|
|
In article
<Pine.LNX.4.63.0608291413380.2325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Helmut Richter <hhr-m@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Besides their more special meanings, the words "stem" and "root" are both
> used to denote the core part of a word to which affixes are attached. Are
> the two words synonymous in this context?
>
> In the German language, there are many words that look as if they had an
> affix (mostly a suffix) but this affix appears in each cognate word, e.g.
> "Wagen" with the suffix "-en", but all not to distant cognates contain the
> n of the suffix, e.g. "Wagner". The "-(e)n" thus belongs to the word
> itself and is not an *additional* affix. Would one say that it is part of
> the root? Or that it is part of the word stem?
>
> Without being sure about the correct terminology, I would consider it part
> of the root but not part of the stem, but I want to check whether my
> terminology is correct in this point.
A root is the innermost morpheme of a word (no affixes) that carries
the primary lexical content of the word, while a stem is a root or
stem plus an affix (thus, each affix creates a new stem).
The inflectional stem is specifically the stem that consists of the
root plus all and only the derivational affixes in the word. Many
people use "stem" to refer only to the inflectional stem.
In your example, "Wag" would be the root (and perhaps a zero-derived
stem, if inflectional affixes can be added to it alone), while "Wagen"
is a stem.
Nathan
--
Nathan Sanders
Linguistics Program
Williams College
http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from www.teranews.com">http://www.teranews.com
|
|