sci.energy.hydrogen (date)

sci.energy.hydrogen (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 30, 2005

Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Al, 06:43

August 29, 2005

Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Al, 19:46

August 28, 2005

Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Al, 11:29

August 27, 2005

Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Steve Spence, 19:33
Re: posting 20050827, hhc314, 14:22
Re: Profitable Solar Power - A suggestion, G. R. L. Cowan, 11:47
posting 20050827, cassivellaunus_v, 11:16

August 26, 2005

Re: Profitable Solar Power - A suggestion, hhc314, 21:44
Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Al, 20:24
Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, fkasner, 18:54
Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, knews4u2chew, 17:54
Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, jedcheck, 14:01
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 12:09
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 10:49
Re: Cheap Power, mike mcwilliams, 10:09
Profitable Solar Power - A suggestion, dreams2text, 07:47

August 25, 2005

Re: electrolysis efficiency?, hhc314, 20:23
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, hhc314, 20:16
Re: Cheap Power, Bill Ward, 19:10
Re: Cheap Power, Dan Bloomquist, 18:34
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 17:46
Re: Cheap Power, mike mcwilliams, 16:15
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 16:10
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 16:02
Re: Cheap Power, mike mcwilliams, 15:02
Re: Cheap Power, Dan Bloomquist, 13:08
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 11:47
Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 07:00
Re: Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, Saint-Hilaire, 05:45

August 24, 2005

Re: Cheap Power, Bret Ludwig, 19:52
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Dan Bloomquist, 17:38
Re: Cheap Power, Don W., 16:52
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Don W., 16:28
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Dan Bloomquist, 16:03
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, BobG, 15:26
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Don Lancaster, 15:11
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, BobG, 15:07
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, BobG, 14:56
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Dan Bloomquist, 14:25
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Don Lancaster, 14:16
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Don Lancaster, 14:14
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Dan Bloomquist, 14:14
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, BobG, 13:52
Re: electrolysis efficiency?, Don Lancaster, 12:32
electrolysis efficiency?, BobG, 12:17
Re: Cheap Power, BobG, 12:06
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 11:59
Re: Cheap Power, Randy, 11:50
Re: Cheap Power, Paul Vader, 11:17
Re: Cheap Power, Don Lancaster, 01:46
Re: Cheap Power, Randy, 00:48

August 23, 2005

Re: Cheap Power, BobG, 23:23
Cheap Power, Randy, 22:19
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Bret Ludwig, 14:56
Re: High pressure positive displacement pumps, Don Lancaster, 11:40
Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Phillip G., 11:01
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Paul Vader, 10:56
High pressure positive displacement pumps, H2_investigator, 10:12
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 06:44
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 02:37
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 02:32
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 01:03
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, BobG, 00:17
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Don Lancaster, 00:16
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 00:10

August 22, 2005

Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Bret Ludwig, 23:50
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Bret Ludwig, 23:46
Re: Paul Pantone Incarcerated, hhc314, 23:42
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Don Lancaster, 23:41
Re: Briggs and Stratton cheapness, hhc314, 23:38
Briggs and Stratton cheapness, Bret Ludwig, 23:19
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), Bret Ludwig, 22:53
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 15:59
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 14:16
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Charlie Edmondson, 13:15
Re: Cars that run on water?, Into the living sea of waking dreams, 11:16
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 09:14
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 08:58
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Steve Spence, 08:29
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 08:14
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 08:10
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 07:55
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 01:06
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 01:04

August 21, 2005

Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Alan, 21:46
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 17:53
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Bill Ward, 15:34
Paul Pantone Incarcerated, Al, 15:20
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 14:06
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 13:35
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don Lancaster, 13:07
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 12:20
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 12:15
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 11:23
Re: Internship wanted, Seiji, 03:03
Re: Internship wanted, Seiji, 03:01

August 20, 2005

Re: Internship wanted, hhc314, 23:42
Internship wanted, Seiji, 14:39
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 12:38
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Don W., 12:36
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 12:29
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 12:05
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 11:55
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 10:40
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 10:32
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 10:27
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 10:03
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 08:38
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 03:13
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 03:07
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 03:06
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 03:06

August 19, 2005

Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 19:43
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Charlie Edmondson, 18:53
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 16:02
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), The Phantom, 15:19
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), The Phantom, 15:06
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Alan, 13:58
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), Dan Bloomquist, 13:29
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), Paul Vader, 11:08
Re: We need a cute name for this deficiency (somewhat OT), BobG, 08:54
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 07:23
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Marc, 07:21
Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS, Al, 06:43

