sci.energy.hydrogen
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sci.Energy Geeks, take a look

Subject: Re: Sci.Energy Geeks, take a look
From: "Don W." <dNOSPAMwiddersAThotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:00:16 -0700
Newsgroups: sci.energy.hydrogen
"Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121539377.763607.306550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Don,
>
> This is absolutely insane.  There cannot be this many people in one
> interest group with nothing going on upstairs.   I don't know what a
> water gas shift reactor is, I've never heard of a water gas shift
> reactor before SHEC used it, but YOU should.  If we are talking about
> reformation of methane to hydrogen using Solar Concentrators while
> sequestering the Carbon Dioxide to sell it for whatever reason, NOT
> JUST FOOD GRADE you imbeciles,

You've never indicated how the carbon dioxide is sequestered.

"Peter Lowrie" wrote in message news:1980753.s2YCxOToIj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that reformation of methane into hydrogen is "dirty" because the
"by-product is carbon".

"Marc" wrote in message
news:1121442445.616794.61300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"The carbon gets made into food grade and sold."

When I suggested that making carbon into food grade and selling it doesn't
seem any more feasible than making it into diamonds and selling them, you
responded in message
news:1121454400.604930.276620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Water Gas Shift Reactor, you numbnut."

NEWS FLASH FOR MARC:
Water gas shift reactors neither turn carbon into food grade nor do they
sell the carbon.

If you're trying to say that the carbon dioxide is sold for soda pop, that
certainly doesn't keep it out of the atmosphere now, does it?


> and SHEC Is using a water gas shift
> reactor, shouldn't ANY of you LIGHTBULBS know ANY of the ways this
> could be done????

Water gas shift reactors perform the secondary step in reforming methane
for hydrogen (reacting CO with H2O to produce H2 and CO2.)  They don't
sequester the CO2.  Nothing new here -- only verification once again that
you have no clue what you're going on about.

> I am in finance, I am not a scientist and since I've
> talked to APS, Hydrogenics and other scientists over the past 2 years
> and they have confirmed to me it is viable,

What are you saying is viable, that carbon can be "made into food grade" in
a water gas shift reactor?  That a water gas shift reactor can sequester
CO2?  You make idiotic statements, call others idiots and then hide behind
"I am in finance, I am not a scientist."  Wherever did you get the idea
that you're a genius?


> It is a real deep mystery
> how anybody here can call themselves successful IF THEY HAVE NO IDEA
> WHAT THE HELL I'M TALKING ABOUT.  Wake up people.

Hmmmm... you've already admitted that even YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE HELL
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.  Wake up Marc!

Don W.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy