sci.lang
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Universal grammar

Subject: Re: Universal grammar
From: LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:59:47 +0800
Newsgroups: sci.lang
>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Aberg <haberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Hans> One has made an experiment, where a strong current was
    Hans> induced in a superconductor, moving circularly then. It was
    Hans> left for some years, and then the current was
    Hans> measured. There was no measurable difference. One would
    Hans> think the measurement itself somehow altered the current - I
    Hans> do not know. But as far as one knows, the resistance in
    Hans> superconductors is exactly 0, not a small positive number.
    >>  Paul was asking what happens when the current flowing through
    >> the superconducting loop *changes*.

    Hans> The electron pairs are accelerated, as they move in a loop.

    >> Doesn't     that    involve emission/absorption of photons --
    >> inevitably?

    Hans> As far as I know, static magnets and superconductors do not
    Hans> emit photons.

I'm talking about CHANGING currents.  Not static ones.


    Hans> The atoms have magnetic field, but only emit photons in
    Hans> the connection with an electron changing orbit.

So, you believe an iron  atom doesn't emit photons when you accelerate
the whole  atom without exciting it's electrons?   (Remember, the iron
atom  is  a small  magnet.   I'm  thus  talking about  accelerating  a
magnet!)


    >> If you're going to keep  a constant current on a
    >> superconducting loop, how are you going to make use of it to do
    >> computations?

    Hans> That is for guy inventing the switch to figure out. :-) No
    Hans> such switch exists - I just put in as an idea. 

And I've been refuting this idea.

Making changes  to EM  fields must involve  emission or  absorption of
photons.


    Hans> Some are claiming that this is wholly impossible. But that
    Hans> was said about superconducting before superconductors was
    Hans> discovered.

No.   This  has  nothing  to  do with  superconduction.   Even  in  an
absolutely  ZERO-resistance  circuit, you  would  dissipate energy  by
changing the current, because of the inevitable emission/absorption of
photons.  That is the case even though you have ZERO resistance.

Simple  calculations:   suppose  you  have  2   charged  capacitors  C
maintaining  different voltages  V1  and V2.   Now,  you connect  them
together, so that they can rebalance their charges to achieve the same
voltage  across  their  ends.    Suppose  also  that  the  circuit  is
superconducting, so  that no energy  is dissipated as  internal energy
during   the  charge-redistribution.    Now,   calculate  the   final,
equilibrium charges on the capacitors.   Then, use the formula E = 0.5
C V^2 to compute the total  energy stored in the capacitors before and
after  the charge  redistribution.  Do  you notice  some  energy loss?
Where to?


-- 
Lee Sau Dan                     李守敦                          ~{@nJX6X~}

E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>