|
|
grapheus@xxxxxxx wrote:
> hagen wrote:
> > Supervised by the good editor Ernst Grumach (not to be confused with
> > another authority: Groucho Marx), who must by then have wanted very
> > much to experience the disclosure of the secret behind the inscription
> > I talk about; The magazine 'Kadmos' invited scholars
> > internationally, to write brief articles about their knowledge upon
> > this special topic. Perhaps their mutual efforts could be pieced
> > together and uncover a kind of common denominator, an initial key to
> > this exciting enigma. It was in the midst of the last century, that
> > long ago!
> > What they could not achieve, I succeded completely! Twenty-two
> > stem-forms giving the denominator eleven (five point five). A system
> > of abbreviations, as firm as a rock leading to, that this old message
> > conseals the calendar. What afterwards went wrong, one can only guess,
> > but a perfect possibility to salute the entrance of the third millenium
> > was bypassed, that is for sure, if not caused by superstitious shadows
> > of the past 'kind of persons', then perhaps by mediocrity enviers.
> > As you know, those are not necesarily seperated from degrees of
> > position. God knows.
> > Hagen
> > Here it is. It conquers it all:
> > http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
> > Forever teasing you:
> > web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/gorella.gif">http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/gorella.gif
>
> What is nice with you, Ole, is your way to make fallacious reasonings
> which do not prove anything, or to put aside any non-calendaric
> argument !
>
> Example 1)- : you wrote : "Prosody, Metre ? NO !" One would have hoped
> for a more substantial "demonstration" of such a categorical
> statement... Well, there is none.
> Example 2)-: You triumphantly wrote : E.F.A.N.K. ("Evidence for a
> non-linguistic key) : "The various translations don't even follow a
> common agreement upon the length of the sentences in a presumed text".
> So what ?... Anybody knows that ALL the translations of the Phaistos
> Disk but ONE, the Proto-Ionic Solution, are false. I asked you several
> times to look at THIS solution and to read the J.Faucounau's books
> (alas in French) "Les proto-Ioniens" and "Le déchiffrement du Disque
> de Phaistos", and, only after that, to show -if you can do it !- that
> something would be wrong with this solution. But you prefer playing
> with the various number of FALSE solutions which have been proposed...
>
> Regards
> grapheus
www.theoi.com/Gallery/T33.2.html">http://www.theoi.com/Gallery/T33.2.html
www.dalank.de/notabene/pic1.html">http://www.dalank.de/notabene/pic1.html
|
|