|
|
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:12:42 -0700, "Don W."
<dNOSPAMwiddersAThotmail.com> wrote:
>"Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1121521019.645258.204640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Al, I wish that were true. Nobody called me out on
>> anything because nobody has any knowledge of the
>> scientific matter regarding SHEC Labs technology.
>> I have to say, you are retarded. Why in Gods name
>> would geeknet posters like Don and Dan and K ask
>> about the technology and request further information
>> iif they felt they "called me on it" . As a matter of
>> fact, and this goes most of all for you, I have seen no
>> evidence of any type of understanding, scientific or
>> otherwise.
>
>You suggested that carbon from the methane would be "made into food grade
>and sold." When I questioned how this would be accomplished, you answered
>"Water Gas Shift Reactor, you numbnut." At that point I 'called you on
>it'! You've presented "no evidence of any type of understanding,
>scientific or otherwise." When your responses are BS, others could respond
>by saying "your responses are BS" or they could respond by asking questions
>and offering a chance for you to clean up the BS. So far you've chosen to
>leave all the BS and when it's found to be BS you point to the SHEC Labs
>website. Maybe Tom Beck will send a scientist here to 'clean up' after
>you.
>
>
>> What I do see are blatant fools who stick to their
>> "world is flat" methodology and are too lazy and
>> or incompetent and or plain out dumb to prove
>> themselves right or wrong. SHEC Labs technology
>> has been validated, and that wasn't good enough
>> for K-dog. Al, you know what you dumbkoff, I
>> will agree. The Geeknet losers are right and
>> Canada, APS, Giffels, Hydrogenics, U of T, US
>> AID, Mexico, the US, and 13 other countries are
>> wrong. This will never work. Boooohooooo.
>> Guess what Al old boy, you still are worthless,
>> and I can afford to lose every dime I have on SHEC
>> Labs.
>>
>> As most know, that is not the case of course as
>> is the result of "big Al"'s rantings. SHEC is poised
>> to be a multibillion dollar company in the area of
>> hydrogen production where hydrogen is used
>> presently or in the future.
>>
>
>When you refer to "most", to whom are you refering? It would appear you
>haven't found anyone anywhere friendly to your posts. What are you trying
>to accomplish, Marc?
Perhaps he's getting paid by the number of responses to his
posts.
Regards,
Bill Ward
>Is this what you call success?
>
>Don W.
>
>
|
|