Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective

Subject:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective
From:	"BobG"
Date:	19 Jul 2005 10:48:49 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.energy.hydrogen

This is exciting Ed. Two people have come up with the same 10-11% land
area needed for total transportaion fuel independence using two
differing estimation methods... gallons per acre and BTUs per acre.
This makes it seem very feasible to this engineer.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, The Phantom Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, BobG <= Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Bob Eldred Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Morgan Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Bob Eldred Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Mike McWilliams Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Don Lancaster Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Charlie Edmondson Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, DE Pauley Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, G. R. L. Cowan

Previous by Date:	Re: Marc Jason Dannenberg....small time crook, Marc
Next by Date:	Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous..., BobG
Previous by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Ed Earl Ross
Next by Thread:	Re: Even the best biofuels aren't cost effective, Bob Eldred
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]