Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective

Subject:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective
From:	"DE Pauley"
Date:	25 Jul 2005 10:38:06 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.energy.hydrogen

But ethanol or methanol (about 10%) is still needed. Can it be produced
from the alga residual after the oil is extracted?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, (continued) Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Mike McWilliams Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Charlie Edmondson Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, G. R. L. Cowan Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley <= Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross

Previous by Date:	Re: Another flock of 'em just flew over..., Don Lancaster
Next by Date:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG
Previous by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross
Next by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]