sci.geo.geology (thread)
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7,
don findlay,
2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Radix2, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Shane, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, SBC Yahoo, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Inez, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Lee Russell, 2006/06/30
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6,
don findlay,
2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Desertphile, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, bodrules, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, will1, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Gerry Murphy, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, JRP, 2006/06/30
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5,
don findlay,
2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, donstockbauer, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, allanm, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, hbarwood, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Harshman, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Desertphile, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Popelish, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Stuart, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Mark VandeWettering, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jim Willemin, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Marc, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Lee Jay, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Stanley Friesen, 2006/06/28
Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc.,
mmurphy72,
2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Jo Schaper, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., don findlay, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., michael . palmer1, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., rjtrembgeologist, 2006/06/26
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., mmurphy72, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 2006/06/25
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., rjtrembgeologist, 2006/06/29
- Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Jack Strickland, 2006/06/26
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4,
don findlay,
2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Timberwoof, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, mike3, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, michael . palmer1, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, tadchem, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Desertphile, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, eroot, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, gpatton, 2006/06/26
Rock found at Llantwit Major,
Wazflam the imperrigable,
2006/06/24
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, George, 2006/06/24
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 2006/06/24
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 2006/06/25
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 2006/06/25
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 2006/06/25
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/26
- Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/29
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3,
don findlay,
2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, TCE, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, bodrules, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Lee Oswald Ving, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Marc, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, bodrules, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/27
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 2006/06/28
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Lee Oswald Ving, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/25
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, brent23, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, will1, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, John Popelish, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, coaster, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Ernest Major, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, will1, 2006/06/24
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Thurisaz the Einherjer, 2006/06/25
Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.),
don findlay,
2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Marc, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Gerry Murphy, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), John Harshman, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Inez, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Mark VandeWettering, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Jo Schaper, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 2006/06/23
Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.),
don findlay,
2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Harshman, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), CreateThis, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Klaus, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Desertphile, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robert Carnegie, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Marc, 2006/06/18
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), bob young, 2006/06/19
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rick++, 2006/06/19
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), will1, 2006/06/19
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 2006/06/19
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), bhawes, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Inez, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Inez, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/21
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/22
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 2006/06/23
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Ye Old One, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Ye Old One, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/30
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/29
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 2006/06/30
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 2006/06/28
- Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 2006/06/23
Coming soon to a newgroup near you.,
don findlay,
2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Desertphile, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Desertphile, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Wakboth, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bobby D. Bryant, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., NRen2k5, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Mark VandeWettering, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Peter Barber, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robert Weldon, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bob Casanova, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Shane, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Inez, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., AC, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 2006/06/17
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Kermit, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Shane, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Inez, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/20
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Richard Forrest, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/21
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/22
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bill Hudson, 2006/06/20
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/20
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bill Hudson, 2006/06/20
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/20
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Klaus, 2006/06/22
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/18
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Ben Standeven, 2006/06/19
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Von R. Smith, 2006/06/22
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/22
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/26
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/26
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/26
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/27
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 2006/06/26
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., traklman, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 2006/06/23
- Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., stew dean, 2006/06/23
falsies - your turn,
don findlay,
2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Richard Forrest, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, John Harshman, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Desertphile, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Bill Hudson, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, dysfunction, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Rotwang, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Oxidized, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, jrsp8s, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Oxidized, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Cyde Weys, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, jrsp8s, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, Alan Morgan, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Shane, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Robert Carnegie, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, George, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Grandbank, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Klaus, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, Mark VandeWettering, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsies - your turn, traklman, 2006/06/15
Plonk,
Jim Lillie,
2006/06/10
Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please,
don findlay,
2006/06/10
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Marc, 2006/06/10
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, bullpup, 2006/06/10
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Klaus, 2006/06/10
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Desertphile, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ernest Major, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Stuart, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Shane, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, tadchem, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Harshman, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, will1, 2006/06/11
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ari Allyn-Feuer, 2006/06/12
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ben Standeven, 2006/06/12
- An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Art Deco, 2006/06/12
- Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ye Old One, 2006/06/18
falsification - trying again - no slide rules please.,
don findlay,
2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Richard Forrest, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Richard Forrest, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Zachriel, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Sam Wormley, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Sam Wormley, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Faux_Pseudo, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/18
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., CreateThis, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Peter Barber, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., George, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Odysseus, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/14
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rolf, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Don Cates, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., jimp, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/21
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Popelish, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., TomS, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., oriel36, 2006/06/18
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/18
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Wilkins, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., oriel36, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/21
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/11
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 2006/06/10
- falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ringer, 2006/06/10
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Bode, 2006/06/12
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., mcv, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., TomS, 2006/06/13
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Bode, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/15
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., john_bode, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/16
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Wilkins, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/20
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/21
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/17
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/18
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Popelish, 2006/06/19
- Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 2006/06/16
Great Unconformity,
Sandune,
2006/06/08
- Re: Great Unconformity, George, 2006/06/08
- Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 2006/06/08
- Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/08
- Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/09
- Re: Great Unconformity, George, 2006/06/09
- Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 2006/06/09
- Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/10
- Re: Great Unconformity, George, 2006/06/10
- Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/11
- Re: Great Unconformity, George, 2006/06/11
- Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 2006/06/12
- Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 2006/06/12
- Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 2006/06/12
- Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 2006/06/13
- Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 2006/06/14
- Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 2006/06/15
Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I...,
Jo Schaper,
2006/06/06
- Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., George, 2006/06/06
- Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/07
- Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., SBC Yahoo, 2006/06/07
John Harshman invites comment,
don findlay,
2006/06/06
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, Desertphile, 2006/06/06
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, VoiceOfReason, 2006/06/06
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, Inez, 2006/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, coaster, 2006/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/07
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/07
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, dkomo, 2006/06/07
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/08
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/08
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/08
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Wilkins, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, Robert Weldon, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, Richard Forrest, 2006/06/09
- Re: John Harshman invites comment, eyelessgame, 2006/06/07
Nominative determinism,
Aidan Karley,
2006/06/05
- Re: Nominative determinism, George, 2006/06/05
- Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/05
- Re: Nominative determinism, George, 2006/06/05
- Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, George, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, George, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, George, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 2006/06/08
- Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 2006/06/08
- Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 2006/06/08
- Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 2006/06/07
- Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/05
Reading Recommendations,
mozart,
2006/06/04
- Re: Reading Recommendations, coastwatch, 2006/06/04
- Re: Reading Recommendations, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/04
- Re: Reading Recommendations, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/05
- Re: Reading Recommendations, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/05
- Re: Reading Recommendations, Question Quigley, 2006/06/10
Geological falsification - the summary position,
don findlay,
2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Popelish, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jpopelish, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 2006/06/07
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/07
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jpopelish, 2006/06/07
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/08
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 2006/06/08
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Popelish, 2006/06/09
- Message not available
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jonathan, 2006/06/05
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Shane, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, bullpup, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 2006/06/05
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/05
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/05
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/05
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Ferrous Patella, 2006/06/06
