Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective

Subject:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective
From:	"DE Pauley"
Date:	25 Jul 2005 15:22:02 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.energy.hydrogen

Not likely. Except they do not include federal land and forest land. If
theses lands were cleared for crops where feasible there might be a 50%
increase. I have no sources on this, but much forest and federal is not
suitable for crops.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, (continued) Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, G. R. L. Cowan Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley <= Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross

Previous by Date:	Re: Hydrogen IS fuel, Don Lancaster
Next by Date:	Re: Another flock of 'em just flew over..., Angelo Campanella
Previous by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG
Next by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]