Re: Hydrogen IS fuel

[Clint Olsen]

On 2005-07-16, charliew2 <charliew2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, use your own money to generate hydrogen and get back to the NG with
> the results. 

Again, the definition has nothing to do with economic viability.  And just
because we're splitting hairs on the definition doesn't mean that I think
hydrogen is fiscally sound.  Fuel by definition just has to be something to
burn.  It doesn't have to be cost effective.

-Clint
-- 
Clint Olsen                                                        . -- .  
clint at NULlsen dot net                                         .'  ,-. `.
                                                                 ;_,' (   ;
"These go to eleven."                                            `.    ``;'
        -- Nigel Tufnel                                            ` -- '