sci.electronics.basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How to stop Piracy?

Subject: Re: How to stop Piracy?
From:
Date: 26 Apr 2006 06:52:50 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.electronics, sci.electronics.basics, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc
John Fields wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2006 02:19:27 -0700, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> >Thanks John for your responses to these perhaps radical ideas.
>
> ---
> They're not radical at all, they're embodied in the philosophies of
> communism and socialism.
> ---

OK, so communism and socialism suggest that the means of prouction
should not be controlled by a central government?  That's news to me..



>
> >One more comment:
> >
> >Under IP laws, an idea does not belong to its originator, but belongs
> >to whoever is favored by (who has paid) the governors.
>
> ---
> That's not true.  The idea belongs to the originator until he
> assigns it to someone else.
> ---

It belongs to the patent holder under current laws.

>
>
> > The originator,
> >other people who came up with it (what idea has ever been had by only a
> >single person?), those who appreciate the work and would build on it,
> >and those who could use the idea to better the economy, are out of
> >luck, at least in the lands under power of the crown - I mean the
> >forementioned governernors.
>
> ---
> That's all hogwash.
>
> In the case of simultaneous invention, the one who kept better
> records of the date of conception, got to the patent office first,
> or was more diligent in reducing the invention to practice will be
> awarded the patent, all at the discretion of the patent office.
>

I am advocating a meritocracy or free market as opposed to this handing
out of production rights at the discretion of the authorities.

> Those who appreciate the work and would build on it should, and then
> file their own patent application if they want to practice it
> unencumbered. Otherwise, get it to the marketplace and take your
> chances on getting hit with an infringement suit.
>
> Those who would use the idea to better the economy?  Total and utter
> horseshit.  Just because someone wants to infringe on another's
> patent or copyright  and claims that by doing so the economy will be
> improved is a thief with an excuse.
>
>

The thief is the one holding unfair monopoly rights in my opinion.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>