Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective

Subject:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective
From:	"BobG"
Date:	25 Jul 2005 11:33:22 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.energy.hydrogen

Does anyone know how the CIA factbook comes up with 19% arable land?
Whats the criterion? Does it have to be relatively level? Have some
topsoil? Even elimination of HALF of the imported foreign oil with
biodiesel is a win, right? Also, it looks like sunflowers and rapeseed
have more oil yield per acre than soybeans. Also... have we heard from
any bioengineering types that think an oilier sunflower could be bred?
Double the oil on half the land and Bob's Your Uncle.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, (continued) Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Charlie Edmondson Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, G. R. L. Cowan Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG <= Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross

Previous by Date:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley
Next by Date:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley
Previous by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley
Next by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]