|
|
"Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122157333.859707.299060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Most people are alarmists, and see things soley through their own eyes
> with their pre determined opinions blocking out the truth. That is
> most true of this useless group of "scientists" and "educated" folks.
> I dread what the future holds if you people are the minds of science.
> You can all kiss my big hairy ass. By the way if the jerkoff who
> slandered me comes forward and grows a cock, I will have you arrested
> before you can say Great White North.
>
> Mr. Dannenberg,
>
>
> This communication should clarify the email that I wrote in confidence
> to Don Lancaster who has posted many of his views on the
> Sci.energy.hydrogen forum on the internet. I respect Mr. Lancaster for
>
> his knowledge and as I have stated that reference material from his
> publications were used in the design process of the electronic control
> systems used by SHEC-Labs has developed is propretary and if
> individuals wish to learn more of the intricate workings or "numbers"
> of our technology, a notarizd "Non Discloser Agreement" (sic) would
> need to be put in place. I assure you, as validations and feasibility
> studies have suggested, the science is innovative and complies with all
>
> rules of Physics.
>
>
> I have discussed my past email communication that was sent to Mr.
> Lancaster with the management at SHEC-Labs and have been told that you
> had at no time suggested an increase in your rate of commission, you
> have suggested that SHEC-Labs give you 150,000 shares of our stock at
> no charge for your past efforts and that you have in fact decided to
> reduce your rate to 10 percent if you were able to raise more funds.
>
>
> With respect to the 33.750 USD that was to be directed to SHEC-Labs and
>
> SHEC-Labs never received, Mr Dannenberg apparently you were asked
> several times to send confirmation that the funds had been returned to
> the original owner and eventually you did fax SHEC-Labs communication
> that on March 1, 2005 funds had been returned via wire transfer.....
>
>
> I should also correct another statement. "The postings of this obvious
>
> crook reflect badly on the hard work of SHEC's staff" I should not
> have suggested that you Mr. Dannenberg area crook. (no shit)
>
>
> Blah, Blah, it goes on to say how hard SHEC works and how they are not
> a scam.
>
> I asked for 150,000 free shares for my clients who paid 2 USD per share
> when they should have been paying 82.5 cents per fucking share.
>
> I will accept all apologies. For smart people, you sure are stupid.
>
>
> It's not your fault though. It's your parents fault.
What the hell is this nonsensical garbage? And, what does it have to do with
anything? If anybody has been wronged, take it to court. That's what courts
are for.
|
|