris Menzel, 12:38
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, examachine, 12:16
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, examachine, 12:12
- Re: Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, torkel, 12:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 11:43
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 11:41
- Need a proof (or disproof) of this conjecture, THE SWARM MASTER, 11:03
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Alan Smaill, 10:57
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 10:55
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Gloyckle, 10:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:40
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 10:02
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 09:57
- Re: Prime model in DLO, Achim Blumensath, 09:55
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 09:26
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 08:59
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 08:55
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., torkel, 08:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 08:17
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 08:01
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Babylonian, 07:02
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 06:59
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 06:52
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 05:16
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Barb Knox, 04:58
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 04:30
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 04:02
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:49
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 01:09
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 01:06
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Chris Menzel, 00:24
- Re: Partially ordered quantifiers, Michael De, 00:01
July 10, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 23:37
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 23:27
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:04
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:33
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Publius, 22:30
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:24
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:08
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 22:07
- Re: Partially ordered quantifiers, Chris Menzel, 22:03
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Chris Menzel, 21:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 21:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 21:17
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 21:13
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Allan C Cybulskie, 20:31
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Allan C Cybulskie, 20:25
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Allan C Cybulskie, 20:22
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Pierre Asselin, 20:05
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 18:48
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 18:30
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 18:21
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 17:57
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 17:23
- Prime model in DLO, Jean-Pierre MERX, 16:02
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 15:35
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 15:32
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 15:09
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Chris Menzel, 15:05
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 15:02
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 14:57
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Chris Menzel, 14:38
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 14:01
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:32
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 13:30
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 13:21
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 13:15
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 12:38
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, george, 12:02
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Robert Low, 11:20
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Jim Spriggs, 10:27
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:18
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:13
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 09:59
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Michael De, 07:47
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Lee Rudolph, 05:40
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Chris Menzel, 05:32
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Bhupinder Singh Anand, 05:19
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Helene . Boucher, 02:30
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, RichD, 01:52
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Michael De, 01:02
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, galathaea, 00:14
July 09, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 23:46
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 22:30
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Michael De, 22:28
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:26
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:11
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 20:52
- Re: Question on logic and Godel, Chris Menzel, 19:59
- Question on logic and Godel, RichD, 19:12
- Re: PL or PLI, William Elliot, 18:35
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 17:02
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jesse Alama, 15:29
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 15:19
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 15:07
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 15:03
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, JonTi, 14:54
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 14:51
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 14:50
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 14:45
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 14:44
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 14:44
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 14:37
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 14:34
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Acme Diagnostics, 14:33
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 14:25
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 14:07
- Re: PL or PLI, G . Frege, 14:00
- Re: PL or PLI, George Dance, 13:50
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 13:47
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 13:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 13:12
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 13:02
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 12:58
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 12:54
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:48
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 12:04
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 12:00
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 11:58
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 11:53
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 11:44
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 11:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:37
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 10:29
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 10:27
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 10:10
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 09:55
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 09:53
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 09:41
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 09:38
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 09:28
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 09:22
- Re: PL or PLI, William Elliot, 09:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 08:47
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 08:42
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 08:37
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 07:20
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 07:14
- Re: PL or PLI, George Dance, 06:58
- Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 05:14
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 03:23
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 02:18
- Re: PL or PLI, William Elliot, 01:12
July 08, 2005
- Re: PL or PLI, Michael De, 22:55
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Paul Holbach, 22:29
- Re: PL or PLI, George Dance, 22:07
- Re: von Neumann universe, Paul Holbach, 22:04
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 22:01
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 21:40
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 21:38
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 21:33
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, HERC777, 21:04
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 20:19
- Re: von Neumann universe, Aatu Koskensilta, 20:11
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 20:04
- Re: PL or PLI, William Elliot, 20:00
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 19:38
- Re: Logic in Schools, Keith Ramsay, 19:04
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 18:54
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 17:32
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 16:50
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., george, 16:39
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 16:26
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 16:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 16:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 16:07
- Re: von Neumann universe, Chris Menzel, 16:00
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 15:50
- von Neumann universe, H. Enderton, 15:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 15:35
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 15:24
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 15:22
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 15:12
- Re: PL or PLI, George Dance, 14:50
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 14:29
