Re: getting out of LaTeX

[Ruud Harmsen]

30 Aug 2006 15:49:42 -0700: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:

>> >> Because he says everything was OK.
>> >
>> >I repeat: How does the editor know the reviewer even looked at it?
>>
>> If the reviewer haphazardly changes some words to a synonym here and
>> there, how will the editor know he seriously looked at the rest of the
>> text and didn't miss the real problems?
>
>Do you have any idea at all what reviewers do? How would they
>"haphazardly change some words"? 

Of course they don't. Don't you understand irony? Please reread the
discussion and try to understand what I meant.

>If the editor knew there were "real
>problems," why did they bother sending it out for review at all?

Are you deliberately trying to misinterprete and misrepresent
everything I write?