| Subject: | Re: 'Fossils for sale' seized in US |
|---|---|
| From: | "=?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=" <> |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:28:36 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.geo.geology |
Alan Johnson wrote: > > Evenin' all. What's general opinion on this kind of thing? Naughty, > don't care, good for business and punters? > > "US customs agents say they have seized eight tonnes of prehistoric > fossils - including dinosaur eggs - which they suspect were smuggled > from Argentina. There is no easy answer Alan. IMO, it depends on the fossil. Where I grew up the limestone gravel used in driveways was full of Devonian Mucrospirifer prolificus fossils. Those I would not mind selling to the public. Dino eggs and T-Rex legs are different. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 'Fossils for sale' seized in US, don findlay |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 'Fossils for sale' seized in US, Carsten Troelsgaard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 'Fossils for sale' seized in US, don findlay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 'Fossils for sale' seized in US, Carsten Troelsgaard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |