| Subject: | Re: How does a baby learn language, when learning requires concentration |
|---|---|
| From: | Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:27:11 +0100 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.lang |
Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:54:14 -0500: penguinsare@xxxxxxxxx (Penguins Are): in sci.lang: >Concentration is required to memorize-focus. It's not. It's not needed to memorize. I don't know what you mean by memorize-focus. Doesn't focus mean the same as concentrate here? . >Then how does the baby >learn words and basic grammer by age three when they are too young to >focus narrowly? It uses the best method, which is using the language (passively, then increasingly actively) without conciously concentrating. That works better for adults too. Memorize-focus isn't an effectively method to learn things, including language. Repetition and connection with other intellectual tasks is better. Hence my http://rudhar.com/etymolog/rentesen.htm . >How do they get all the words when adults studying a foreign language >must go over and over vocabulary lists to remember anything? Babies do it right, adults doing it that wat do it wrong. >This seems to me a reasonable question. It's the wrong question, because it departs from an incorrect assumption. -- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com |
| Previous by Date: | Re: No diacritics in English, Ruud Harmsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Russian declension of last names ending in -enko, Paul J Kriha |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How does a baby learn language, when learning requires concentration, Herman Rubin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How does a baby learn language, when learning requires concentration, erilar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |