|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:575fv19al43irtc7fingp2dcvnqkp4gc61@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:36:09 +1100, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Carole"
> <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Skywise" <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >news:11vavtdh8bapq55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> "Carole" <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:43f5635d$0$17080$5a62ac22
> >> @per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:
> >>
> >> > There is a patent which probably proves scientifically that the earth
is
> >> > hollow.
> >> > US Patent 1096102: The Hollow Earth Theory
> >>
> >> I just downloaded the patent, which was granted in 1914.
> >>
> >> That patent is for a globe of a hollow earth designed and decorated
> >> "according to the theory of the inventor" that opens up on hinges
> >> and has a light bulb in the center.
> >>
> >> Since you cannot patent a theory, he patented the physical design
> >> of a globe with a light bulb in it and the ornamental design of said
> >> globe.
> >>
> >> This patent probably would never be granted today. It likely could
> >> be contested in a court of law to be false and unenforceable. I
> >> would argue the device is not useful. What use is a hollow globe
> >> with a light bulb inside? Besides, it is obvious the design is
> >> meant to circumvent patent laws against patenting a theory.
> >>
> >> Most assuredly, the patent contains NOTHING to describe nor support
> >> any thoery of any kind, whatsoever.
> >>
> >> Brian
> >> --
> >> http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
> >> Seismic FAQ: www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html">http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
> >> Quake "predictions": www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html">http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
> >> Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
> >
> >According to the article, the hollow earth theory is "highly classified".
> >So you either didn't download it, or it has been sanitised or edited to
take
> >out any meaningful information.
> >
> >United States Patent 1096102:
> >The Hollow Earth Theory
> >by Mark Harp
> > www.davidicke.net/mysteries/hollow/patent.html">http://www.davidicke.net/mysteries/hollow/patent.html
>
> Icke is not a reliable source...
Icke didn't write the article. The article talks about a couple of books,
one covers the topic more comprehensively than the other.
>
> > www.hiddenmysteries.com">http://www.hiddenmysteries.com
> >"For reasons which even Mr. Gardner could not have fully anticipated in
the
> >early 1900s, and which are now abundantly clear, his discovery soon
became
> >the most highly classified military secret of all time."
> >
> >Do you know what "highly classified" means?
>
> I do.
>
> <One of my many jobs while in the service of governments military was
> to track and keep up to date the various and many classified pubs and
> daily handling of Classified materials. I was also trained into how
> to dispose of said documents and publications, and classified
> materials and equipment. Training with thermite and its many related
> exothermic products is so much fun to play with and even more so
> inside a metal hull.>
>
> Do you?
> it means nothing in this case... classified material didn't exist
> until the start or middle of WW1. If it was classified no patent
> would have been issued...
I wondered about that.
It also matches up with something I read from a book called 'Pentagon
Aliens" by William Lyne, who says -
"Patent applications are like ripe plums to the elite, all for the picking.
Any significant energy, transportation or manufacturing breakthrough
automatically becomes a national security secret, which allows the
government to remove all evidence of a patent application, to confiscate the
invention, and to prohibit disclosures to the public under the secrecy acts.
After confiscation, the work is then turned over to the usual
corporate-state companies, so they can manufacture secret equipment to be
sold to the government at huge profit."
>
> >You do realise that the government for various reasons, classifies
> >everything and anything that they don't want people to know about, and
> >whether the people have a right to know is irrelevant?
>
> I don't know that. The government has no control over private
> industry research. If the government had such control, they wouldn't
> allow private research by any US corporation. and then there is the
> problem of Multinational Corporations.
>
> Most all research done today is segmented. No one except a few people
> at the top actually know where the pure research projects are going.
>
> As a Geology student... I know there earth isn't hollow... the Data
> from P-waves from Earthquakes show it isn't... Also the data from
> orbital satellites, The gravity <mass attractions> measurements have
> figured the mass of the earth very closely.
>
> Data in existence doesn't support the concept of a Hollow Earth.
OK but on the other hand, I don't really think a lot of scientific
calculations are very reliable.
I just don't believe that the sciences are all they're cracked up to be. eg,
There is a website called
The scandal of general relativity and quantum mechanics
Roger Anderton
www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk/articlefour/a9.htm">http://www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk/articlefour/a9.htm
which goes into some anomalies and inconsistencies in the theories that
shows physics up as a farce.
>
> >Or maybe you are one of those good little mind controlled drones who
trusts
> >the government and they wouldn't do anything against the people's
interests.
>
> You know bRay?
Carole
www.conspiracee.com">http://www.conspiracee.com
|
|