|
|
hagen wrote:
> grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > hagen wrote:
> > > grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > hagen wrote:
> > > > > Supervised by the good editor Ernst Grumach (not to be confused with
> > > > > another authority: Groucho Marx), who must by then have wanted very
> > > > > much to experience the disclosure of the secret behind the inscription
> > > > > I talk about; The magazine 'Kadmos' invited scholars
> > > > > internationally, to write brief articles about their knowledge upon
> > > > > this special topic. Perhaps their mutual efforts could be pieced
> > > > > together and uncover a kind of common denominator, an initial key to
> > > > > this exciting enigma. It was in the midst of the last century, that
> > > > > long ago!
> > > > > What they could not achieve, I succeded completely! Twenty-two
> > > > > stem-forms giving the denominator eleven (five point five). A system
> > > > > of abbreviations, as firm as a rock leading to, that this old message
> > > > > conseals the calendar. What afterwards went wrong, one can only guess,
> > > > > but a perfect possibility to salute the entrance of the third
> > > > > millenium
> > > > > was bypassed, that is for sure, if not caused by superstitious shadows
> > > > > of the past 'kind of persons', then perhaps by mediocrity enviers.
> > > > > As you know, those are not necesarily seperated from degrees of
> > > > > position. God knows.
> > > > > Hagen
> > > > > Here it is. It conquers it all:
> > > > > http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
> > > > > Forever teasing you:
> > > > > web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/gorella.gif">http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/gorella.gif
> > > >
> > > > What is nice with you, Ole, is your way to make fallacious reasonings
> > > > which do not prove anything, or to put aside any non-calendaric
> > > > argument !
> > > >
> > > > Example 1)- : you wrote : "Prosody, Metre ? NO !" One would have hoped
> > > > for a more substantial "demonstration" of such a categorical
> > > > statement... Well, there is none.
> > > > Example 2)-: You triumphantly wrote : E.F.A.N.K. ("Evidence for a
> > > > non-linguistic key) : "The various translations don't even follow a
> > > > common agreement upon the length of the sentences in a presumed text".
> > > > So what ?... Anybody knows that ALL the translations of the Phaistos
> > > > Disk but ONE, the Proto-Ionic Solution, are false. I asked you several
> > > > times to look at THIS solution and to read the J.Faucounau's books
> > > > (alas in French) "Les proto-Ioniens" and "Le déchiffrement du Disque
> > > > de Phaistos", and, only after that, to show -if you can do it !- that
> > > > something would be wrong with this solution. But you prefer playing
> > > > with the various number of FALSE solutions which have been proposed...
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > grapheus
> > >
> > > www.theoi.com/Gallery/T33.2.html">http://www.theoi.com/Gallery/T33.2.html
> > > www.dalank.de/notabene/pic1.html">http://www.dalank.de/notabene/pic1.html
> >
> > What has this to do with the Phaistos Disk ?
> >
> > grapheus
>
> Sorry, it was only an ingredient of humour, that I feel victorious in
> this case.
> Showing Pasiphae nursing her child, and Minotauros the strategist
> enveloping its prey :-)
>
> According to your message above, it reminds me of this strategy:
> If I choose B as my expression, then only A would have been acceptable.
> Had I chosen A from the start, B or C were to prefer.
> Hagen
You are wrong. You believe that saying that your theory is false is
motivated by a personal hostility against you, but this is untrue. On
the contrary, I sympathize with your effort, stemms' discovery and
tenacity. But I just believe that you have taken the wrong way : the
Disk is NOT Minoan, and it is NOT a calendar, that's all. And its
solution has been found since years, when the "Proto-Ionic Solution"
was published.
Regards
grapheus
|
|