Don Lancaster wrote:
Bob Eldred wrote:
I don't by that. I think you are right that is the implication but it
makes
little sense. It's basically saying that even with all of the solar
input it
still takes more energy to produce than you get out. Why should that be?
Bob
For obvious openers, diesel fuel, electricity, and crop loans.
Ethanol from corn under US farm conditions makes no sense whatsoever.
It is simply a twelve billion dollar vote buying scam.
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf
Oops.
Should have said "Ethanol for energy uses from corn under..."
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@xxxxxxxxxx
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at www.tinaja.com">http://www.tinaja.com
|