|
|
"Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121599560.093950.82910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snipped useless crap that has already been discussed>
Cost analyses
Cost analyses and models have been prepared based on the use of the
various feed gases (i.e. landfill gas, natural gas, flare gas, etc.)
and based on empirical data for the cost of the demonstration unit,
current gas production, and current size of the solar array. The cost
analyses show that the hydrogen production costs based on using
landfill gas are lower than traditional hydrogen production methods
that use natural gas. It is important to note that the overall cost
competitiveness of hydrogen extends beyond hydrogen production to
hydrogen compression, storage, and distribution. The cost models are
currently being expanded to include these elements and involve some
innovative hydrogen distribution cost savings.
Don did you mention the cost analysis??? It's right on the link I
originally shared with you half-wits. Amazing, simply amazing. Why
the fuck should any company share detailed information with you GEEKS
from GEEKNET? You are now officially branded a big mouthed loser who's
only purpose is to speculate on ideas they can't comprehend or simply
do not know anything about. All of you have the research skills of my
asshole.
Is *THAT* your idea of a "cost analysis"??? A statement that one has been
done?
As Bugs Bunny would say......."What a maroon"!
Mr. Big-bucks wanna-be can't even pay his fine.....
Go fetch Marco.........roll over......good boy!
K. Jones
a.k.a. "K-Dog"
|
|