August 12, 2005

Re: Cars that run on water?, Tony Wesley, 11:48
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don Lancaster, 11:11
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 11:06
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 11:06
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 11:06
Re: Cars that run on water?, Paul Vader, 11:00
Re: Cars that run on water?, Paul Vader, 10:55
Re: Cars that run on water?, Paul Vader, 10:53
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 09:55
Re: Air compressor/pump, Don Lancaster, 09:30
World's Largest Solar Array to use Stirling Engine, raffaele.castagno@xxxxxxxxx, 06:50
Air compressor/pump, Piter, 04:25

August 11, 2005

Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, hhc314, 22:57
Re: Tomorrow: countries exporters of hydrogen!, hhc314, 22:48
Re: Tomorrow: countries exporters of hydrogen!, hhc314, 22:48
Re: Cars that run on water?, Dan Bloomquist, 22:14
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 20:43
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 20:42
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don Lancaster, 20:41
Re: Cars that run on water?, Bill Ward, 19:37
Tomorrow: countries exporters of hydrogen!, Dale Evans, 19:27
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 18:43
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 18:26
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 18:21
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 18:07
Re: Great Thread Redux, fkasner, 18:02
Re: Cars that run on water?, G. R. L. Cowan, 17:54
Re: be sure not to fall into the alcohol for fuel trap. geo/solar/hydrogen is mo betta because it doesn't reduce soil fertility., Bret Ludwig, 16:33
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don W., 15:21
Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Angelo Campanella, 15:19
Re: Cars that run on water?, Dan Bloomquist, 15:08
Re: Cars that run on water?, Dan Bloomquist, 15:08
Re: Cars that run on water?, G. R. L. Cowan, 14:56
Re: Cars that run on water?, Bill Ward, 14:31
Re: Cars that run on water?, Into the living sea of waking dreams, 14:30
Re: Cars that run on water?, G. R. L. Cowan, 13:27
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don Lancaster, 13:26
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 13:24
Re: Cars that run on water?, Dan Bloomquist, 13:11
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 13:01
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 12:40
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 12:39
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 12:38
Re: Cars that run on water?, Paul Vader, 10:56
Re: Cars that run on water?, Paul Vader, 10:54
Re: Suck Eggs, Doubters!, Don Lancaster, 10:06
Re: Suck Eggs, Doubters!, Don W., 04:43
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don W., 04:37
Re: Cars that run on water?, Don W., 04:33
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 02:57
Re: Cars that run on water?, Peter Lowrie, 01:34
Suck Eggs, Doubters!, Peter Lowrie, 01:26

August 10, 2005

Re: Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, Saint-Hilaire, 16:35
Re: be sure not to fall into the alcohol for fuel trap. geo/solar/hydrogen is mo betta because it doesn't reduce soil fertility., Don Lancaster, 12:15
Re: Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, "Ivar S. Ertesvåg", 11:58
Re: be sure not to fall into the alcohol for fuel trap. geo/solar/hydrogen is mo betta because it doesn't reduce soil fertility., Ed Earl Ross, 11:57
Re: Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, z, 10:45

August 09, 2005

Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Ed Earl Ross, 23:34
Re: Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, Rodney, 23:08
Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Bob Eldred, 20:55
Quasiturbine - Pipeline Pressure Energy?, Saint-Hilaire, 17:35
Re: No comment necessary..., Don Lancaster, 12:31
Re: No comment necessary..., Into the living sea of waking dreams, 12:14
Re: No comment necessary..., hhc314, 10:16
Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 07:11
Re: No comment necessary..., Don W., 02:12
Re: No comment necessary..., Don Lancaster, 02:10
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, ldapchap-newsrap, 01:44
Re: No comment necessary..., Don Lancaster, 01:03
Re: No comment necessary..., The Phantom, 00:28

August 08, 2005

Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 18:17
Re: Great Thread Redux, K. Jones, 16:44
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 16:25
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 16:23
No comment necessary..., Don W., 13:50
Re: No comment necessary..., Don Lancaster, 13:47

August 07, 2005

Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Don W., 18:19
Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Phillip G., 16:35
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 05:16

