sci.geo.geology (date)

sci.geo.geology (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

June 30, 2006

Re: Simulation of meteorite impact, George, 13:41
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, George, 13:08
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 12:29
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 12:19
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 12:14
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 12:10
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 12:06
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Bill Hudson, 11:32
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Bill Hudson, 11:16
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Jonathan Silverlight, 10:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 08:10
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 08:03
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 08:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Lee Russell, 07:30
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 07:27
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, allangmiller, 07:26
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 07:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Aidan Karley, 03:31
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Aidan Karley, 03:31
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Aidan Karley, 03:31
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, Aidan Karley, 03:31
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, George, 03:15
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Radix2, 02:47
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, JRP, 02:40
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 02:40
Re: Solution Cups: weathering process, Aidan Karley, 02:30
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Aidan Karley, 02:30
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Marc, 02:16
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 02:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 01:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Timberwoof, 01:53
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 01:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 00:44

June 29, 2006

Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Timberwoof, 23:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Timberwoof, 23:39
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 23:25
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 22:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, George, 22:25
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 22:09
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 22:06
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 21:56
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 21:54
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 21:53
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 21:52
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 21:12
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Wazflam the imperrigable, 19:57
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Ye Old One, 19:10
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 18:58
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Inez, 18:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 18:42
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 18:41
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 18:26
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 17:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:26
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jim Willemin, 16:58
Re: curvature of old rocks, David Iain Greig, 16:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jim Lillie, 16:39
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., rjtrembgeologist, 16:09
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, George, 15:52
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Kermit, 15:49
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Matt Silberstein, 15:45
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 15:24
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, David Iain Greig, 14:56
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, Aidan Karley, 14:40
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:27
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, George, 14:11
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 13:43
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Inez, 12:52
Re: curvature of old rocks, Ken Shackleton, 11:53
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 11:41
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Timberwoof, 11:39
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 11:36
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Kermit, 11:36
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 11:35
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 11:28
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Timberwoof, 11:25
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, SBC Yahoo, 11:22
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Shane, 10:01
Re: About the geology of the valley of Loire(France), J.F. Cornwall, 09:35
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Marc, 09:32
About the geology of the valley of Loire(France), keyukato, 09:17
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, The Enigmatic One, 07:24
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, rja . carnegie, 07:00
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Aidan Karley, 06:48
Re: Simulation of meteorite impact, Aidan Karley, 06:48
Re: Spelunker's 41-Year-Old Remains to Surface, Aidan Karley, 06:48
Re: curvature of old rocks, don, 05:22
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, Radix2, 05:00
Re: curvature of old rocks, Mo, 04:44
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 04:36
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 04:04
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7, don findlay, 03:47
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science., Ye Old One, 03:19
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 01:53
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 01:36
Re: curvature of old rocks, J. Taylor, 01:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 01:31
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 01:19
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 01:18
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 01:13
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 01:10
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 01:09
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 01:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 01:05
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 00:48
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 00:40
Re: curvature of old rocks, Ken Shackleton, 00:06

June 28, 2006

Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, catshark, 23:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Gerry Murphy, 22:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 22:25
Re: curvature of old rocks, don findlay, 22:18
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Tom McDonald, 22:08
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 22:00
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, George, 21:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:52
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:43
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:42
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:41
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:40
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 21:37
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Jo Schaper, 20:57
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, John Krempasky, 20:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Desertphile, 20:17
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 19:52
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 19:34
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 19:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Gerry Murphy, 18:17
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jim Willemin, 18:15
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Timberwoof, 18:04
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 18:02
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Stile4aly, 17:44
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., rjtrembgeologist, 17:26
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 16:57
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Kermit, 16:56
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, will1, 16:56
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 16:47
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 16:44
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, hlg, 16:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 16:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 16:20
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 16:17
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, bodrules, 15:41
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Lee Jay, 15:31
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 15:17
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 15:14
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 15:05
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, Desertphile, 15:05
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, SafeStorm, 14:35
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Robin Wier, 14:03
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Kermit, 13:45
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:29
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 13:27
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 13:24
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 13:20
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 13:10
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6, don findlay, 12:47
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Lee Jay, 12:42
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 12:41
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 12:30
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 12:22
Re: Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, ishky, 11:13
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, David Iain Greig, 10:53
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ken Shackleton, 10:31
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Robert Grumbine, 10:10
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Stanley Friesen, 09:57
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 09:27
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 09:18
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 09:15
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Marc, 09:08
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Alan Kellogg, 08:04
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, allangmiller, 07:45
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jim Willemin, 07:37
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 04:31
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 04:27
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 04:22
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 04:21
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 03:05
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Timberwoof, 02:59
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 02:36

June 27, 2006

Re: Advce needed on short course in Geostatistics, will1, 23:09
Re: Advce needed on short course in Geostatistics, rjtrembgeologist, 22:44
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, catshark101, 22:21
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, allisonki, 21:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, catshark101, 21:38
Advce needed on short course in Geostatistics, AA, 21:31
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 21:13
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Robin Levett, 21:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 20:57
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 20:53
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 20:47
Re: Chez Watt nomination: (Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5), Timberwoof, 20:36
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 20:34
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 20:33
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Timberwoof, 20:31
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 19:25
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 19:10
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 18:56
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 18:48
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 18:40
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Shane, 18:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 18:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 18:37
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 18:21
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 18:18
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 18:08
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 18:04
Volcanic Activity Reduction on Mt. Elbrus, SafeStorm, 17:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 17:56
Re: Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, J. Taylor, 17:21
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 17:11
Plate Tectonics:- Proven science, Ye Old One, 17:06
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, J. Taylor, 17:03
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Mark VandeWettering, 17:02
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 16:59
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 16:31
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 16:22
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, coaster, 15:58
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 15:39
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Wazflam the imperrigable, 15:20
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Wazflam the imperrigable, 15:18
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 14:59
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 14:55
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ken Shackleton, 14:32
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, J. Taylor, 14:15
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:53
Re: Solution Cups: weathering process, Carsten Troelsgaard, 13:50
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Jonathan Silverlight, 13:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 13:42
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 13:35
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Klaus, 13:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:32
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 13:25
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Pip R. Lagenta, 13:23
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Stuart, 13:18
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, Timberwoof, 12:57
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 12:54
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Popelish, 12:41
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 11:55
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, SBC Yahoo, 11:54
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, David Iain Greig, 11:53
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, George, 11:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, George, 11:44
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 11:44
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 11:25
Chez Watt nomination: (Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5), Desertphile, 11:09
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, Desertphile, 11:06
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, don findlay, 10:58
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Harshman, 10:29
Re: New Book: HIMALAYA (Geological Aspects) Volume-4, don findlay, 10:26
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, hbarwood, 09:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Wilkins, 08:47
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 08:20
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 08:18
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, allanm, 08:12
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, bodrules, 07:26
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, John Wilkins, 07:19
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, donstockbauer, 06:58
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 06:49
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 5, don findlay, 06:38
New Book: HIMALAYA (Geological Aspects) Volume-4, buddha1c, 03:16
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 02:51
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 01:41
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, Timberwoof, 01:06
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 01:00
Solution Cups: weathering process, stones'n'bones, 00:52

June 26, 2006

Re: curvature of old rocks, Mo, 23:46
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., rjtrembgeologist, 23:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 22:15
Re: curvature of old rocks, J. Taylor, 21:46
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, Jo Schaper, 21:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 21:31
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 21:20
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, John Wilkins, 20:58
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 20:49
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 20:47
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 20:41
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 20:36
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, Timberwoof, 20:33
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 20:25
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 20:24
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, J. Taylor, 20:22
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 20:19
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 20:17
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 20:09
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 19:56
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 19:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- The Proven Science, Ye Old One, 18:51
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 17:58
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 16:38
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Jo Schaper, 16:22
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Jack Strickland, 16:11
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 15:21
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 14:56
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 14:34
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 14:32
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:23
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, gpatton, 12:35
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 12:29
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, eroot, 12:18
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Robert Weldon, 10:54
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande, John Popelish, 09:33
XRD phase identification, Dirk, 08:59
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, Jo Schaper, 08:15
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), allangmiller, 07:55
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, bodrules, 07:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, bodrules, 07:42
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 07:19
Re: curvature of old rocks, don findlay, 06:44
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 06:25
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 06:10
Re: curvature of old rocks, Mo, 02:39
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Timberwoof, 01:47
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Timberwoof, 01:43
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 01:42
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 01:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 01:36
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 01:11
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 00:59
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, hlg, 00:51
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:46
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, will1, 00:27

June 25, 2006

Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 23:23
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 23:14
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 20:41
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 20:03
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 18:41
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx, 18:16
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 18:11
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, John Popelish, 14:20
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 13:44
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 13:29
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 13:21
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 13:16
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, coastwatch, 13:13
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Ernest Major, 12:27
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 12:24
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 12:15
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), allanm, 12:03
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Desertphile, 11:55
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 11:43
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., mmurphy72, 11:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Todd A. Farmerie, 11:25
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., George, 11:08
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 10:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, TCE, 09:58
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 09:50
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, don findlay, 09:37
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Lee Oswald Ving, 09:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, tadchem, 08:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, George, 07:15
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., michael . palmer1, 06:00
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., don findlay, 05:13
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Jonathan Silverlight, 04:52
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, michael . palmer1, 04:43
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, mike3, 04:40
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, Timberwoof, 03:32
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 03:20
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Marc, 03:19
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 03:18
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Carsten Troelsgaard, 03:05
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 02:50
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 02:44
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 02:42
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 02:33
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Kermit, 02:33
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 02:30
Re: Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., Jo Schaper, 01:49
Colorado river compared to Mississippi, Missouri, rio grande etc., mmurphy72, 01:01
Re: curvature of old rocks, don findlay, 00:51
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:36
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 4, don findlay, 00:35
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Thurisaz the Einherjer, 00:28
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:17
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:03
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:02
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:01
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:00
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:00
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 00:00

June 24, 2006

Re: curvature of old rocks, tadchem, 23:22
Re: curvature of old rocks, Harry K, 23:02
Re: curvature of old rocks, will1, 16:03
Re: curvature of old rocks, will1, 15:59
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, will1, 15:07
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 14:28
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Lee Oswald Ving, 14:26
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Ernest Major, 14:18
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, coaster, 14:07
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 13:50
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 13:31
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:24
Re: Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Ye Old One, 13:09
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 12:49
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Timberwoof, 12:02
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 12:00
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 12:00
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Timberwoof, 11:58
Re: curvature of old rocks, Timberwoof, 11:52
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 11:48
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 11:44
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 11:39
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, John Popelish, 11:38
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, will1, 11:19
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 11:13
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, John Curtis, 11:11
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, brent23, 11:06
Re: Rock found at Llantwit Major, George, 10:40
Re: curvature of old rocks, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank, 10:32
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 10:00
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Jim Lillie, 09:21
Rock found at Llantwit Major, Wazflam the imperrigable, 09:06
Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, Wakboth, 08:56
Re: curvature of old rocks, Mo, 08:37
Re: curvature of old rocks, don findlay, 07:47
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3, don findlay, 07:39
Re: curvature of old rocks, oriel36, 07:13
Re: curvature of old rocks, Mo, 06:58
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 06:15
Re: curvature of old rocks, don findlay, 05:37
curvature of old rocks, Mo, 04:19
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 02:20
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 02:17
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Marc, 02:08
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 01:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 00:54
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 00:43

June 23, 2006

Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 22:53
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 22:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 22:02
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:51
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:51
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:40
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:37
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 21:12
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 20:28
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 19:36
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, Perplexed in Peoria, 19:05
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 18:28
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., traklman, 18:17
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., traklman, 18:15
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 17:45
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 17:22
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., J. Taylor, 17:17
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robin Levett, 15:40
Re: Simulation of meteorite impact, George, 14:05
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 13:22
Simulation of meteorite impact, Gautam Majumdar, 13:18
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 12:45
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Inez, 12:42
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 12:26
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 12:22
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 11:54
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 11:47
Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), SBC Yahoo, 11:42
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:41
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Jo Schaper, 10:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Inez, 09:57
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Mark VandeWettering, 09:48
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), jrsp8s, 09:46
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Inez, 09:29
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), John Harshman, 09:14
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Gerry Murphy, 07:04
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), Marc, 06:59
Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 2.), don findlay, 06:29
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 06:04
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 06:03
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., stew dean, 05:04
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 03:44
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 02:39
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 02:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 02:25
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 02:17
Re: Spelunker's 41-Year-Old Remains to Surface, Jo Schaper, 00:08

June 22, 2006

Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, don findlay, 21:52
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, pete, 21:15
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 20:51
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 20:50
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 17:35
Spelunker's 41-Year-Old Remains to Surface, George, 16:24
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Inez, 13:35
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 13:06
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 12:35
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Klaus, 10:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Von R. Smith, 09:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 08:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 08:34
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 01:57
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 01:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), J. Taylor, 00:47

June 21, 2006

Re: The smart ones seldom insult., Gregory A Greenman, 22:11
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 21:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 21:38
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 21:37
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:04
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 20:02
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 19:05
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Popelish, 18:07
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Inez, 15:18
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), bhawes, 14:12
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 13:27
Re: The smart ones seldom insult., T Wake, 13:13
Re: The smart ones seldom insult., David Iain Greig, 11:25
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 10:15
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 09:58
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 09:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Richard Forrest, 07:05
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 06:52
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Richard Smol, 06:05
The smart ones seldom insult., Jeff…Relf, 05:00
Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Ye Old One, 04:37
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 04:14
Re: Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Aidan Karley, 04:14
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 04:14
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 04:14
Re: Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Aidan Karley, 04:14
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 00:18

June 20, 2006

Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., josephus, 21:14
Re: Ttreasury of Petra, raccoonspace@xxxxxxxxx, 20:56
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 18:53
Ttreasury of Petra, SBC Yahoo, 16:45
Re: Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Perplexed in Peoria, 15:59
Re: The _Width_ of the early _Visible_ univserse has nothing to do with it's age., T Wake, 14:07
Re: Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Paul Ciszek, 14:03
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 12:57
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bill Hudson, 12:19
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 12:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bill Hudson, 10:42
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., SeppoP, 09:46
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 08:34
The _Width_ of the early _Visible_ univserse has nothing to do with it's age., Jeff…Relf, 08:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 05:56
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Aidan Karley, 05:56
ACME Bank superior customer service, raccoonspace@xxxxxxxxx, 02:36

June 19, 2006

Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 23:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Wilkins, 22:57
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 22:48
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 22:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:25
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 22:23
Re: Pitman still arguing for a 6th millenniumBCE Black Sea Flood, Jim Lillie, 22:17
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:16
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:13
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 21:44
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:43
Re: A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:41
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:39
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:32
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:27
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:25
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 21:24
Re: A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Timberwoof, 21:22
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 20:18
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Aidan Karley, 19:02
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 19:02
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Ben Standeven, 18:42
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), will1, 17:13
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, George, 16:07
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, George, 15:56
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, John Curtis, 15:44
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robert Grumbine, 15:41
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Walter Bushell, 15:29
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robert Weldon, 15:17
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., oriel36, 14:49
Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:33
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:31
Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Eric Gisse, 14:02
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 13:34
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rick++, 13:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 12:37
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 12:30
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 12:12
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:51
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), David Iain Greig, 11:49
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), r norman, 11:48
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, SBC Yahoo, 11:44
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:28
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:27
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 11:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 11:25
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:24
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 11:24
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, W. Watson, 11:18
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, W. Watson, 11:06
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Popelish, 11:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robert Grumbine, 10:36
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 10:33
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 10:33
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, Jo Schaper, 10:31
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 10:17
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 10:16
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 10:15
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Wilkins, 10:08
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., elcidbivar, 10:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 10:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., David Iain Greig, 09:58
Re: Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Gregory A Greenman, 09:51
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 09:43
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), rja . carnegie, 09:42
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 09:39
Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Ye Old One, 09:24
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 09:23
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 09:18
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:44
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 08:42
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., T Wake, 08:34
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., T Wake, 08:33
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:31
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 08:31
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., T Wake, 08:30
Re: 5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., T Wake, 08:06
NOMINATION FOR LOONEY MAROON AWARD: Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:57
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 07:35
Re: Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Ye Old One, 07:14
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Ye Old One, 07:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 06:47
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, Aidan Karley, 06:37
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 06:37
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:19
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 05:33
Standards are like items on a menu, please chose wisely., Jeff…Relf, 05:32
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Aidan Karley, 04:42
Re: 5 Missing - of whom 2 died, Aidan Karley, 04:42
5 spatial/immutable/parochial dimensions: Entropy_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 04:38
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 04:30
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, George, 03:43
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robin Levett, 03:40
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Gregory A Greenman, 03:11
A Bose-Einstein system's population inversion has negative Kelvins., Jeff…Relf, 02:54
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Perplexed in Peoria, 02:45
Just locate and engage in more constructive activites., Jeff…Relf, 01:56
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Michael Siemon, 01:49
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 01:40
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), bob young, 01:37
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 01:36
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 01:28
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Perplexed in Peoria, 01:22
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Dan Tilque, 01:19
Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Timberwoof, 01:17
Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Timberwoof, 01:08
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 01:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Timberwoof, 00:59
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible chez watt ?), Marc, 00:57
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, pogostix, 00:27

June 18, 2006

Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 23:52
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Alan Kellogg, 23:46
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Alan Kellogg, 23:43
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Alan Kellogg, 23:40
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 23:38
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Marc, 23:12
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Kermit, 23:05
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 22:56
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:52
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Harshman, 22:48
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:36
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 22:33
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Marc, 22:03
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), will1, 21:48
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:45
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:45
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 21:44
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 21:43
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 21:43
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 21:43
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 21:42
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 21:42
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Jeff…Relf, 21:29
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 21:16
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:42
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Timberwoof, 20:22
Re: You can see the _True_ thread here..., Tom McDonald, 20:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 19:54
Re: Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:45
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 19:33
Duckie, You can't bullsh_t me, so don't even try., Jeff…Relf, 19:32
You can see the _True_ thread here..., Jeff…Relf, 19:28
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 19:27
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Robert Grumbine, 19:25
Re: An ever-constant lambda/w is the best model/simplest of inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:23
Re: Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:21
An ever-constant lambda/w is the best/simplest model of inflation., Jeff…Relf, 19:12
An ever-constant lambda/w is the best model/simplest of inflation., Jeff…Relf, 19:11
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, George, 18:55
Re: Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:48
Planck_Surveyor: A time evolution of w would raise challenging questions., Jeff…Relf, 18:40
Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Gregory A Greenman, 18:25
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, John Curtis, 18:21
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Kermit, 16:05
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Popelish, 15:54
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), r norman, 15:01
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Robert Carnegie, 14:47
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, Perplexed in Peoria, 14:16
Re: The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, T Wake, 14:10
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ye Old One, 13:57
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 13:17
Re: It's been at least 78 billion light-years since the Planck length transition., Ye Old One, 13:16
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Mark VandeWettering, 12:57
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 12:49
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Desertphile, 12:43
Re: Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, Roger Bagula, 12:28
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Klaus, 12:14
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Grandbank, 11:56
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), CreateThis, 11:38
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), John Harshman, 11:35
Re: Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), Timberwoof, 11:32
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 11:32
Was Proto-earth a Gas Giant ?, John Curtis, 11:16
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 10:59
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 10:52
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 10:29
Plate Tectonics:- (No credible mechanism - 1.), don findlay, 10:18
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Inez, 10:11
Re: Internet_Thieves !, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:12
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 08:11
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 07:39
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Shane, 07:32
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., oriel36, 06:55
The WMAP guys picked their inflation model out of a hat !, Jeff…Relf, 05:32
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 03:11
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 02:38
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Peter Barber, 02:03
I Googled: directional site:NetStumbler.COM, Jeff…Relf, 01:44
I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., Jeff…Relf, 01:41
Re: John Harshman invites comment, eyelessgame, 01:39
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Kermit, 01:14
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Kermit, 01:11
Re: Internet_Thieves !, Eric Gisse, 01:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 00:54
Re: Internet_Thieves !, T Wake, 00:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 00:19
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., John Wilkins, 00:15
Internet_Thieves !, Jeff…Relf, 00:13

June 17, 2006

Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 23:51
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., AC, 23:46
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Jeffrey Turner, 23:29
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 23:19
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Inez, 22:57
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., RAM, 22:56
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, George, 21:13
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 18:54
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Shane, 18:24
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bob Casanova, 18:17
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 17:35
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, MiRe, 17:15
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 17:14
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 17:10
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., TomS, 17:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 17:05
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bobby D. Bryant, 15:58
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:56
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 15:50
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Kleuskes & Moos, 15:49
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 15:29
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 15:27
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 15:25
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., SRNissen, 15:20
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., will1, 15:03
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 14:04
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 13:52
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 13:48
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Mark VandeWettering, 13:38
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., dkomo, 13:37
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 13:35
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bobby D. Bryant, 13:18
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Timberwoof, 13:13
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 13:10
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Tom McDonald, 12:53
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., NRen2k5, 12:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jim Willemin, 12:42
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Bobby D. Bryant, 12:36
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Wakboth, 12:25
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., r norman, 12:21
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, Jim Lillie, 12:07
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Desertphile, 12:06
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 12:04
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Desertphile, 11:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 11:51
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 11:21
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 11:18
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., bullpup, 11:16
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., jimp, 11:05
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Desertphile, 10:36
Re: Coming soon to a newgroup near you., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:33
Coming soon to a newgroup near you., don findlay, 10:13
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 09:55
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 09:34
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 08:16
Re: falsies - your turn, Robert Grumbine, 07:16
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 07:10
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 06:51
Re: falsies - your turn, Petra, 06:39
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 05:56
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 05:52
Re: falsies - your turn, rja . carnegie, 04:38
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Timberwoof, 03:07
Re: falsies - your turn, Carsten Troelsgaard, 02:48
Re: 5 Missing - of whom 2 died, Perplexed in Peoria, 02:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 01:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 01:02
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, J. Taylor, 00:41
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, pete, 00:20

June 16, 2006

Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 23:35
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 23:33
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 22:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 22:24
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 22:21
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 22:21
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 22:06
Re: The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., Gerry Murphy, 21:36
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:33
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:29
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, J. Taylor, 20:39
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, Ken Wood, 20:25
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, noman, 19:27
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 19:21
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, J. Taylor, 18:58
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, J. Taylor, 18:55
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 18:39
Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, Jim Lillie, 18:09
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 17:21
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 16:31
Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl, Aidan Karley, 16:31
Re: Water - Where did it all come from?, SBC Yahoo, 16:30
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 16:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 16:07
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 15:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 15:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Matt Silberstein, 15:02
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 15:00
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 14:16
Re: Chez Watt(Re: falsies - your turn), Robert Weldon, 14:08
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 14:02
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Klaus, 13:42
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 13:30
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., TomS, 13:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 12:59
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Popelish, 12:56
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 12:47
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 12:38
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 12:10
Re: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, don findlay, 12:04
Q: Water - Where did it all come from?, MiRe, 11:50
Re: falsies - your turn, Kermit, 11:39
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 11:33
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., jimp, 11:25
Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., T Wake, 11:18
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 11:03
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 10:57
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 10:48
Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered, don findlay, 10:46
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 10:34
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 10:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jim Willemin, 10:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 10:15
Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., TomS, 10:12
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 09:56
Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., T Wake, 09:52
Re: falsies - your turn, rja . carnegie, 09:44
Re: It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., UC, 09:27
It's been at least 78 billion light-years since the Planck length transition., Jeff…Relf, 08:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 07:29
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., john_bode, 07:00
It's been 78 billion light-years and 3 thousand degrees K since the CMB event., Jeff…Relf, 06:07
Re: Self Appointed Geoscientists., CrankHater, 04:56
Re: The start of the big bang..., CrankHater, 04:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Charles Cagle, 03:01
Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered, Charles Cagle, 01:55
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, J. Taylor, 01:53
Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Jeff…Relf, 01:48
Positrons are not perfectly modeled., Jeff…Relf, 01:36
Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered, don findlay, 01:27
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, pete, 01:18
Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered, Charles Cagle, 00:10

June 15, 2006

Re: falsies - your turn, Bobby D. Bryant, 22:09
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:48
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 21:20
Re: falsies - your turn, Matt Silberstein, 21:15
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:04
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 21:03
Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 20:54
Re: falsies - your turn, Art Deco, 20:51
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 20:40
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:38
Re: falsies - your turn, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:32
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:27
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:27
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:26
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:25
Re: Chez Watt(Re: falsies - your turn), Walter Bushell, 19:37
Re: falsies - your turn, traklman, 17:43
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ken Shackleton, 14:01
Re: Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., Tracy P. Hamilton, 13:43
Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 13:28
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 13:10
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 12:57
Re: Mass outside our cosmic horizon effects the cosmic horizon., T Wake, 12:55
Re: Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., T Wake, 12:51
Re: Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., T Wake, 12:50
Re: w = -1 vs. Cosmic_Inflation., T Wake, 12:48
Re: Pre-CMB gravity was powerful, leaving _Patterns_ in the CMB., T Wake, 12:43
Re: falsies - your turn, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:41
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 12:34
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Rising-Star8471, 11:43
Re: falsies - your turn, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:34
Re: Falsies, don findlay, 11:25
Re: falsies - your turn, Kermit, 11:21
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 11:19
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Bode, 10:50
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 10:00
Opportunity breaks free!, rick++, 09:24
Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 09:12
Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 09:00
Yellowstone geyser erupts for 1st time in 8 years, George, 08:47
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 06:24
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 06:15
Mass outside our cosmic horizon effects the cosmic horizon., Jeff…Relf, 04:23
w = -1 vs. Cosmic_Inflation., Jeff…Relf, 04:04
Positrons are not well understood, they might be holes in some ground state., Jeff…Relf, 03:50
Re: falsies - your turn, Robin Levett, 03:41
Looking for pre-CMB Gravitational_Radiation indicating a high-lambda., Jeff…Relf, 03:22
Falsies, Fanny Dildo, 01:44
Pre-CMB gravity was powerful, leaving _Patterns_ in the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 01:41
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Rising-Star8471, 01:32
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 01:09

June 14, 2006

Re: falsies - your turn, Kermit, 22:58
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 22:49
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:19
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 21:14
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:09
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:45
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:10
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:07
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 20:00
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 19:37
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 18:49
5 Missing, Petra, 18:17
Volcano erupts on Java, not many killed, Perplexed in Peoria, 17:40
Re: falsies - your turn, oriel36, 17:11
Re: falsies - your turn, Aidan Karley, 16:36
Re: falsies - your turn, Aidan Karley, 16:36
Re: falsies - your turn, Aidan Karley, 16:36
Re: Evidence Meteor Caused Permian-Triassic Extinction?, Aidan Karley, 16:36
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 16:36
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 15:40
Re: falsies - your turn, jrsp8s, 15:12
Re: falsies - your turn, Cyde Weys, 15:01
Re: The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., T Wake, 13:56
Re: You can't see beyond the cosmic horizon., T Wake, 13:54
Re: The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., T Wake, 13:47
Re: An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over � trillions of years prior to the CMB., T Wake, 13:28
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., T Wake, 13:14
Re: falsies - your turn, Kermit, 12:41
Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 11:20
Re New Madrid Earthquake, Jo Schaper, 10:49
Re: New Madrid Earthquake, Jo Schaper, 10:48
Re: New Madrid Earthquake, Jo Schaper, 10:40
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 10:40
Re: Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Ye Old One, 10:26
Re: falsies - your turn, don findlay, 06:53
Re: falsies - your turn, oriel36, 06:04
The temperature/entropy dimension of you life is set in stone, immutable., Jeff…Relf, 05:06
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Ewan Kahana, 02:28
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Ewan Kahana, 02:27
New Madrid Earthquake, GoldMine, 01:01

June 13, 2006

Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Odysseus, 23:51
Re: An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over � trillions of years prior to the CMB., Timberwoof, 23:45
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Art Deco, 23:40
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robin Levett, 23:14
Re: Chez Watt(Re: falsies - your turn), John Wilkins, 23:10
Re: falsies - your turn, Robert Grumbine, 22:15
Chez Watt(Re: falsies - your turn), Don Cates, 22:06
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ari Allyn-Feuer, 20:42
RE: (meteorobs) More on the Norwegian Meteorite, W. Watson, 18:50
Re: falsies - your turn, Shane, 18:49
Re: falsies - your turn, Oxidized, 18:48
Re: falsies - your turn, Alan Morgan, 18:28
Re: falsies - your turn, George, 18:20
Re: falsies - your turn, Grandbank, 18:10
Re: falsies - your turn, George, 18:09
Re: falsies - your turn, jrsp8s, 18:00
Re: falsies - your turn, Robert Carnegie, 17:43
Re: falsies - your turn, Oxidized, 17:42
Re: The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., gresham, 17:15
Re: falsies - your turn, Rotwang, 17:10
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 17:01
Re: falsies - your turn, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx, 16:40
Re: falsies - your turn, Ken Shackleton, 16:26
Re: falsies - your turn, dysfunction, 16:10
Re: falsies - your turn, Mark VandeWettering, 16:03
Re: falsies - your turn, Bill Hudson, 16:02
Re: falsies - your turn, Dan Luke, 15:51
Re: falsies - your turn, Robert Grumbine, 14:33
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 14:25
Re: falsies - your turn, Klaus, 14:10
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Harshman, 14:08
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:03
Re: falsies - your turn, Ken Shackleton, 14:03
Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 13:50
Re: falsies - your turn, Desertphile, 13:48
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 13:42
Re: falsies - your turn, John Harshman, 13:30
Re: falsies - your turn, will1, 13:27
Re: falsies - your turn, David Iain Greig, 13:19
Re: falsies - your turn, Richard Forrest, 13:03
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert Grumbine, 12:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., TomS, 12:49
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Griffin, 12:33
falsies - your turn, don findlay, 12:33
falsies - your turn -, don findlay, 12:29
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:23
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:23
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:21
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:20
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:19
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 12:18
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 12:18
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 12:18
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., mcv, 11:53
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 10:45
Evidence Meteor Caused Permian-Triassic Extinction?, rms, 08:53
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Art Deco, 08:34
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Art Deco, 08:31
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Jim Lillie, 08:30
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:15
Re: Self Appointed Geoscientists., George, 05:42
Re: An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Sorcerer, 05:37
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Joe Jakarta, 05:13
The effects of scale on a priori knowledge and the false arrow of time., Jeff…Relf, 04:51
You can't see beyond the cosmic horizon., Jeff…Relf, 03:58
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Don Cates, 01:58
Re: Lake Kivu methane, larsbell@xxxxxxxxx, 00:52

June 12, 2006

An ever-constant lambda ( w = -1 ) over ¿ trillions of years prior to the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 23:21
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Timberwoof, 22:40
An Introduction: Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Art Deco, 22:26
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ari Allyn-Feuer, 20:29
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ari Allyn-Feuer, 20:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 19:10
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, George, 19:00
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 18:55
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:31
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 18:13
The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 18:13
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 18:07
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 18:01
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Bode, 17:57
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 17:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jonathan Silverlight, 17:41
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 17:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 17:04
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Bill Hudson, 17:04
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 16:31
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Aidan Karley, 16:31
Re: Great Unconformity, Daryl Krupa, 15:09
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, Daryl Krupa, 13:58
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 13:40
Re: Gravity works on the total mass-energy, not just the visually observable mass., T Wake, 13:32
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., T Wake, 13:30
Re: WMAP's error bars., T Wake, 13:24
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:04
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:02
The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 12:45
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ben Standeven, 12:45
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., J. Taylor, 12:14
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., John Harshman, 12:02
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:01
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 12:01
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, will1, 11:44
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Harshman, 11:43
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 11:19
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Kermit, 11:11
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Stanley Friesen, 10:45
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Inez, 10:03
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:37
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 08:31
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 08:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 08:18
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 08:16
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 08:16
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, George, 08:03
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, Duh_OZ, 07:47
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, George, 06:08
Gravity works on the total mass-energy, not just the visually observable mass., Jeff…Relf, 04:01
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Richard Forrest, 03:13
WMAP's error bars., Jeff…Relf, 03:04
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ari Allyn-Feuer, 02:39
Re: The observed lambda is a from of inflation, just slower and ever-constant., T Wake, 01:44
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Wakboth, 01:02
The observed lambda is a from of inflation, just slower and ever-constant., Jeff…Relf, 00:04

June 11, 2006

Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 23:12
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 23:11
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Jim Lillie, 22:40
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, will1, 21:02
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, jonathan, 20:30
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 20:30
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., George, 20:23
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, George, 20:23
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Shane, 19:49
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, Aidan Karley, 19:34
Re: Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, Aidan Karley, 19:12
Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 19:12
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Aidan Karley, 19:12
Re: Plonk, Aidan Karley, 19:12
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 19:12
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Harshman, 18:52
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Faux_Pseudo, 18:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert J. Kolker, 18:43
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., George, 18:35
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Stile4aly, 18:24
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Klaus, 18:15
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Sam Wormley, 16:54
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:46
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., T Wake, 16:40
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 16:25
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:18
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:17
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:17
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:17
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:16
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:16
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 16:15
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:15
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:15
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:14
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:14
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:13
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 16:11
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Timberwoof, 16:10
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, John Harshman, 11:54
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, tadchem, 11:08
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Jim Lillie, 10:23
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Robin Levett, 09:44
Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Robert J. Kolker, 09:06
Re: Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Robert J. Kolker, 08:14
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Zachriel, 08:06
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert J. Kolker, 07:58
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert J. Kolker, 07:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robert J. Kolker, 07:51
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Shane, 07:49
Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Ye Old One, 06:03
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Stuart, 06:00
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., George, 05:58
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Peter Barber, 05:52
Re: Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., T Wake, 05:51
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., George, 05:51
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, George, 05:49
Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., T Wake, 05:43
Re: 13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., T Wake, 05:42
Re: No information, no causality, exceeds the speed of light., T Wake, 05:31
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Carsten Troelsgaard, 05:23
Imagine _Today_'s 4D spacetime geometry as the 2D surface of ballon..., Jeff…Relf, 04:45
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Richard Forrest, 04:26
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rolf, 04:12
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Ernest Major, 04:12
13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Jeff…Relf, 03:29
Re: Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Timberwoof, 03:11
13.7 billion years of cosmological time equals..., Jeff…Relf, 03:11
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, W. Watson, 01:25
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 00:57
Physical_Cosmos vs Kosmos, Cosmological_Time vs Cosmic_Time., Jeff…Relf, 00:40
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 00:17
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Desertphile, 00:05

June 10, 2006

Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 23:04
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Sam Wormley, 23:02
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Rising-Star8471, 22:50
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, Daryl Krupa, 22:30
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, W. Watson, 22:24
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, W. Watson, 22:19
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Klaus, 22:18
Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Jeff…Relf, 22:03
No information, no causality, exceeds the speed of light., Jeff…Relf, 21:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Perplexed in Peoria, 21:41
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, bullpup, 21:34
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 21:33
Re: Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, Marc, 21:32
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Jim Lillie, 21:18
Plonk, Jim Lillie, 21:06
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Kermit, 21:04
Since that didn't work, trying yet again - please, don findlay, 21:01
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:40
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:39
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:39
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:39
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 20:38
Re: Vostok Ice Core Data, Daryl Krupa, 19:31
Large Meteorite Hits Northern Norway, George, 17:42
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 17:25
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Aidan Karley, 16:20
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 16:20
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:39
Identifification, Carsten Troelsgaard, 15:33
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Bobby D. Bryant, 14:54
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., CreateThis, 14:27
Re: Reading Recommendations, Question Quigley, 13:42
Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 13:30
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Question Quigley, 13:23
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Question Quigley, 13:13
Re: IMAGING EARTH'S INTERIOR, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 13:10
Re: Mini-dinosaurs From The Harz Mountains: Bones Are Of Dwarf Sauropods, coastwatch, 12:36
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Sam Wormley, 12:16
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Zachriel, 11:55
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Ringer, 11:46
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., David Iain Greig, 11:42
falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 11:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Richard Forrest, 11:22
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Richard Forrest, 11:21
falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., don findlay, 11:14
Vostok Ice Core Data, W. Watson, 10:29
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension, Robert J. Kolker, 09:35
Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., T Wake, 09:26
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, T Wake, 09:25
Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., T Wake, 09:25
Re: Where all the mass-energy once was, 13.7 billion light-years away., T Wake, 09:24
Re: The entropy intrinsic to mass-energy over cosmic-time., T Wake, 09:20
Re: -ct ^ .5, T Wake, 09:16
Re: Temperature is relativistic., T Wake, 09:14
Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Robert J. Kolker, 08:12
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Gerry Murphy, 07:13
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., George, 06:32
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., George, 06:21
Re: Dwarf Dinos, Ancient Stromatolites and Giant Eruptions, George, 06:06
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Aidan Karley, 05:23
IMAGING EARTH'S INTERIOR, rambiz, 05:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 04:22
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Jonathan Silverlight, 03:40
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Jonathan Silverlight, 03:37
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 01:28
Temperature is relativistic., Jeff…Relf, 00:22

