|
|
Marc wrote:
Don,
This is the procedure well known scientists have drawn out. Let's see
i have confirmation that it works from some pro's and a geek usenet
anonymous forum that says it doesn't. Hmmmmm, who am I going to go
Marc, you forgot to include the savvy UK gardeners who weren't
hoodwinked by you either. They had almost the exact same arguments as
seen here, but they got rid of you a lot sooner. I suggest you find an
even easier crowd to sell this to. Perhaps the dementia unit at your
local hospital and old folks homes.
with, a country that is putting out 16 million dollars or a Usenet Geek
who is bashing what they do not know. I think the winner is clear. I
know how to make money and no matter how you downplay that, it is more
important for sure than what you do. Anyway, Don W, we will see if the
Geek wannabees are right or if the Financial Gurus are right. By
If by right you mean you get to make money while other people lose
theirs... I guess the financial gurus will win this one. In less
civilized countries it's called stealing, and some people get their
hands cut off.
saying I don't know what I am talking about, you are also saying SHEC
doesn't know what they are talking about. It's quite possible I'm
saying the wrong things, but way back when, I asked all of you to call
SHEC with questions. You people are dense.
By Carbon you rigid moron, I meant Carbon Dioxide, and it can be made
into food grade CO2. Let me ask you something Donnie, have you ever
turned 2 million into 20 million??? Ok, shut the fuck up then, listen
and learn something valuable.
and you were the one arguing that they ought to devalue their stock...
Was that so it would be easier to sell to more chumps? or did you have a
moment of clarity way back when, and figured out that they were valuing
their sweat money a little too high, and that this was something to be
concerned with?
|
|