sci.electronics.basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Relation

Subject: Re: Relation
From: Alan B
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 06:35:22 -0700
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:50:05 GMT, in message
<1oHAg.7829$gF6.3061@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<tapwater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> scribed:

>I kinda like this answer, especially the note on the bottom. The term Q in
>the equation seems to relate the speed to the type of material.

The speed of what, exactly?


> BTW light
>doesn't travel at the speed of light (in a vacuum) when it encounters a
>"transparent" material. This is for any of you dorks who were going to try
>to tell me that electricity travels at the speed of light.

Who, precisely please, in this forum, ever said such a thing?


>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Posted by killians45 on 01-26-2005 05:44 PM:
>
>actually, I am as fast as the speed of light... maybe a little faster...
>anyhow, back to the question. Electric current is slow moving and actually
>almost sits there and vibrates (thus exciting from one electron to the
>other). Energy flow, on the other hand, is very fast (and yes, there IS a
>difference). To say how fast is rather hard, because the speed of the energy
>flow is related to the value of the current... small current = low speed
>energy flow and vice-a-versa. That's just one thing that affects the speed.
>The size of the wire (listed above) also does. To find out the speed have to
>know the amperes, wire diameter/radius, and how many moving electrons per
>cubic centimeter. Once you have this the formula is:
>
>I = amperes
>D = wire diameter
>Q= moving electrons per cubic centimeter
>e = charge per electron
>
>cm/sec = I / Q x e x R ^2 x pi
>
>this is for DC

Did you read this quoted passage?


>-- 
>If you argue with an idiot he will drag you down to his level and beat you
>with experience.

This part of the quote is probably the most apropos statement with regards
to follows-up to your posts.


><tapwater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:LBEAg.7751$gF6.5968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Do you remember the speed of electricity in copper? Was it 1/2 light
>speed?

OK, I've asked three simple questions.  Do you have what it takes to simply
answer them, without the troll's recourse to obfuscation, misdirection, and
insult?  I bet not.  After all, you're still unable to stop top-posting.
It's such a simple thing, really, yet you're not able to grasp the concept.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>