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 14:28
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 14:02
- Re: logic relay chat, Jesse Alama, 13:37
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 12:43
- PL or PLI, 1st Semester Logic Student, 11:28
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Gloyckle, 10:42
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 10:37
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 10:24
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 10:10
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 10:06
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., George Dance, 09:45
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 08:33
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 08:05
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 06:18
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 05:34
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, george, 03:49
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 03:46
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 03:22
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 01:23
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 00:37
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 00:36
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 00:31
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 00:12
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 00:04
July 07, 2005
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Torkel Franzen, 23:47
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Keith Ramsay, 23:45
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 22:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, part, 22:50
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, part, 22:42
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Jim Spriggs, 22:36
- A Set Theory Example of Plato's Form, Douglas Eagleson, 22:36
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Jim Spriggs, 22:36
- Re: Confused about Intuitionistic provability, Jim Spriggs, 22:35
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 22:23
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:22
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 22:03
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 21:55
- Re: A Word, Douglas Eagleson, 21:51
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 21:35
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Barb Knox, 21:17
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 21:14
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 21:10
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, part, 21:09
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 20:15
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 20:02
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, HERC777, 19:10
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 19:00
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 18:51
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 18:18
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 18:14
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 18:07
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 17:47
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 17:01
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 15:16
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 15:02
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 14:07
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Chris Menzel, 12:07
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Owen, 10:29
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Gloyckle, 10:05
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 09:28
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 08:02
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 07:26
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 07:21
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 07:20
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 07:13
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 07:12
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 07:02
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., G . Frege, 06:56
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 06:53
- Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Jim Spriggs, 06:40
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 06:38
- Re: logic question, Michael, 05:51
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., Torkel Franzen, 04:32
- Re: Interpretations and assignments., William Elliot, 04:16
- Interpretations and assignments., Michael De, 03:43
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 03:12
- Re: logic question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:29
- Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:21
July 06, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:19
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 22:03
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 21:48
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 20:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 20:51
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Tom Breton, 19:40
- Re: logic question, Timothy Little, 19:34
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 18:27
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 18:26
- Re: OT: Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Europa, 18:15
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 16:01
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:31
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:27
- Re: logic question, Babylonian, 13:32
- Re: logic question, Babylonian, 13:10
- Re: logic question, odin, 13:05
- Re: logic question, odin, 13:03
- Re: logic question, odin, 13:02
- Re: logic question, odin, 13:01
- Re: logic question, odin, 13:00
- logic question, WARREN GREENWALD, 12:51
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 12:04
- Re: Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all--energy/matter, George Dance, 11:15
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 11:02
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 10:25
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 10:06
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 10:04
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 09:42
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 09:36
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 09:32
- Re: Can logic improve my sex-life ???, George Dance, 09:30
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 09:26
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 09:26
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 09:21
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 09:03
- OT: Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Peter Webb, 08:48
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 04:51
- Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Robert Low, 03:05
- Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent, Europa, 02:43
July 05, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 21:02
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Chris Menzel, 17:01
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:08
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, george, 15:26
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, george, 15:16
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 14:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 14:19
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 13:58
- theory of a model class, Andrea Leonardi, 12:25
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Babylonian, 09:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 08:06
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 07:22
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Lee Rudolph, 06:32
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Mitch Harris, 04:55
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Herman Jurjus, 03:08
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:35
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 00:32
July 04, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 23:41
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 23:25
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Keith Ramsay, 23:19
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 23:13
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:46
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:43
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:21
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:21
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Chris Menzel, 21:08
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 20:23
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:42
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 19:41
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 19:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 19:29
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, HERC777, 18:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 18:57
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Jim Spriggs, 18:51
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:40
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Chris Menzel, 17:38
- Re: Post-Axiomatic Mathematics Proclamation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:03
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:42
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 15:37
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 13:33
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Chris Menzel, 13:06
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 13:01
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:57
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 12:28
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, George Dance, 12:26
- Plato's Form in a Driveway Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 10:29
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 10:04
- Re: Post Axiom Syndrome, Babylonian, 04:12
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 02:09
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Stu, 02:01
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Stu, 01:33
- Post Axiom Syndrome, William Elliot, 00:40
July 03, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tron, 23:08
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 23:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 23:06