June 09, 2006

Re: New GIS & Geology Software available, Aidan Karley, 23:50
Re: Mini-dinosaurs From The Harz Mountains: Bones Are Of Dwarf Sauropods, Aidan Karley, 23:50
Re: Dwarf Dinos, Ancient Stromatolites and Giant Eruptions, Aidan Karley, 23:50
Where all the mass-energy once was, 13.7 billion light-years away., Jeff…Relf, 23:38
Re: Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:26
The entropy intrinsic to mass-energy over cosmic-time., Jeff…Relf, 23:20
Re: -ct ^ .5, Eric Gisse, 22:46
Samichlaus only takes 10 months to ferment, not 13.7 billion years., Jeff…Relf, 22:42
-ct ^ .5, Jeff…Relf, 22:24
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Eric Gisse, 21:51
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 20:44
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:29
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:24
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Gerry Murphy, 20:20
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:16
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 20:14
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:09
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 20:06
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Gerry Murphy, 20:05
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, Marc, 20:01
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 19:59
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 19:58
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 19:52
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Robert Weldon, 19:43
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 19:37
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 19:19
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 19:18
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views, Jeff…Relf, 19:17
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 19:12
I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., Jeff…Relf, 19:11
Re: Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:04
Every word I wrote is still there, locked up., Jeff…Relf, 19:03
Re: I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., T Wake, 18:56
Re: What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, T Wake, 18:54
Re: I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:53
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:53
What are the units of General_Relativity's time-like dimension ?, Jeff…Relf, 18:52
I wouldn't be surprised if Larry_Sanger agrees with what I wrote., Jeff…Relf, 18:47
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 18:21
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:25
Re: John Harshman invites comment, J. Taylor, 17:06
Re: John Harshman invites comment, J. Taylor, 16:57
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 16:41
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., T Wake, 16:37
Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 16:31
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 16:30
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Carsten Troelsgaard, 16:08
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Bode, 15:59
Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 15:52
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Eric Gisse, 15:17
FUSE Spacecraft Finds Infant Solar System Awash in Carbon, J. Taylor, 15:14
Macquarie Scientist Reveals Astounding Record of Earliest Life, J. Taylor, 15:10
The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Jeff…Relf, 15:08
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Jeff…Relf, 14:59
Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 13:03
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 12:56
Re: New GIS & Geology Software available, Thierry, 12:26
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 12:08
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Popelish, 11:39
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Richard Forrest, 11:19
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Wilkins, 11:15
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 10:30
Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Tracy P. Hamilton, 10:14
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Stanley Friesen, 10:08
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 09:51
Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., T Wake, 09:36
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 09:30
Re: The start of the big bang..., T Wake, 09:28
Re: Particle_Energy = Temperature., T Wake, 09:19
Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 09:04
Re: Mini-dinosaurs From The Harz Mountains: Bones Are Of Dwarf Sauropods, Jo Schaper, 08:54
Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 08:52
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 07:32
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 06:43
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 06:42
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 06:41
Re: The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Shane, 06:28
Re: Minerals go "dark" near Earth’s core, Alan Johnson, 05:29
Volcano cam tourism note: Popo at night, Belba Grubb, 05:17
Re: Great Unconformity, Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Dwarf Dinos, Ancient Stromatolites and Giant Eruptions, Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Aidan Karley, 05:05
Re: Great Unconformity, Carsten Troelsgaard, 05:02
The 13.7 billion light-years number must be too low., Jeff…Relf, 04:26
Re: Minerals go "dark" near Earth�s core, Carsten Troelsgaard, 04:13
Particle_Energy = Temperature., Jeff…Relf, 03:19
Mini-dinosaurs From The Harz Mountains: Bones Are Of Dwarf Sauropods, Alan Johnson, 03:06
Minerals go "dark" near Earth’s core, Alan Johnson, 02:40
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Alan Johnson, 02:36
Re: The start of the big bang..., Matt Silberstein, 02:09
The start of the big bang..., Jeff…Relf, 00:49
Karley, what do you do with Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 00:25
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 00:17

June 08, 2006

Re: Great Unconformity, George, 23:49
Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 23:28
Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 23:23
Re: Crank_Hater, which " Wiki articles on relativity " did you write ?, Eric Gisse, 22:37
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 22:33
Crank_Hater, which " Wiki articles on relativity " did you write ?, Jeff…Relf, 22:06
Re: Dwarf Dinos, Ancient Stromatolites and Giant Eruptions, Jo Schaper, 21:41
Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 21:35
Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 21:32
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 21:21
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Kermit, 21:09
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 21:06
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 21:05
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:44
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 20:25
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 20:23
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, don findlay, 20:19
Re: Great Unconformity, Jo Schaper, 20:19
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 20:15
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, SRNissen, 19:38
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, bullpup, 19:32
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John C. Polasek, 19:30
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, don findlay, 19:27
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Shane, 19:03
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John Bode, 18:15
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 17:34
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Aidan Karley, 17:22
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 17:22
Dwarf Dinos, Ancient Stromatolites and Giant Eruptions, coastwatch, 16:10
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 16:09
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 15:53
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 15:51
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 15:31
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, John C. Polasek, 14:21
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 14:10
Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., wade, 14:08
Re: Silberstein is a man of few words and even less understanding., Jim Lillie, 13:45
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 13:41
Re: Great Unconformity, Sandune, 13:13
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 13:12
Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 13:03
Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., T Wake, 13:02
Re: I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., T Wake, 12:59
Re: What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, T Wake, 12:57
Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, T Wake, 12:54
Re: Great Unconformity, George, 12:50
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 12:49
Re: The ever-constant lambda in the ever-flat spacetime., T Wake, 12:48
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 12:47
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, T Wake, 12:39
Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., T Wake, 12:33
Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., T Wake, 12:32
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 12:00
Great Unconformity, Sandune, 11:40
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Carsten Troelsgaard, 11:35
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Sandune, 11:17
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Robert J. Kolker, 11:12
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 11:06
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, David Iain Greig, 10:59
Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 10:52
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 10:41
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 10:40
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Aidan Karley, 10:22
Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 10:21
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 10:17
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Nosterill, 09:57
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 09:49
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 09:48
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, SeppoP, 09:27
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Nosterill, 09:27
Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 09:05
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, UC, 09:01
Re: Mt. Merapi goes..., Belba Grubb, 08:58
Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, chrisv, 08:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 08:02
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:28
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 07:22
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Shane, 07:02
Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Shane, 06:55
Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., CrankHater, 06:51
Re: WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:41
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, CrankHater, 06:40
Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., Jeff…Relf, 05:55
Re: I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., CrankHater, 05:53
Re: Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Alan Kellogg, 05:39
I have Too_Many people talking to me, not too few., Jeff…Relf, 05:30
The ever-constant lambda in the ever-flat spacetime., Jeff…Relf, 05:03
Re: An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., Kleuskes & Moos, 04:48
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 04:26
An electron's volume/temperature is unmeasurable., Jeff…Relf, 04:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 04:14
Where is the center of gravity of the observed universe ?, Jeff…Relf, 04:09
New GIS & Geology Software available, sigeol.com - GIS & Geology, 03:44
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 03:36
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 03:21
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 03:11
Re: John Harshman invites comment, J. Taylor, 03:04
WikiPedia.ORG vs. BBC.CO.UK, Jeff…Relf, 02:14

June 07, 2006

Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 23:55
What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:48
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 23:16
Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., bullpup, 23:15
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Shane, 23:12
Re: The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Shane, 23:10
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 22:43
Re: Nominative determinism, Robert Flory, 22:38
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Robert Flory, 22:20
Re: table for geologic data, Martin, 21:58
The energy of an atom is hotter than an ideal vacuum., Jeff…Relf, 21:29
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jpopelish, 20:50
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:36
Re: John Harshman invites comment, dkomo, 20:29
Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:03
Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 19:18
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes, WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_orange, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:07
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes, WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Jaffa_orange, Jeff…Relf, 19:05
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 18:47
Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., T Wake, 18:43
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:43
Re: Most have no postulates... nothing to give., George, 18:43
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 18:41
Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:41
The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., Jeff…Relf, 18:40
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 18:38
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., T Wake, 18:37
Re: Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:20
Dual_Booting to a Linux desktop., Jeff…Relf, 18:18
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:54
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., T Wake, 17:50
Re: In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., T Wake, 17:47
Cleveland Volcano Picture, Charles, 17:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 17:25
Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 17:21
In the Lambda_CDM model, time is modeled as a spatial dimension: ct., Jeff…Relf, 17:14
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:08
Re: Usenet employs and entirely different currency., T Wake, 17:02
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 16:57
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 16:54
Usenet employs and entirely different currency., Jeff…Relf, 16:50
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, George, 16:49
Re: My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 16:34
My 5D model: Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 16:23
Re: Nominative determinism, DQ, 16:08
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 16:02
Re: Most have no postulates... nothing to give., Aidan Karley, 16:02
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 15:41
Re: John Harshman invites comment, eyelessgame, 15:31
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, John Harshman, 15:20
Re: John Harshman invites comment, eyelessgame, 15:13
EARTH IMAGING TUTORIAL, rambiz, 15:01
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, SRNissen, 14:31
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:24
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 14:15
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., T Wake, 13:57
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 13:55
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., T Wake, 13:54
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 13:51
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., wade, 13:38
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Jo Schaper, 13:09
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Kleuskes & Moos, 13:09
Re: John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 13:05
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, don findlay, 12:58
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 12:58
Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Hans, 12:34
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., SBC Yahoo, 11:15
Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 10:47
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Carsten Troelsgaard, 10:43
Re: 500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Jo Schaper, 10:42
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Stanley Friesen, 09:41
Re: Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Shane, 09:14
Re: Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Aidan Karley, 07:35
Re: 500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Aidan Karley, 07:35
Re: A 37 million year old lake?, Aidan Karley, 07:35
Re: 500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Aidan Karley, 07:35
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 07:35
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, John Curtis, 07:16
Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., CrankHater, 05:19
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 04:48
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 04:46
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 04:45
Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 04:09
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Einstein showed how we're like lit matches... sans true free will., Jeff…Relf, 02:35
Re: 500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Paul Ciszek, 01:37
Re: 500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Sir Charles W. Shults III, 01:28
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Paul Ciszek, 01:20
Wilkes Land and Bedout impacts, Paul Ciszek, 01:10
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 01:08
A 37 million year old lake?, Paul Ciszek, 01:02
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:57
500 million year old poo and Oxygen, Paul Ciszek, 00:49
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Radix2, 00:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Shane, 00:39
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Wilkins, 00:31
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Wilkins, 00:28
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 00:27
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 00:25
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Charles, 00:19
Re: I found out where they are coming from....!, will1, 00:17
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Radix2, 00:09

June 06, 2006

Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, peterbarber73, 23:34
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Desertphile, 23:20
Re: John Harshman invites comment, coaster, 23:15
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, OvC, 23:15
Re: John Harshman invites comment, George, 23:07
Re: Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., George, 23:02
I found out where they are coming from....!, Jo Schaper, 22:17
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, shipmodeler1, 22:10
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Inez, 21:59
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 21:09
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Stuart, 21:06
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Desertphile, 21:06
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=, 20:08
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Inez, 19:34
Ok, if Carsten can do video, so can I..., Jo Schaper, 19:18
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank, 19:07
Re: John Harshman invites comment, John Harshman, 19:01
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, John Harshman, 18:58
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, don findlay, 18:30
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Inez, 18:25
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 17:58
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 17:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:30
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:30
Re: Silberstein is a man of few words and even less understanding., T Wake, 17:29
Re: Silberstein is a man of few words and even less understanding., Matt Silberstein, 17:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:19
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Pip R. Lagenta, 17:16
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 16:57
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 16:50
Silberstein is a man of few words and even less understanding., Jeff…Relf, 16:42
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Ferrous Patella, 16:28
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 16:06
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 16:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 15:46
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 15:40
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 15:36
Re: A nice Rocky Mtn website, Sandune, 15:18
Re: 500 million year old poo, Daryl Krupa, 14:35
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 13:58
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 13:50
Re: John Harshman invites comment, VoiceOfReason, 13:34
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 12:18
Re: You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., T Wake, 12:17
Re: John Harshman invites comment, Desertphile, 12:07
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:58
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 11:24
John Harshman invites comment, don findlay, 11:18
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 10:08
Re: You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., Matt Silberstein, 09:49
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 09:39
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Jim Lillie, 09:20
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Jim Lillie, 09:11
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Jim Lillie, 09:06
Re: You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., T Wake, 08:23
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., T Wake, 08:21
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 06:37
Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:35
Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 06:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 05:29
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Aidan Karley, 03:07
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 02:53
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Jeff…Relf, 02:31
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, TCE, 02:26
You're more like a lit match than a monkey's uncle., Jeff…Relf, 02:14
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Shane, 01:57
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Jeff…Relf, 01:07
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jpopelish, 00:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 00:11
Re: Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Matt Silberstein, 00:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 00:02
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 00:02

June 05, 2006

Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 23:56
Locally, gravity was _Much_ stronger 13.7 billion years ago., Jeff…Relf, 23:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 23:40
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 23:34
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, George, 23:30
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 23:29
Lake Kivu methane, larsbell, 23:27
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 23:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 23:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, ray . tomes, 23:15
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 22:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 21:36
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Jo Schaper, 21:35
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Jo Schaper, 21:26
Re: table for geologic data, Jo Schaper, 21:24
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 20:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 19:55
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 19:05
Re: Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 18:38
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 18:36
Re: table for geologic data, Martin, 18:28
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Perplexed in Peoria, 18:27
Re: table for geologic data, Martin, 18:26
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:18
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:59
Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 17:56
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 17:37
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, George, 17:31
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 17:27
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jim Willemin, 16:54
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 15:47
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 15:03
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Earle Jones, 13:10
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Perplexed in Peoria, 12:55
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Perplexed in Peoria, 12:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, richard, 12:38
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 11:47
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Woland, 11:44
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Jim Lillie, 11:31
Re: subduction rate, rick++, 11:02
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 10:51
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Perplexed in Peoria, 10:38
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 09:48
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, jonathan, 09:26
Re: Nominative determinism, Jo Schaper, 08:18
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the, Robert J. Kolker, 07:27
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: 500 million year old poo, Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: Reading Recommendations, Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 06:03
Re: Nominative determinism, George, 05:26
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 05:21
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Richard Forrest, 04:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 04:36
Re: Reading Recommendations, Aidan Karley, 04:33
Nominative determinism, Aidan Karley, 04:33
Re: Entropy is stronger than gravity and is on course to win in the end., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 04:21
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 03:50

June 04, 2006

Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 19:14
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:41
Re: Reading Recommendations, Jo Schaper, 15:12
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, J. Taylor, 14:39
Re: table for geologic data, rick++, 14:36
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:09
Re: It is big- damned big, Aidan Karley, 14:00
Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Aidan Karley, 14:00
500 million year old poo, Aidan Karley, 14:00
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 14:00
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 14:00
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 14:00
Re: Reading Recommendations, mozart, 13:51
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 13:20
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 13:20
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 13:16
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Desertphile, 13:10
Re: Reading Recommendations, coastwatch, 13:03
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Popelish, 12:56
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, bullpup, 12:51
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 12:36
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 12:34
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 12:30
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, bullpup, 12:26
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 12:22
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 12:20
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 12:01
Re: subduction rate, will1, 11:55
Reading Recommendations, mozart, 11:45
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Mark Isaak, 11:32
Re: Volcano-like tremors detected deep within Earth's crust near San Andreas, Jim Lillie, 10:50
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Marc, 09:43
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, John Harshman, 09:38
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 08:46
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Dan Luke, 08:37
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 08:31
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, bullpup, 08:20
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 07:57
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 07:48
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Shane, 07:19
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Jonathan Silverlight, 06:00
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:54
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:34
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:12
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 04:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 03:56
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, Kermit, 02:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 02:17
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., will1, 01:59
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, bullpup, 01:10
Re: Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 00:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 00:53
Re: table for geologic data, don findlay, 00:50
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 00:47
Geological falsification - the summary position, don findlay, 00:47

