|
|
I believe that, if we turn the clock back to the times, before I gave
the opportunity to some few scholars to help my discovery forward, it
was in the last century, in 1986. Every-one filologist, if asked, would
have expressed the same consensus of opinion, that their, for sure,
great accademical knowledge vouched for that the structure of the
inscription of the Phaistos disc, was a typical example of a
grammatical event. Everyone who dared to claim otherwise, should be
taken for charlatans, and pigeonholed.
Today we are rounding year 2007, and it is all different. Thanks to my
discovery of the 22 dissimilar stems, and the examinations on the
conditions, that followed; the disc is complementary no-longer the
concern of filologists, but only of interest for statisticians,
physicians, mathematicians and the like.
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/f13c.htm
Bright new year!
Hagen
And may our future last long.
P.S. Still not helped forward.
|
|