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Mark Isaak, 2006/06/04
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/05
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Earle Jones, 2006/06/05
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/06
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 2006/06/06
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/06
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 2006/06/06
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 2006/06/07
- Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Shane, 2006/06/07
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Kleuskes & Moos, 2006/06/07
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., wade, 2006/06/07
- An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., Kleuskes & Moos, 2006/06/08
- Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., wade, 2006/06/08
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 2006/06/07
- The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Shane, 2006/06/07
- Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., bullpup, 2006/06/07
- Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Shane, 2006/06/08
- Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Particle_Energy = Temperature., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Particle_Energy = Temperature., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Temperature is relativistic., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/10
- Re: Temperature is relativistic., T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Shane, 2006/06/07
- Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, CrankHater, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Shane, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John C. Polasek, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John C. Polasek, 2006/06/08
- Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Gerry Murphy, 2006/06/09
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Eric Gisse, 2006/06/09
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Gerry Murphy, 2006/06/10
- -ct ^ .5, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: -ct ^ .5, Eric Gisse, 2006/06/09
- Re: -ct ^ .5, T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/06/10
- Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/10
- No information, no causality, exceeds the speed of light., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/10
- Re: No information, no causality, exceeds the speed of light., T Wake, 2006/06/11
- The observed lambda is a from of inflation, just slower and ever-constant., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: The observed lambda is a from of inflation, just slower and ever-constant., T Wake, 2006/06/12
- WMAP's error bars., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: WMAP's error bars., T Wake, 2006/06/12
- The start of the big bang..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: The start of the big bang..., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/09
- The entropy intrinsic to mass-energy over cosmic-time., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: The entropy intrinsic to mass-energy over cosmic-time., T Wake, 2006/06/10
- 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/11
- Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., T Wake, 2006/06/11
- The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/12
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/12
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., T Wake, 2006/06/12
- Pre-CMB gravity was powerful, leaving _Patterns_ in the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/15
- Re: Pre-CMB gravity was powerful, leaving _Patterns_ in the CMB., T Wake, 2006/06/15
- The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., T Wake, 2006/06/14
- w = -1 vs. Cosmic_Inflation., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/15
- Re: w = -1 vs. Cosmic_Inflation., T Wake, 2006/06/15
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Timberwoof, 2006/06/12
- An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over ¿ trillions of years prior to the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over ¿ trillions of years prior to the CMB., Timberwoof, 2006/06/13
- Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/15
- Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., T Wake, 2006/06/15
- Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/16
- Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., T Wake, 2006/06/16
- The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, T Wake, 2006/06/18
- Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/18
- An ever-constant lambda/w is the best model/simplest of inflation., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: An ever-constant lambda/w is the best model/simplest of inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/18
- Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/18
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- NOMINATION FOR LOONEY MAROON AWARD: Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- An ever-constant lambda/w is the best/simplest model of inflation., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/18
- The _Width_ of the early _Visible_ univserse has nothing to do with it's age., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/20
- Re: The _Width_ of the early _Visible_ univserse has nothing to do with it's age., T Wake, 2006/06/20
- Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Gregory A Greenman, 2006/06/18
- You can see the _True_ thread here..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Tom McDonald, 2006/06/18
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Timberwoof, 2006/06/18
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/18
- Just locate and engage in more constructive activites., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/19
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Gregory A Greenman, 2006/06/19
- Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/19
- Re: Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Ye Old One, 2006/06/19
- Re: Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Gregory A Greenman, 2006/06/19
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Ye Old One, 2006/06/19
- Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/19
- Re: A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- The smart ones seldom insult., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/21
- Re: The smart ones seldom insult., David Iain Greig, 2006/06/21
- Re: The smart ones seldom insult., T Wake, 2006/06/21
- Re: The smart ones seldom insult., Gregory A Greenman, 2006/06/21
- Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Re: An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over ¿ trillions of years prior to the CMB., T Wake, 2006/06/14
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/13
- Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Art Deco, 2006/06/13
- Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Ye Old One, 2006/06/11
- Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/11
- Re: Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Ye Old One, 2006/06/14
- Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/15
- Re: Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., T Wake, 2006/06/15
- Positrons are not perfectly modeled., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/16
- Re: Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., Tracy P. Hamilton, 2006/06/15
- The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/13
- Re: The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., gresham, 2006/06/13
- Re: The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., T Wake, 2006/06/14
- Re: The start of the big bang..., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Re: The start of the big bang..., CrankHater, 2006/06/16
- It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/16
- It's been at least 78 billion light-years since the Planck length transition., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/16
- Re: It's been at least 78 billion light-years since the Planck length transition., Ye Old One, 2006/06/18
- 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/19
- Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., T Wake, 2006/06/19
- Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Ye Old One, 2006/06/19
- Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., josephus, 2006/06/20
- Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Ye Old One, 2006/06/21
- Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., UC, 2006/06/16
- Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., TomS, 2006/06/16
- Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., T Wake, 2006/06/16
- Internet_Thieves !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: Internet_Thieves !, T Wake, 2006/06/18
- Re: Internet_Thieves !, Eric Gisse, 2006/06/18
- I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- I Googled: directional site:NetStumbler.COM, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/18
- Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Eric Gisse, 2006/06/19
- Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/19
- Re: Internet_Thieves !, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/18
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John Bode, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Shane, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, SeppoP, 2006/06/08
- Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, David Iain Greig, 2006/06/08
- Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- The ever-constant lambda in the ever-flat spacetime., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: The ever-constant lambda in the ever-flat spacetime., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Shane, 2006/06/09
- Where all the mass-energy once was, 13.7 billion light-years away., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Where all the mass-energy once was, 13.7 billion light-years away., T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/11
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., T Wake, 2006/06/11
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 2006/06/11
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., T Wake, 2006/06/11
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/11
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
- Gravity works on the total mass-energy, not just the visually observable mass., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/12
- Re: Gravity works on the total mass-energy, not just the visually observable mass., T Wake, 2006/06/12
- You can't see beyond the cosmic horizon., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/13
- Re: You can't see beyond the cosmic horizon., T Wake, 2006/06/14
- Mass outside our cosmic horizon effects the cosmic horizon., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/15
- Re: Mass outside our cosmic horizon effects the cosmic horizon., T Wake, 2006/06/15
- Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 2006/06/11
- The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/14
- Re: The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., T Wake, 2006/06/14
- Re: The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., Gerry Murphy, 2006/06/16
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/10
- Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/11
- Re: Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Timberwoof, 2006/06/11
- 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/11
- Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., T Wake, 2006/06/11
- Re: Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Robert J. Kolker, 2006/06/11
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 2006/06/07
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Jim Lillie, 2006/06/06
- Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/05
- Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/06
- You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/06
- Re: You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., T Wake, 2006/06/06
- Re: You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., Matt Silberstein, 2006/06/06
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Most have no postulates... nothing to give., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/07
- Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 2006/06/07
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/07
- Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/07
- Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes, WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_orange, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes, WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_orange, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/07
- WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/08
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, chrisv, 2006/06/08
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/06/07
- What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, T Wake, 2006/06/08
- I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., CrankHater, 2006/06/08
- Re: I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Eric Gisse, 2006/06/09
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/09
- Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/09
- WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, Marc, 2006/06/09
- Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/10
- Re: I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., T Wake, 2006/06/10
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/08
- Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/09
- Re: Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Most have no postulates... nothing to give., George, 2006/06/07
- Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/06
- Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., CrankHater, 2006/06/07
- My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., T Wake, 2006/06/07
- Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., CrankHater, 2006/06/08
- Crank_Hater, which " Wiki articles on relativity " did you write ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/08
- Re: Crank_Hater, which " Wiki articles on relativity " did you write ?, Eric Gisse, 2006/06/08
- Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 2006/06/09
- Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/07
- Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/07
- Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 2006/06/08
- Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Tracy P. Hamilton, 2006/06/09
- Samichlaus only takes 10 months to ferment, not 13.7 billion years., Jeff…Relf, 2006/06/09
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/06/07
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Joe Jakarta, 2006/06/13
- Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Richard Smol, 2006/06/21
A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know...,
Jo Schaper,
2006/06/01
- Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., George, 2006/06/02
- Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Jim Lillie, 2006/06/02
- Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., SBC Yahoo, 2006/06/02
- Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., will1, 2006/06/03
subduction rate,
Eigenvector,
2006/06/01
- Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: subduction rate, pete, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, Eigenvector, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, Jo Schaper, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 2006/06/02
- Re: subduction rate, George, 2006/06/03
- Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/03
- Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: subduction rate, rick++, 2006/06/05
- Re: subduction rate, will1, 2006/06/04
Re: So how would you falsify it?,
jonathan,
2006/05/27
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Kermit, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Augray, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Augray, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Per1000IPDay2, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Mark Isaak, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Richard Forrest, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Shane, 2006/06/07
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/07
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/08
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 2006/06/07
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/04
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/03
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/05/30
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/02
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 2006/06/07
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/08
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/08
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/08
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/09
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/09
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/09
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/09
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/10
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/04
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 2006/06/03
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/04
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/06
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 2006/06/05
- Message not available
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 2006/06/05
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 2006/06/06
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 2006/05/31
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 2006/06/01
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Rising-Star8471, 2006/06/15
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Rising-Star8471, 2006/06/15
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Charles Cagle, 2006/06/16
- Re: So how would you falsify it?, Timberwoof, 2006/06/19
Privacy Policy