August 06, 2005

Re: SHEC Labs Apology to Marc Dannenberg, Bill Ward, 19:00
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Al, 16:59
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 16:03
Re: SHEC Labs Apology to Marc Dannenberg, Marc, 15:58
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Marc, 10:47
Re: Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, me, 10:20
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, K. Jones, 09:11
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Al, 08:25
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 07:37
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Al, 06:57
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 05:55
Al, your mother wishes you were a loser like me, Marc, 05:52
Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Marc, 05:50

August 05, 2005

Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 21:18
Marc Jason Dannenberg is a Total Loser, Al, 19:51
Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 19:43
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 19:38
Hydrogen Outlook in Physics Today December 2004, Angelo Campanella, 19:36
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 19:36
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 16:15
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 16:10
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Marc, 13:37
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Don W., 12:31
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Angelo Campanella, 12:27
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Nem, 10:59
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Marc, 09:03

August 04, 2005

Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Don W., 18:27
Re: Great Thread Redux, fkasner, 17:56
Re: Great Thread Redux, fkasner, 17:55
Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 14:39
Re: hooo boy..., G. R. L. Cowan, 11:44
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Bill Ward, 11:05
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Dan Bloomquist, 10:59
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Alex Terrell, 10:39
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Marc, 10:20
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Don Lancaster, 10:20
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Bill Ward, 09:55
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, cyril, 08:09
Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Al, 07:31
The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider, Marc, 01:50

August 03, 2005

Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 20:45
Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 20:10
Re: hooo boy..., G. R. L. Cowan, 19:03
Re: hooo boy..., Don Lancaster, 17:55
Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 17:20
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 14:56
Re: hooo boy..., Don Lancaster, 14:43
Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 14:22
Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 14:17
Re: hooo boy..., Don Lancaster, 14:14
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Dan Bloomquist, 14:03
Re: hooo boy..., The Phantom, 13:34
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Bob Eldred, 11:20
Re: improved method unveiled., Mike McWilliams, 10:15
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Mike McWilliams, 10:09
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 09:43
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 09:34
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Alex Terrell, 05:58

August 02, 2005

Re: an improved method of electrolysis, K. Jones, 23:06
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross, 21:54
Re: improved method unveiled., Dan Bloomquist, 21:01
Re: improved method unveiled., Don Lancaster, 20:07
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, daestrom, 18:58
Re: improved method unveiled., Don Lancaster, 18:06
Re: improved method unveiled., Don Lancaster, 18:04
Re: improved method unveiled., Mike McWilliams, 17:53
Re: improved method unveiled., Dan Bloomquist, 17:26
improved method unveiled., Mike McWilliams, 16:53
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Mike McWilliams, 16:41
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don W., 15:45
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Dan Bloomquist, 15:23
THE BEST BIOFUELS ARE COST EFFECTIVE, Angelo Campanella, 14:48
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 13:55
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Mike McWilliams, 13:30
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 12:31
Re: Great Thread Redux, Bill Ward, 12:15
Re: global Photonics, Mike McWilliams, 12:09
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 11:59
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 11:58
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Mike McWilliams, 11:56
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 10:20
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Don Lancaster, 10:15
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 10:12
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, cyril, 08:49
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Al, 07:11
Re: Great Thread Redux, Bill Ward, 00:45

August 01, 2005

Re: an improved method of electrolysis, K. Jones, 21:39
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, daestrom, 21:20
Re: Great Thread Redux, Don Lancaster, 18:07
Re: Great Thread Redux, Al, 17:37
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, knews4u2chew, 17:17
Re: Great Thread Redux, knews4u2chew, 17:13
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, cyril, 08:15
Re: hooo boy..., Angelo Campanella, 01:30

July 31, 2005

Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Dan Bloomquist, 22:43
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, quibbler, 22:20
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Al, 16:25
Re: hooo boy..., Don Lancaster, 13:51
Re: hooo boy..., Don Lancaster, 13:38
Re: hooo boy..., Dan Bloomquist, 13:07
Re: hooo boy..., Angelo Campanella, 12:58
Re: hooo boy..., Angelo Campanella, 12:43
Re: SHEC Labs Apology to Marc Dannenberg, Al, 11:46
Re: Once again SHEC Labs is scamming, Al, 09:52
Re: an improved method of electrolysis, Dan Bloomquist, 02:17

July 30, 2005

Re: an improved method of electrolysis, cyril, 19:40
Re: Great Thread Redux, fkasner, 18:14