June 03, 2006

Re: Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Jo Schaper, 23:23
Re: table for geologic data, Jo Schaper, 23:16
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Jo Schaper, 23:13
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 22:52
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 22:50
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 22:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 21:59
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:11
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:59
Re: table for geologic data, don findlay, 20:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:41
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:40
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 19:39
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:41
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:39
Re: table for geologic data, will1, 18:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:10
Re: table for geologic data, will1, 18:04
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:59
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:23
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:20
Re: For all you Yellowstone fans..., GoldMine, 16:52
Re: It is big- damned big, Charles, 14:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 14:26
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., will1, 14:02
Dendrochronology throws doubt on Colorado water use allocations, Aidan Karley, 13:27
Re: table for geologic data, Martin, 12:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 12:18
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 12:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 12:02
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 11:56
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 11:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:52
Re: subduction rate, George, 11:45
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 11:42
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 11:16
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 10:41
Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 09:43
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 09:43
Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 09:43
Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 09:43
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 09:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:40
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 06:19
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 06:07
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 06:01
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 05:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 05:15
Re: Zogby Poll Finds Over 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation, Charles, 04:20
Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 04:02
Re: subduction rate, George, 02:34
Re: For all you Yellowstone fans..., George, 02:22
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, don findlay, 02:01
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, don findlay, 01:59
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, don findlay, 01:53
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 01:47
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 01:47
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 01:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 01:31
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 01:06
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 00:59
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 00:55
Re: subduction rate, George, 00:50
Re: subduction rate, George, 00:47
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 00:45
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 00:44
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 00:42

June 02, 2006

Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 23:59
Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 23:58
Re: table for geologic data, will1, 23:35
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Flaugher, 22:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:41
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:03
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:02
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:02
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:01
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 21:01
table for geologic data, Martin, 20:52
Re: subduction rate, Jo Schaper, 20:17
For all you Yellowstone fans..., Jo Schaper, 19:58
Re: subduction rate, Eigenvector, 19:33
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Aidan Karley, 19:33
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 19:33
Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 19:33
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 19:32
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 19:32
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, ozbird, 18:47
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Aidan Karley, 18:39
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:05
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:54
Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 17:32
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 15:52
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., George, 15:45
Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 15:20
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 14:36
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Jo Schaper, 12:37
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Judd Vance, 12:30
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Jo Schaper, 12:28
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Judd Vance, 12:22
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 12:20
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Judd Vance, 12:07
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., SBC Yahoo, 11:43
Re: subduction rate, George, 11:23
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 11:18
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, rick++, 10:53
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., George, 10:44
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 10:36
Re: subduction rate, Kermit, 10:17
Re: BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, Aidan Karley, 09:50
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Jim Lillie, 09:29
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 08:43
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 08:26
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 08:09
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 06:53
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., don findlay, 05:11
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, George, 04:50
Re: Truth SeekersGetting Royal Screwing (w/o Vasoline) -- Man as Old as Coal -- Evolution Crap -- GAO, Steve, 04:37
Re: subduction rate, Aidan Karley, 04:36
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Aidan Karley, 04:36
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 04:36
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., George, 04:35
Re: subduction rate, Stuart, 04:30
BIG BANG IN ANTARCTICA -- KILLER CRATER FOUND UNDER ICE?, George, 02:58
Re: subduction rate, pete, 00:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 00:29
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 00:19
Re: subduction rate, Eigenvector, 00:00

June 01, 2006

Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 23:55
Re: A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., don findlay, 23:47
Re: subduction rate, John Harshman, 23:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:25
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Flaugher, 23:23
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:11
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:09
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 22:45
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:30
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:28
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:28
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:27
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 22:24
Re: subduction rate, John Harshman, 22:18
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:18
Jobs: US - Environmental / Geology Jobs, David R. Brierley, 21:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 21:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 21:13
Re: So how would you falsify it?, rich hammett, 21:07
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 21:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 20:50
A cute quiz for any pebble pups you know..., Jo Schaper, 20:48
Cute quiz for the pebble pups you know..., Jo Schaper, 20:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 20:44
Re: subduction rate, don findlay, 20:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 20:17
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 19:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 19:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 19:33
subduction rate, Eigenvector, 19:18
Re: Questions about K-T Impact Theory, SBC Yahoo, 19:00
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:45
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 18:26
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 18:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:47
Questions about K-T Impact Theory, Judd Vance, 17:26
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:20
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:04
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 16:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:48
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:30
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Kermit, 16:26
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 16:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 15:26
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 15:11
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 14:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 14:09
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 13:48
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 13:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 13:16
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 12:14
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:58
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 11:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 11:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 11:15
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 10:35
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 10:02
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 09:51
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:51
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:39
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Per1000IPDay2, 06:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 05:18
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 05:12
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 05:12
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Carsten Troelsgaard, 04:24
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, George, 04:09
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, George, 04:08
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, George, 04:07
Re: Sea surface altimetry So how would you falsify it?, Aidan Karley, 01:53
Re: Indonesian Earthquake Linked to SOLLOG aka the New Nostradamus, Aidan Karley, 01:53
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 01:53
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 01:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 01:41
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 00:55
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 00:46

May 31, 2006

Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:29
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 23:24
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 22:25
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 22:07
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:32
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:32
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 21:32
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, GeoGeorge1, 21:30
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 20:48
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:32
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 19:31
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 19:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:20
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 18:13
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 17:47
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:37
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:21
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 17:16
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 17:13
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:04
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:53
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 16:49
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 16:39
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Stuart, 16:35
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:34
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, John Curtis, 16:18
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 16:15
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 15:27
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 15:07
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 14:51
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:09
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 14:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 13:50
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 13:15
Re: Sea surface altimetry Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 12:55
Re: Sea surface altimetry Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert J. Kolker, 12:52
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Mark Isaak, 12:51
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ken Shackleton, 12:50
Center deteriorating at Dinosaur monument, ishky, 12:34
Re: Sea surface altimetry Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 12:04
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 11:58
Re: Sea surface altimetry Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 10:59
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 10:59
Sea surface altimetry Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 10:46
Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 10:22
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 09:57
Re: So how would you falsify it?, jack2004fb, 09:20
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, GeoGeorge, 09:05
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Augray, 08:44
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:48
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 07:33
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 06:59
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 06:43
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 06:42
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 06:42
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 05:48
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 05:48
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 05:48
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, George, 02:55
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 02:44
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, George, 02:41
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Eigenvector, 00:30
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Eigenvector, 00:22
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Belba Grubb, 00:20
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 00:04

May 30, 2006

Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Jo Schaper, 23:15
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Eigenvector, 22:01
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 21:11
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Jo Schaper, 21:01
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Belba Grubb, 20:28
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Jo Schaper, 19:03
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:58
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Jo Schaper, 18:49
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 17:56
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:19
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 17:14
Re: Let's make this really, really, really simple, rich hammett, 16:21
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 16:18
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Aidan Karley, 16:18
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red -Whoops sorry...., Aidan Karley, 16:18
Re: Let's make this really, really, really simple, rich hammett, 16:16
GIANT FOSSILIZED MAN FOUND DEEP INSIDE COAL MINE, edconrad, 15:55
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 15:49
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Jonathan Silverlight, 15:44
My apology to the Scots!, raccoonspace@xxxxxxxxx, 13:17
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 12:56
Re: Southern California Earthquake Center Models" Big Quake", rick++, 12:06
Re: So how would you falsify it?, rick++, 12:00
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 11:02
Re: So how would you falsify it?, J. Taylor, 10:54
Re: Volcano lake turns from blue to red, Jo Schaper, 10:45
Re: questions for the bored., don findlay, 09:36
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 09:31
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Augray, 08:49
Re: So how would you falsify it?, don findlay, 08:29

May 27, 2006

Re: So how would you falsify it?, jonathan, 03:15