|
|
In article <1156978081.671972.132910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Peter T.
Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
...
> The evidence that an article has been reviewed is comments on the
> article.
Yes. And the comments can be "good article, go ahead". It is *not*
necessary to suggest changes to show you did read it. And indeed,
not every referee suggests changes on every paper he receives.
Apparently you are not very familiar with the scholarly world.
--
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/
|
|