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tron, 22:59
- Re: Q about Smullyan, First Order Logic, Dan Piponi, 22:36
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:01
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 21:48
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 20:29
- Re: Q about Smullyan, First Order Logic, Michael De, 20:26
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 18:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 17:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 17:15
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 17:12
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, enki, 17:00
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 16:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 16:07
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 16:06
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 13:30
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:58
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:55
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:53
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:41
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:34
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:29
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:28
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 12:25
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 12:09
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 11:57
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 11:51
- Re: Q about Smullyan, First Order Logic, Dan Piponi, 11:46
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 11:33
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, HERC777, 11:29
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 11:22
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 11:20
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 11:14
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 10:48
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:34
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:25
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:22
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:21
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 10:18
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 10:14
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 07:26
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 07:10
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 07:01
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 06:49
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 06:15
- Re: Derivations (SD), Acme Diagnostics, 05:55
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 05:37
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 03:22
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 02:53
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Chris Menzel, 01:44
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 00:42
July 02, 2005
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Acme Diagnostics, 23:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 23:26
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 22:42
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 22:12
- Re: Logic in Schools, Paul Holbach, 21:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 21:46
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 21:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, Michael De, 21:04
- Re: Q about Smullyan, First Order Logic, Michael De, 21:02
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 20:58
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 20:56
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Michael De, 20:38
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Milan, 20:25
- Q about Smullyan, First Order Logic, Dan Piponi, 20:24
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 19:57
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 19:44
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Chris Menzel, 18:43
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 16:59
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 14:46
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 14:18
- Re: Derivations (SD), Acme Diagnostics, 14:06
- Re: Derivations (SD), Acme Diagnostics, 13:52
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Albert Wagner, 11:53
- Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia, timm, 11:29
- Re: Logic in Schools, Paul Holbach, 11:03
- Re: Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all--energy/matter, Niels van der Linden, 10:44
- Re: Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all--energy/matter, ReelMcKoi, 10:26
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Ron, 10:22
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 10:16
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 10:09
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 09:31
- Re: Derivations (SD), David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 08:10
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 06:55
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 06:49
- Re: Derivations (SD), Helene . Boucher, 06:36
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 05:37
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 05:37
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 05:33
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 05:29
- Re: Logic in Schools, Michael De, 05:28
- Re: errata, Max Weiss, 05:11
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 05:07
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 04:58
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 03:35
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 02:21
- Re: Logic in Schools, mikejde@xxxxxxxxx, 01:29
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 01:01
July 01, 2005
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, mikejde@xxxxxxxxx, 21:56
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, mikejde@xxxxxxxxx, 21:55
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, mikejde@xxxxxxxxx, 21:47
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 21:02
- Re: Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 20:51
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Nam Nguyen, 20:09
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 20:02
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 19:36
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 19:23
- Re: Logic in Schools, Paul Holbach, 18:36
- Re: Derivations (SD), Jim Spriggs, 18:01
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 17:55
- Re: Derivations (SD), Barb Knox, 17:53
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 17:40
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 17:05
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 16:53
- Re: Logic in Schools, G . Frege, 16:45
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 15:58
- Re: Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all, Katt, 15:51
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jim Spriggs, 15:49
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 15:45
- Re: Derivations (SD), Jim Spriggs, 15:34
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Jim Spriggs, 15:31
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Wordsmith, 15:11
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Nam Nguyen, 13:54
- Re: Logic in Schools, Paul Holbach, 13:15
- Re: Logic in Schools, Paul Holbach, 13:02
- Re: Modal logics with binders and fixpoints, Torkel Franzen, 12:55
- Modal logics with binders and fixpoints, Vincenzo Ciancia, 12:52
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 12:03
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 11:47
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Paul Holbach, 11:40
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 11:38
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 11:36
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 11:34
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 11:22
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Telecart, 10:48
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tim, 10:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 10:17
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 10:08
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 09:59
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, Chris Menzel, 09:20
- Re: Equivalent modal logics, David C . Ullrich, 08:06
- Re: Derivations (SD), David C . Ullrich, 07:59
- Derivations (SD), William Elliot, 06:01
- Re: Derivations (SD), Robert Low, 05:39
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 04:41
- Re: Derivations (SD), 1st Semester Logic Student, 04:10
- Re: A Word, jhn_hbr, 02:28
- Equivalent modal logics, mikejde@xxxxxxxxx, 01:25
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Sir Frederick, 00:49
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Publius, 00:46
June 30, 2005
- Re: Logic in Schools, Acme Diagnostics, 23:56
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Babylonian, 22:11
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, enki, 21:30
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, enki, 21:21
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tron, 20:21
- [FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger, 20:03
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Publius, 16:32
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Sir Frederick, 16:23
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tim, 16:19
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Tim, 16:03
- Re: What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Sir Frederick, 15:32
- Re: A Word, Douglas Eagleson, 15:14
- errata, george, 14:04
- Re: Logic in Schools, Torkel Franzen, 12:38
- Re: Logic in Schools, George Dance, 12:30
- Re: Considerations of Time-Travel in General Relativity., playbass, 12:22
- What Justifies a Philosphy of Mind?, Immortalist, 12:08
- Re: A Word, Albert Wagner, 10:50
- Re: A Word, Douglas Eagleson, 10:19
- Re: A Word, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: Derivations (SD), David C . Ullrich, 08:48
- Re: A Word, Albert Wagner, 08:39
- Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:22
- Re: An Approximate Circle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 04:49
- A Word, Douglas Eagleson, 00:01
- Re: An Approximate Circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
Privacy Policy